Skip Navigation
Administration for Children and Families  
ACF
ACF Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News   |   HHS Home

  Questions?  |  Privacy  |  Site Index  |  Contact Us  |  Download Reader™  |  Print      


U.S. Capitol image

Main Menu


Department of Health & Human Services
Administration for Children and Families



EXPIRED

Program Office:

Administration on Developmental Disabilities

Funding Opportunity Title:

University Centers for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities (UCEDDs) Minority Partnership Grants

Announcement Type:

Initial

Funding Opportunity Number:

HHS-2009-ACF-ADD-DD-0096

CFDA Number:

93.632

Due Date For Letter of Intent:

06/04/2009

Due Date for Applications:

07/20/2009

Executive Summary:

The Administration on Developmental Disabilities (ADD) in the Administration for Children and Families (ACF), the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announces the availability of fiscal year 2009 funds to award, on a competitive basis, at least two partnership grants to University Centers for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities Education, Research, and Service (UCEDDs). The partnership grants will be with minority-serving institutions as defined in the Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008 and will utilize a variety of innovative knowledge exchange and transfer strategies that promote and create interdisciplinary approaches to research, training (e.g., pre-service, continuing education, community-based), and services to minority populations with disabilities.




I. FUNDING OPPORTUNITY DESCRIPTION

Statutory Authority

ADD is the lead agency in ACF, HHS for administering the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act of 2000 (DD Act of 2000) (42 U.S.C. 15001, et seq.). The purpose of the DD Act of 2000 is to assure that individuals with developmental disabilities and their families participate in the design of and have access to needed community services, individualized supports, and other forms of assistance that promote self-determination, independence, productivity, integration and inclusion in all facets of community life, through culturally competent programs [Section 101(b)]. To achieve this purpose, the DD Act authorizes under Subtitle D University Centers for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities Education, Research, and Service (UCEDDs).

The Joint Explanatory Statement for the fiscal year 2009 appropriation authorizes ADD to "establish new grants to work through partnerships with minority-serving institutions [to focus on] research, training, and services [related to] minority populations with disabilities." 155 Congressional Record page H2235 (February 23, 2009).   Section 152(d) of the DD Act authorizes ADD to fund the grants as additional grants to existing UCEDDs.

Description

It is well documented that minority populations experience a variety of disparities (e.g., health, wealth, education), many of which places them at an increased risk for developmental and other disabilities or for developing secondary conditions. Moreover, these disparities are, by many measures, expanding.

A variety of federal laws and programs are designed to directly or indirectly address disparities experienced by minority populations (e.g., Civil Rights Act, Head Start Act, Elementary and Secondary Education Act, Higher Education Act). The DD Act of 2000 has long promoted concepts of cultural competence to ensure that individuals with developmental disabilities, regardless of background, are full participants in all aspects of community life.

Nevertheless, problems persist and are being exacerbated by the rapidly changing demographics of our country requiring more targeted efforts that drill down strategies to address disparities that exist for minority populations, most particularly those with disabilities. Partnerships that reach across federal intiatives aimed at reducing disparities is one such targeted effort that could address this persistent problem.

The interdisciplinary approaches currently used by UCEDDs represent a tested set of options that, if more proactively shared through partnership with minority-serving institutions, would play a central role in reducing disparities, such as those related to health and education. There would be multiple beneficiaries of such a partnership. Minority-serving institutions would have the opportunity to access the vast knowledge within the UCEDD Network and apply it in their own settings. UCEDDs would be in a better position to enhance capacity and responsiveness to minority populations with disabilities.  

This opportunity will fund up to two partnership grants that will contribute to addressing disparities experienced by minority populations by working towards equal access to information and use of the myriad of publicly and privately funded and community-based services. The partnership grants will serve as catalysts and models to foster greater involvement with minority-serving institutions and greater attention to minority populations with disabilities by the entire UCEDD Network. The partnerships will alert minority-serving institutions to the value of collaboration with UCEDDs to assist minority populations with disabilities.

ADD anticipates that partnership grants will:

  • Use a variety of strategies to exchange and transfer knowledge between the UCEDDs and the minority-serving institutions, such as faculty and student exchanges, course exchanges, joint course offerings, joint course development, joint research, collaborative community-based training, and/or joint service projects;

  • Expose faculty and students from minority-serving institutions to the benefits of interdisciplinary research, training (e.g., pre-service, continuing education, community-based), and service;

  • Expose faculty and students from UCEDDs to the importance of culture, custom, and tradition in reaching out to and seeking the involvement of minority individuals with disabilities and their families in initiatives that could affect their lives;

  • Expose faculty and students from minority-serving institutions to the range of funding opportunities that UCEDDs pursue and how to do the same, especially through partnerships;

  • Provide UCEDDs with assistance of faculty and students from minority-serving institutions to recruit from minority populations with disabilities to: (1) obtain greater minority participation in on-going UCEDD research, training (e.g., pre-service, continuing education, community-based), and/or service project(s); (2) launch a new one that includes a minority cohort; or (3) launch one focused exclusively on a minority population with disabilities;

  • Create a basis for future collaboration between members of a partnership; and

  • Share experiences from the partnership with other UCEDDs and minority-serving institutions that serve as a catalyst for replication initiatives.

Obligations

Plan for Two-Way Knowledge Exchange and Transfer.  There must be a plan for a two-way knowledge exchange and transfer program between at least one UCEDD and at least one minority-serving institution unique to the UCEDD Network. Minority-serving institutions are those defined in Title III and Title V of the Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008 and identified as:

  • Tribally Controlled Colleges and Universities
  • Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian-Serving Institutions
  • Predominantly Black Institutions
  • Hispanic-Serving Institutions
  • Minority Science and Engineering Improvements Programs

A full listing of minority-serving institutions recognized by the U.S. Department of Education as accredited postsecondary minority institutions can be found at http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/edlite-minorityinst-list-tab.html. Programs unique to the UCEDD Network are institutes of higher education that do not currently receive funding from ADD to support a UCEDD.

The plan should describe the range of strategies that will be used to exchange and transfer knowledge between the UCEDD and the minority-serving institution, such as faculty and student exchanges, course exchanges, joint course offerings, joint course development, joint research, collaborative community-based training, and/or joint service projects.  Each institution (e.g., the UCEDD, minority-serving institution) shall have a plan which outlines roles and responsibilities tied to specific on-going or planned activity/ies.

Outreach and Involvement of Minority Populations with Disabilities.  A grantee must undertake one or more efforts that result in a benefit to members of a minority population with disabilities that, at a minimum (1) enhances their ability to contribute to ongoing or new research, training (e.g., pre-service, continuing education, community-based), or service initiatives of the partnership, (2) provides access to on-going initiatives that have been expanded to include minority populations with disabilities, and (3) empowers them to advocate for themselves in seeking opportunities and services in their communities.

Integration of Knowledge. The grantee must define how knowledge gained from the partnership with the minority-serving institution will be transferred to the UCEDD and vice-versa, how the knowledge gained from the UCEDD will be transferred to the minority-serving institution. This may be accomplished by describing the activities that will lead to knowledge transfer and identifying indicators for determining the transfer of knowledge.

Presentations and Technical Assistance to Non-Partnership Entities to Promote Partnership Replication. At least annually a grantee must share the experience of its partnership with the UCEDD Network and minority-serving institutions, including:

  • What the partnership is doing or has accomplished
  • How it is structured
  • How the resources are allocated
  • The sequence and timing of partnership activities
  • Future plans for collaboration with each other

Methods to share the above information can include national meetings, written products, or national teleconferences using web-based technologies.




II. AWARD INFORMATION

Funding Instrument Type:

Cooperative Agreement

Estimated Total Program Funding:

$450,000

Expected Number of Awards:

2

Ceiling on Amount of Individual Awards:

$225,000 per budget period

Floor on Amount of Individual Awards:

$225,000 per budget period

Average Projected Award Amount:

$225,000 per budget period

Length of Project Periods:

36-month project with three 12-month budget periods

Awards under this announcement are subject to the availability of funds.

Additional Information on Awards

The applicant should provide a budget for the first 12-month budget period only, given that awards under this announcement are subject to the availability of funds.  Non-competing continuation awards will be offered. The award amount for the first 12-month budget period may differ from the award amounts for the continuation award budget periods.

Description of Anticipated Substantial Involvement under the Cooperative Agreement

As a cooperative agreement, substantial involvement is anticipated between the agency and the recipient during performance of the project, which may include the following:

  1. Federal Government approval of new partners proposed to be engaged in the project.

  2. Federal Government and recipient collaboration or joint participation in the performance of the assisted activities.

  3. Federal Government monitoring to permit specified kinds of direction or redirection of the work.

  4. Federal Government requirements prior to award limiting the recipient's discretion with respect to scope of services offered, organizational structure, staffing, mode of operation, and other management processes, coupled with close Federal Government monitoring or operational involvement during performance over and above the normal exercise of Federal stewardship responsibilities to ensure compliance with these requirements.

Please see Section IV.5 for any restrictions on the use of funds for awards made under this announcement.




III. ELIGIBILITY INFORMATION

1. Eligible Applicants

Below is a list of those entities designated as UCEDDs that are eligible to submit an application for this funding opportunity:

  1. Children's Hospital Corporation, Institute for Community Inclusion

  2. Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Human Development Center

  3. University of Vermont, Center on Disability and Community Inclusion

  4. University of Alaska Anchorage, Center for Human Development

  5. University of Connecticut, A.J. Pappanikou Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities

  6. University of Guam, Guam Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities Education, Research

  7. University of Hawaii, Center on Disability Studies

  8. University of Illinois at Chicago, Institute on Disability and Human Development

  9. University of Iowa, Center for Disabilities and Development

  10. University of Kentucky, Interdisciplinary Human Development Institute

  11. University of Maine, Center for Community Inclusion and Disability Studies

  12. University of Minnesota, Institute on Community Integration

  13. University of Nevada-Reno, Nevada UCEDD

  14. University of Oregon, Center on Human Development

  15. University of Puerto Rico, Puerto Rico University Center for Excellence on Developmental Disabilities

  16. University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Boling Center for Developmental Disabilities

  17. Virginia Commonwealth University, Partnership for People with Disabilities

  18. Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University - Rose F. Kennedy University Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities Education, Research, and Service

  19. Children's Hospital of Los Angeles - USC University Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities

  20. University of Missouri - UMKC Institute for Human Development (UCE)

  21. Georgetown University - Georgetown UCEDD

  22. Indiana University, Bloomington - Indiana Institute on Disability and Community

  23. Kennedy Institute, Inc

  24. Minot State University - North Dakota Center for Persons with Disabilities

  25. Northern Arizona University - Institute for Human Development

  26. Ohio State University - Nisonger Center

  27. Oregon Health & Science University - Oregon Institute on Disability & Development

  28. Rhode Island College - Paul V. Sherlock Center on Disabilities

  29. Temple University, School Of Medicine - Institute on Disabilities

  30. The University of Texas At Austin - Texas Center for Disability Studies

  31. UMDNJ, Robert Wood Johnson Med School - The Elizabeth M. Boggs Center on Developmental Disabilities

  32. University  of South  Carolina - Center for Disability Resources

  33. University of Alabama , Birmingham - Civitan International Research Center

  34. University of Arkansas For Medical Sciences - Partners for Inclusive Communities

  35. University of California-Los Angeles - Tarjan Center

  36. University of Cincinnati - University of Cincinnati UCE

  37. University of Colorado - JFK Partners

  38. University of Delaware - Center for Disabilities Studies

  39. University of Georgia - Institute on Human Development and Disability

  40. University of Hawaii - Center on Disability Studies

  41. University of Idaho - Center on Disabilities and Human Development

  42. University of Kansas - Kansas University Center on Developmental Disabilities

  43. University of Massachusetts Medical School at Worcester - Eunice Kennedy Shriver Center

  44. University of Miami - Mailman Center for Child Development

  45. University of Montana - The University of Montana Rural Institute

  46. University of Nebraska - Munroe-Meyer Institute for Genetics and Rehabilitation

  47. University of New Hampshire - Institute on Disability

  48. University of New Mexico - Center for Development and Disability

  49. University of North Carolina At Chapel Hill - Center for Development and Learning

  50. University of Oklahoma - Center for Learning and Leadership

  51. University of South Dakota - Center for Disabilities

  52. University of Southern Mississippi - Institute for Disability Studies: Mississippi's UCE

  53. University of The Virgin Islands - Virgin Islands University Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities

  54. University of Washington - Center on Human Development and Disabilities

  55. University of Wyoming - Wyoming INstitute for Disabilities

  56. Utah State University - Center for Persons with Disabilities

  57. Wayne State University - Developmental Disabilities Institute

  58. West Virginia University - Center for Excellence in Disabilities

  59. Westchester Institute for Human Development

  60. UC Davis M.I.N.D. Institute - Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities at the

  61. Texas A&M University - Center on Disability and Development

  62. University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute -  Florida Center for Inclusive Communities

  63. Vanderbilt University - Vanderbilt Kennedy Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities

  64. National Center for Learning and Development (eligible to apply up to July 1, 2009. After July 1, 2009, the newly designated UCEDD will be the eligible applicant)

  65. University of Arizona - Sonoran UCEDD

  66. University of Rochester - Strong Center for Development Disabilities

  67. University of Wisconsin-Madison, Waisman Center on Mental Retardation and Human Development

Applications will be received and reviewed for only those entities listed above. Applications from other entities not designated as a UCEDD will not be received and reviewed.

Foreign entities are not eligible under this announcement.

Please see "Eligibility Certification" found in Section IV.2 for any required documentation supporting eligibility.

2. Cost Sharing or Matching: Yes

Grantees are required to meet a non-Federal share of the project costs, in accordance with Section 154(d) of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act of 2000.

Grantees must provide at least 25 percent of the total approved cost of the project. The total approved cost of the project is the sum of the ACF (Federal) share and the non-Federal share. The non-Federal share may be met by cash or in-kind contributions, although applicants are encouraged to meet their match requirements through cash contributions. For example, in order to meet the match requirements, a project requesting $300,000, in ACF (Federal) funds must provide a non-Federal share of the approved total project cost of at least $75,000 , which is 25 percent of total approved project cost of $300,000. Grantees will be held accountable for commitments of non-Federal resources even if they exceed the amount of the required match. Failure to provide the required amount will result in the disallowance of Federal funds. A lack of supporting documentation at the time of application will not exclude the application from competitive review.

Reduced Match

Section 154 (d)(2) of the DD Act states:

In the case of a project whose activities or products target individuals with developmental disabilities who live in an urban or rural poverty area, as determined by the Secretary, the Federal share of the cost of the project may not be more than 90 percent of the necessary costs of the project.

DEFINITIONS

Poverty area: census tracts or block numbering areas (BNAs) where at least 20 percent of residents are below the poverty level.

Urban Area: Collective term referring to all areas that are urban. For Census 2000, there are two types of urban areas: urban clusters and urbanized areas.

  • Urban Cluster (UC): A densely settled territory that has at least 2,500 people but fewer than 50,000. 

  • Urbanized Area (UA): An area consisting of a central place(s) and adjacent territory with a general population density of at least 1,000 people per square mile of land area that together have a minimum residential population of at least 50,000 people. The U.S. Census Bureau uses published criteria to determine the qualification and boundaries of UAs.

  • Rural: Territory, population and housing units not classified as urban. Rural classification cuts across other hierarchies and can be in metropolitan or non-metropolitan areas. Rural can include frontier, which are places having a population density of six or fewer people per square mile.

TWO-TIER ELIGIBILITY SYSTEM FOR REDUCED MATCH

To meet the requirements in the DD Act, ADD has developed a system that UCEDDs can use to request a reduced match on the core grant. Such a request is optional and not a requirement for UCEDDs.

ADD will use a two-tiered system for determining eligibility for the reduced match:

  • Tier 1: UCEDDs in States where the poverty rate is equal to or greater than the official national poverty rate would automatically qualify for the reduced match. For 2006, the rate was 12.5 percent.

  • Tier 2: UCEDDs in States with a poverty rate not equal to or greater than the official national poverty rate would have to show that the UCEDD activities target individuals with developmental disabilities in urban or rural poverty areas. In doing so, the UCEDD would demonstrate that at least 25 percent of the UCEDD projects target individuals with developmental disabilities who live in urban and rural poverty areas by providing the following information to ADD:
    • The current State poverty rate

    • A full listing of all the UCEDD's current projects [this can be generated from the National Information Reporting System (NIRS)]

    • Identify which UCEDD activities are targeting individuals with developmental disabilities living in urban and rural poverty areas by stating whether the UCEDD activity is associated with any of the Urban and Rural Poverty Indicators listed in the announcement or is targeted for individuals with developmental disabilities in an urban and rural poverty area through some other means. A UCEDD seeking to establish eligibility for a reduced match through means other than showing an activity is associated with one or more of the Urban and Rural Poverty Indicators must include in its application other information that establishes that its activities are targeted to benefit individuals with developmental disabilities in an urban or rural poverty area. Because there are not Federal poverty rates for Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin Islands, these jurisdictions can qualify for the reduced match by establishing that the UCEDD activity is associated with any of the Urban and Rural Poverty Indicators listed in the announcement or is targeted for individuals with developmental disabilities in an urban or rural poverty area through some other means.

    • Below is information on the Urban or Rural Poverty Indicators that will be used to determine eligibility for the reduced match.

Urban and Rural Poverty Indicator and Description

Empowerment Zones and Enterprise Communities (EZ/EC): Areas designated by the U.S. Department of Agriculture as communities with high rates of poverty. The UCEDD project would have to be implemented in an EZ/EC.

Food Stamps: The Food Stamp Program helps low-income people and families buy the food they need for good health. The UCEDD project would have to target individuals with DD and their families who receive food stamps.

The National School Lunch Program (NSLP): also referred to as Free and Reduced Lunch Program is a federally assisted meal program operating to provide low-cost or free lunches to children. The UCEDD project would have to be implemented in a school that qualifies for the NSLP.

Head Start: The Head Start program provides grants to local public and private non-profit and for-profit agencies to provide comprehensive child development services to economically disadvantaged children and families. The UCEDD project would have to work with a Head Start program.

Housing Assistance: The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development has a variety of housing assistance programs, such as Section 8 housing assistance programs. The UCEDD project would have to target individuals with DD and their families who are receiving federal housing assistance.

Medicaid: Title XIX of the Social Security Act is a Federal/State entitlement program that pays for medical assistance for certain individuals and families with low incomes and resources. The UCEDD project would have to target individuals with DD and their families who are Medicaid-eligible.

Supplemental Security Income (SSI): SSI is designed to help aged, blind and disabled people, who have little or no income. It provides cash to meet basic needs for food, clothing and shelter. The UCEDD project would have to target individuals with DD who are SSI recipients.

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF): TANF is a Federal poverty program that provides assistance and work opportunities to needy families through grants to States. The UCEDD project would have to target individuals with DD, children with DD, and their families who are TANF recipients.

Other: The UCEDD may provide other indicators of poverty not included in this list. The UCEDD would have to provide adequate information to justify use of the 'other' category. In doing so, the UCEDD will have to demonstrate the project is targeting individuals with developmental disabilities in rural and urban poverty areas. ADD will determine the adequacy of the justification for eligibility for a reduced match.

ADD will review all the information submitted by the UCEDD to determine eligibility for the reduced match.

SUGGESTED FORMAT FOR SUBMITTING INFORMATION TO ADD

To streamline the process, below is a suggested format for submitting the information to ADD.

  1. List the Official National Poverty Rate of 12.5

  2. Provide the State Poverty Rate

  3. List out the UCEDD Project Title (e.g., Provide Name of Project and project description) and Description and the Indicators of Poverty (List name of poverty program targeted by project)

  4. Of the total UCEDD projects, provide the percent that is targeting individuals with developmental disabilities living in urban and rural poverty areas 

STATES IN TIERS 1 AND 2

Below is a list of the States that fall into Tiers 1 and 2.

Tier 1

Alabama: 16.0

Arizona: 14.7

Arkansas: 15.6

California: 12.9

Dist. of Columbia: 18.8

Georgia: 13.3

Kentucky: 16.5

Louisiana: 17.4

Michigan: 12.9
Mississippi: 19.8

Montana: 13.8

New Mexico: 17.1

New York: 14.5

North Carolina: 13.8

Oklahoma: 13.9

South Carolina: 13.7

Tennessee: 15.2

Texas: 16.4

West Virginia: 15.0

 

U.S.: 12.5

 

Tier 2

Alaska: 9.3

Colorado: 10.4

Connecticut: 9.1

Delaware: 9.2

Florida: 11.4

Hawaii: 8.8

Idaho: 9.8

Illinois: 11.5

Indiana: 11.6

Iowa: 10.8

Kansas: 12.2

Maine: 11.5

Maryland: 9.3

Massachusetts: 10.5

Minnesota: 7.7

Missouri: 11.7

Nebraska: 9.7

Nevada: 10.4

New Hampshire: 5.5

New Jersey: 7.9

North Dakota: 10.8

Ohio: 12.0

Oregon: 11.9

Pennsylvania: 11.3

Rhode Island: 11.3

South Dakota: 12.0

Utah: 9.5

Vermont: 7.7

Virginia: 9.1

Washington: 9.9

Wisconsin: 10.9

Wyoming: 10.2

The total approved cost of the project is the sum of the ACF share and the reduced non-Federal share. The reduced non-Federal share may be met by cash or in-kind contributions, although applicants are encouraged to meet their match requirements through cash contributions. For example, in order to meet the match requirements, a project with a total approved project cost of $250,000 requesting $225,000 in ACF funds, must provide a non-Federal share of at least $25,000 (10 percent of total approved project cost of $250,000). Grantees will be held countable for commitments of non-Federal resources even if they exceed the amount of the required match. Failure to provide the required amount will result in the disallowance of Federal funds. A lack of supporting documentation at the time of application will not exclude the application from competitive review.

The non-Federal match will be evaluated according to the "Non-Federal Resources" evaluation criterion found in Section V of this announcement.

Please refer to Section IV for any pre-award requirements.

3. Other:

Disqualification Factors

Applications with requests that exceed the ceiling on the amount of individual awards referenced in Section II. Award Information will be deemed non-responsive and will not be considered for funding under this announcement.

Any application that fails to satisfy the deadline requirements referenced in Section IV.3., Submission Dates and Times, will be deemed non-responsive and will not be considered for funding under this announcement.

Applicants received from entites not designated as a UCEDD will not be considered for funding under this announcement and will not be returned.

 




IV. APPLICATION AND SUBMISSION INFORMATION

1. Address to Request Application Package:

Jennifer G. Johnson, Ed.D.
Administration on Developmental Disabilities
Administration for Children and Families
Mail Stop: HHH 405-D
370 L'Enfant Promenade, SW.
Washington, DC 20447
Phone:  202-690-5982
Fax: 202-205-8037
Email: jennifer.johnson@acf.hhs.gov
URL: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/add/index.html

For hearing or speech impaired callers, contact the Federal Relay Service at 1-800-877-8339 (TTY (Text Telephone) / ASCII (American Standard Code For Information Interchange)).

2. Content and Form of Application Submission:

This section provides information on the required form and content of application submissions. Applicants are required to submit one original and two copies of all application materials if applying in hard-copy. The original signature of the Authorized Organization Representative (AOR) is required only on the original. Information on the required format, Standard Forms (SFs) and other forms, D-U-N-S Requirement, Project Description, Certifications, Assurances, Electronic Submission of applications, and Hard Copy submission of applications is available in this section. A Checklist of required application elements is available for applicants' use in Section VIII of this announcement.

The project description must not exceed 50 double-spaced, typed pages. The type must not be smaller than 12 point. The margins must not be less than one inch. The program description pages should be numbered. Any application that exceeds the 50-page limit requirement will have the additional pages removed from the application prior to the review.

The Appendix must not exceed 40 pages. The Appendix pages should be numbered. Supplementary material, intended to provide examples of activities, may be included in the Appendix for reviewers but shall adhere to the page limit requirement. The Appendix must be included with the original and the three copies of the application.

Non-Federal Reviewers

Since ACF will be using non-Federal reviewers in the review process, applicants have the option of omitting from the application copies (not the original) specific salary rates or amounts for individuals specified in the application budget as well as Social Security Numbers, if otherwise required for individuals.  The copies may include summary salary information.

If applicants are submitting their application electronically, ACF will omit the same specific salary rate information from copies made for use during the review and selection process.

Forms

Applicants seeking financial assistance under this announcement must file the appropriate Standard Forms (SFs) as described in this section.  All applicants must submit an SF-424, Application for Federal Assistance.  For non-construction programs, applicants must also submit an SF-424A, Budget Information and an SF-424B, Assurances.   For construction programs, applicants must also submit SF-424C, Budget Information and SF-424D, Assurances.  All required Standard Forms are available at: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_resources.html.

Non-profit private organizations (not including private universities) are encouraged to submit the "Survey on Ensuring Equal Opportunity for Applicants" with their applications.  Applicants using a hard copy application, place the completed survey in an envelope labeled "Applicant Survey." Seal the envelope and include it along with your application package.  Applicants applying electronically, please submit this survey along with your application.   The Survey may be found at http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_resources.html.

D-U-N-S Requirement

All applicants must have a D&B Data Universal Numbering System (D-U-N-S) number.   A D-U-N-S number is required whether an applicant is submitting a paper application or using the government-wide electronic portal, Grants.gov.   A D-U-N-S number is required for every application for a new award or renewal/continuation of an award, including applications or plans under formula, entitlement, and block grant programs.  A D-U-N-S number may be acquired at no cost by calling the dedicated toll-free D-U-N-S number request line at 1-866-705-5711 or you may request a number online at http://www.dnb.com.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Part I   THE PROJECT DESCRIPTION OVERVIEW

PURPOSE

The project description provides the majority of information by which an application is evaluated and ranked in competition with other applications for available assistance.  The project description should be concise and complete.  It should address the activity for which Federal funds are being requested.  Supporting documents should be included where they can present information clearly and succinctly.  In preparing the project description, information that is responsive to each of the requested evaluation criteria must be provided.   Awarding offices use this and other information in making their funding recommendations.   It is important, therefore, that this information be included in the application in a manner that is clear and complete.

GENERAL EXPECTATIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS

ACF is particularly interested in specific project descriptions that focus on outcomes and convey strategies for achieving intended performance. Project descriptions are evaluated on the basis of substance and measurable outcomes, not length. Extensive exhibits are not required. Cross-referencing should be used rather than repetition. Supporting information concerning activities that will not be directly funded by the grant or information that does not directly pertain to an integral part of the grant-funded activity should be placed in an appendix.

Part II   GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARING A FULL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

INTRODUCTION

Applicants that are required to submit a full project description shall prepare the project description statement in accordance with the following instructions while being aware of the specified evaluation criteria. The text options give a broad overview of what the project description should include while the evaluation criteria identify the measures that will be used to evaluate applications.

LETTER OF INTENT

Applicants are strongly encouraged to notify ACF of their intention to submit an application under this announcement. Please submit the letter of intent by the deadline date listed in Section IV.3 Submission Dates and Times.

The letter of intent should include the following information: number and title of this announcement; the name and address of the applicant organization; and/or Fiscal Agent (if known); and the name, phone number, fax number and email address of a contact person.

Letter of intent information will be used to determine the number of expert reviewers needed to evaluate applications. The letter of intent is optional. Failure to submit a letter of intent will not impact eligibility to submit an application and will not disqualify an application from competitive review.

Letters of intent may be emailed to Jennifer Johnson at jennifer.johnson@acf.hhs.gov.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

List the contents of the application including corresponding page numbers.

PROJECT SUMMARY/ABSTRACT

Provide a summary of the project description (one page or less) with reference to the funding request.

OBJECTIVES AND NEED FOR ASSISTANCE

Clearly identify the physical, economic, social, financial, institutional, and/or other problem(s) requiring a solution. The need for assistance must be demonstrated and the principal and subordinate objectives of the project must be clearly stated; supporting documentation, such as letters of support and testimonials from concerned interests other than the applicant, may be included. Any relevant data based on planning studies should be included or referred to in the endnotes/footnotes. Incorporate demographic data and participant/beneficiary information, as needed. In developing the project description, the applicant may volunteer or be requested to provide information on the total range of projects currently being conducted and supported (or to be initiated), some of which may be outside the scope of the program announcement.

RESULTS OR BENEFITS EXPECTED

Identify the results and benefits to be derived.

For example, Faculty and students from minority-serving institutions are exposed to the benefits of interdisciplinary research, training (e.g., pre-service, continuing education, community-based), and service. Faculty and students from UCEDDs are exposed to the importance of culture, custom, and tradition in reaching out to and seeking the involvement of minority individuals with disabilities and their families in initiatives that could affect their lives. Faculty and students from minority-serving institutions are exposed to the range of funding opportunities that UCEDDs pursue and how to do the same, especially through partnerships. UCEDDs are provided with assistance of faculty and students from minority-serving institutions to recruit from minority populations with disabilities to: (1) obtain greater minority participation to on-going UCEDD research, training (e.g., pre-service, continuing education, community-based), and/or service project(s); (2) launch a new one that includes a minority cohort; or (3) launch one focused exclusively on a minority population with disabilities. The project identifies critical elements for future collaboration between members of a partnership. The experiences from the partnership are shared with other UCEDDs and minority-serving institutions and serve as a catalyst for replication initiatives.

APPROACH

Outline a plan of action that describes the scope and detail of how the proposed work will be accomplished. Account for all functions or activities identified in the application. Cite factors that might accelerate or decelerate the work and state your reason for taking the proposed approach rather than others. Describe any unusual features of the project such as design or technological innovations, reductions in cost or time, or extraordinary social and community involvement.

The approach must describe a plan for two-way knowledge exchange and transfer program between at least one UCEDD and at least one minority-serving institution unique to the UCEDD Network. Minority-serving institutions are those defined in Title III and Title V of the Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008 and identified as:

  • Tribally Controlled Colleges and Universities
  • Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian-Serving Institutions
  • Predominantly Black Institutions
  • Hispanic-Serving Institutions
  • Minority Science and Engineering Improvements Programs

A full listing of minority institutions recognized by the U.S. Department of Education as accredited postsecondary minority institutions can be found at http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/edlite-minorityinst-list-tab.html. Programs unique to the UCEDD Network are institutes of higher education that do not currently receive funding from ADD to support a UCEDD.

The plan should describe the range of strategies that will be used to exchange and transfer knowledge between the UCEDD and the minority-serving institution, such as faculty and student exchanges, course exchanges, joint course offerings, joint course development, joint research, collaborative community-based training, and/or joint service projects. Each institution (e.g., the UCEDD, minority-serving institution) shall have a plan which outlines roles and responsibilities tied to specific on-going or planned activity.

The approach must describe outreach and involvement of minority populations with disabilities. A grantee must undertake one or more efforts that result in a benefit to members of a minority population with disabilities that, at a minimum (1) enhances their ability to contribute to ongoing or new research, training (e.g., pre-service, continuing education, community-based), or service initiatives of the partnership, (2) provides access to on-going initiatives that have been expanded to include minority populations with disabilities, and (3) empowers them to advocate for themselves in seeking opportunities and services in their communities.

The approach must define how knowledge gained from the partnership with the minority-serving institution will be transferred to the UCEDD. This may be accomplished by describing the activities that will lead to knowledge transfer and identifying indicators for determining the transfer of knowledge.

The approach must include a plan to at least annually share the experience of its partnership with the UCEDD Network and minority-serving institutions, including:

  • What the partnership is doing or has accomplished
  • How it is structured
  • How the resources are allocated
  • The sequence and timing of partnership activities
  • Future plans for collaboration with each other

Methods to share the above information can include national meetings, written products, or national teleconferences using web-based technologies.

Provide quantitative monthly or quarterly projections of the accomplishments to be achieved for each function or activity in such terms as the number of people to be served and the number of activities accomplished.

When accomplishments cannot be quantified by activity or function, list them in chronological order to show the schedule of accomplishments and their target dates.

If any data is to be collected, maintained, and/or disseminated, clearance may be required from OMB.  This clearance pertains to any "collection of information that is conducted or sponsored by ACF."

Provide a list of organizations, cooperating entities, consultants, or other key individuals who will work on the project along with a short description of the nature of their effort or contribution.

EVALUATION

Provide a narrative addressing how the conduct of the project and the results of the project will be evaluated.  In addressing the evaluation of results, state how you will determine the extent to which the project has achieved its stated objectives and the extent to which the accomplishment of objectives can be attributed to the project.  Discuss the criteria to be used to evaluate results, and explain the methodology that will be used to determine if the needs identified and discussed are being met and if the project results and benefits are being achieved.  With respect to the conduct of the project, define the procedures to be employed to determine whether the project is being conducted in a manner consistent with the work plan presented and discuss the impact of the project's various activities that address the project's effectiveness.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

The following are requests for additional information that must be included in the application:

LOGIC MODEL

Applicants are expected to use a model for designing and managing their project. A logic model is a tool that presents the conceptual framework for a proposed project and explains the linkages among program elements. While there are many versions of the logic model, they generally summarize the logical connections among the needs that are the focus of the project, project goals and objectives, the target population, project inputs (resources), the proposed activities/processes/outputs directed toward the target population, the expected short- and long-term outcomes the initiative is designed to achieve, and the evaluation plan for measuring the extent to which proposed processes and outcomes actually occur.

STAFF AND POSITION DATA

Provide a biographical sketch and job description for each key person appointed. Job descriptions for each vacant key position should be included as well. As new key staff is appointed, biographical sketches will also be required.

ORGANIZATIONAL PROFILES

Provide information on the applicant organization(s) and cooperating partners, such as: organizational charts; financial statements; audit reports or statements from Certified Public Accountants/Licensed Public Accountants; Employer Identification Number(s); contact persons and telephone numbers; names of bond carriers; child care licenses and other documentation of professional accreditation; information on compliance with Federal/State/local government standards; documentation of experience in the program area; and, other pertinent information.

DISSEMINATION PLAN

Provide a plan for distributing reports and other project outputs to colleagues and to the public.   Applicants must provide a description of the method, volume, and timing of distribution.

THIRD-PARTY AGREEMENTS

Provide written and signed agreements between grantees and subgrantees, or subcontractors, or other cooperating entities.   These agreements must detail the scope of work to be performed, work schedules, remuneration, and other terms and conditions that structure or define the relationship.

LETTERS OF SUPPORT

Provide statements from community, public, and commercial leaders that support the project proposed for funding.   All submissions should be included in the application package or by the application deadline.

BUDGET AND BUDGET JUSTIFICATION

Provide a budget with line-item detail and detailed calculations for each budget object class identified on the Budget Information Form (SF-424A or SF-424C).  Detailed calculations must include estimation methods, quantities, unit costs, and other similar quantitative detail sufficient for the calculation to be duplicated.  If matching is a requirement, include a breakout by the funding sources identified in Block 15 of the SF-424.

Provide a narrative budget justification that describes how the categorical costs are derived.  Discuss the necessity, reasonableness, and allocation of the proposed costs.

GENERAL

Use the following guidelines for preparing the budget and budget justification.  Both Federal and non-Federal resources (when required) shall be detailed and justified in the budget and budget narrative justification.   "Federal resources" refers only to the ACF grant funds for which you are applying.  "Non-Federal resources" are all other non-ACF Federal and non-Federal resources.  It is suggested that budget amounts and computations be presented in a columnar format:  first column, object class categories; second column, Federal budget; next column(s), non-Federal budget(s); and last column, total budget.  The budget justification should be in a narrative form.

PERSONNEL

Description:  Costs of employee salaries and wages.

Justification:  Identify the project director or principal investigator, if known at the time of application.   For each staff person, provide:  the title; time commitment to the project in months; time commitment to the project as a percentage or full-time equivalent; annual salary; grant salary; wage rates; etc.  Do not include the costs of consultants, personnel costs of delegate agencies, or of specific project(s) and/or businesses to be financed by the applicant.

FRINGE BENEFITS

Description: Costs of employee fringe benefits unless treated as part of an approved indirect cost rate.

Justification: Provide a breakdown of the amounts and percentages that comprise fringe benefit costs such as health insurance, FICA, retirement insurance, taxes, etc.

TRAVEL

Description: Costs of project-related travel by employees of the applicant organization.  (This item does not include costs of consultant travel).

Justification:  For each trip show:  the total number of traveler(s); travel destination; duration of trip; per diem; mileage allowances, if privately owned vehicles will be used; and other transportation costs and subsistence allowances.  If appropriate for this project, travel costs for key staff to attend ACF-sponsored workshops should be detailed in the budget.

EQUIPMENT

Description:  "Equipment" means an article of nonexpendable, tangible personal property having a useful life of more than one year and an acquisition cost that equals or exceeds the lesser of:  (a) the capitalization level established by the organization for the financial statement purposes, or (b) $5,000.  (Note:   Acquisition cost means the net invoice unit price of an item of equipment, including the cost of any modifications, attachments, accessories, or auxiliary apparatus necessary to make it usable for the purpose for which it is acquired.   Ancillary charges, such as taxes, duty, protective in-transit insurance, freight, and installation, shall be included in or excluded from acquisition cost in accordance with the organization's regular written accounting practices.)

Justification:  For each type of equipment requested provide:  a description of the equipment; the cost per unit; the number of units; the total cost; and a plan for use on the project; as well as use and/or disposal of the equipment after the project ends.  An applicant organization that uses its own definition for equipment should provide a copy of its policy, or section of its policy, that includes the equipment definition.

SUPPLIES

Description:  Costs of all tangible personal property other than that included under the Equipment category.

Justification:  Specify general categories of supplies and their costs.  Show computations and provide other information that supports the amount requested.

CONTRACTUAL

Description:  Costs of all contracts for services and goods except for those that belong under other categories such as equipment, supplies, construction, etc.  Include third-party evaluation contracts, if applicable, and contracts with secondary recipient organizations, including delegate agencies and specific project(s) and/or businesses to be financed by the applicant.

Justification:  Demonstrate that all procurement transactions will be conducted in a manner to provide, to the maximum extent practical, open and free competition. Recipients and subrecipients, other than States that are required to use 45 CFR Part 92 procedures, must justify any anticipated procurement action that is expected to be awarded without competition and exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold fixed at 41 USC 403(11), currently set at $100,000.

Recipients might be required to make available to ACF pre-award review and procurement documents, such as requests for proposals or invitations for bids, independent cost estimates, etc.

Note:  Whenever the applicant intends to delegate part of the project to another agency, the applicant must provide a detailed budget and budget narrative for each delegate agency, by agency title, along with the required supporting information referred to in these instructions.

OTHER

Enter the total of all other costs.  Such costs, where applicable and appropriate, may include but are not limited to:  insurance; food; medical and dental costs (noncontractual); professional services costs; space and equipment rentals; printing and publication; computer use; training costs, such as tuition and stipends; staff development costs; and administrative costs.

Justification:  Provide computations, a narrative description and a justification for each cost under this category.

INDIRECT CHARGES

Description:  Total amount of indirect costs.  This category should be used only when the applicant currently has an indirect cost rate approved by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) or another cognizant Federal agency.

Justification:  An applicant that will charge indirect costs to the grant must enclose a copy of the current rate agreement.  If the applicant organization is in the process of initially developing or renegotiating a rate, upon notification that an award will be made, it should immediately develop a tentative indirect cost rate proposal based on its most recently completed fiscal year, in accordance with the cognizant agency's guidelines for establishing indirect cost rates, and submit it to the cognizant agency.  Applicants awaiting approval of their indirect cost proposals may also request indirect costs.  When an indirect cost rate is requested, those costs included in the indirect cost pool should not be charged as direct costs to the grant.  Also, if the applicant is requesting a rate that is less than what is allowed under the program, the authorized representative of the applicant organization must submit a signed acknowledgement that the applicant is accepting a lower rate than allowed.

PROGRAM INCOME

Description:  The estimated amount of income, if any, expected to be generated from this project.

Justification:  Describe the nature, source and anticipated use of program income in the budget or refer to the pages in the application that contain this information.

NON-FEDERAL RESOURCES

Description:  Amounts of non-Federal resources that will be used to support the project as identified in Block 18 of the SF-424.

Justification:  The firm commitment of these resources must be documented and submitted with the application so that the applicant is given credit in the review process.  A detailed budget must be prepared for each funding source.

(As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, P.L. 104-13, the public reporting burden for the Project Description is estimated to average 40 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and reviewing the collection information. The Project Description information collection is approved under OMB control number 0970-0139, which expires 4/30/2010. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.)

Certifications

Applicants must furnish, prior to award, an executed copy of the Certification Regarding Lobbying.   Applicants must sign and return the certification with their application.   If any funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan, the applicant shall complete and submit Standard Form (SF)-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions.   The Certification Regarding Lobbying may be found at: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_resources.html.

When required for programs that involve human subjects, the Protection of Human Subjects Assurance Identification/IRB Certification/Declaration of Exemption form must be submitted.  All forms may be reproduced for use in submitting applications.  Applicants must sign and return the appropriate standard forms with their application.  The Protection of Human Subjects Assurance Identification/IRB Certification/Declaration of Exemption (Common Rule) form may be found at: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_resources.html.

Assurances

By signing and submitting the application, applicants are making the appropriate certification of their compliance with all Federal statutes relating to nondiscrimination.

The Pro-Children Act of 1994, 20 U.S.C. 7183, imposes restrictions on smoking in facilities where federally funded children's services are provided.  HHS grants are subject to these requirements only if they meet the Act's specified coverage.  The Act specifies that smoking is prohibited in any indoor facility (owned, leased, or contracted for) used for the routine or regular provision of kindergarten, elementary, or secondary education or library services to children under the age of 18.  In addition, smoking is prohibited in any indoor facility or portion of a facility (owned, leased, or contracted for) used for the routine or regular provision of federally funded health care, day care, or early childhood development, including Head Start services to children under the age of 18.  The statutory prohibition also applies if such facilities are constructed, operated, or maintained with Federal funds.  The statute does not apply to children's services provided in private residences, facilities funded solely by Medicare or Medicaid funds, portions of facilities used for inpatient drug or alcohol treatment, or facilities where WIC coupons are redeemed.  Failure to comply with the provisions of the law may result in the imposition of a civil monetary penalty of up to $1,000 per violation and/or the imposition of an administrative compliance order on the responsible entity.  Additional information may be found in the HHS Grants Policy Statement at: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_related.html.

Electronic Submission

Applicants to ACF may submit their applications in either electronic or paper (hard copy) format.   To submit an application electronically, applicants must use the http://www.Grants.gov site.  ACF will not accept applications via facsimile or email.

IMPORTANT NOTE:  Before submitting an application electronically, applicants must complete the organization registration process as well as obtain and register "electronic signature credentials" for the Authorized Organization Representative (AOR).  Applicants also must be registered in the Central Contractor Registry (CCR).  CCR registration must be updated annually.  Applicants will not be able to upload an application to Grants.gov without current CCR registration and electronic signature credentials for the AOR.  This process may take more than five business days, so it is important to start this process early, well in advance of the application deadline.

Be sure to complete all Grants.gov registration processes listed on the Organization Registration Checklist at http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/registration_checklist.html.

Applicants will be able to download a copy of the application package, complete it off-line, and then upload and submit the application via the Grants.gov site.

If planning to submit an application electronically via http://www.Grants.gov:

  • It is strongly recommended that applicants do not wait until the application due date to begin the application process through Grants.gov.  Applicants are encouraged to submit their applications well before the closing date and time so that, if difficulties are encountered, there will still be sufficient time to submit a hard copy via express mail.


  • In order to address any difficulties that may be encountered during the submission process, it may be to an applicant's advantage to submit their applications 24 hours ahead of the closing date and time.


  • Applicants are encouraged to check the Grants.gov webpage for announcements concerning system issues and updates that may affect the submission of applications.


  • Checklists and registration brochures are maintained at the Grants.gov website to assist applicants in the registration process and may be found at: http://www.grants.gov/applicants/get_registered.jsp


  • If any difficulties are encountered in using Grants.gov, contact the Grants.gov Contact Center at: 1-800-518-4726, or by email at support@grants.gov, to report the problem and obtain assistance.  Remember to retain your service ticket number for reference whenever you have any interaction with the Grants.gov Contact Center.


  • Electronic submission is voluntary, but strongly encouraged.  Applicants will not receive additional point value for submitting an application in electronic format, nor will ACF penalize any applicant that submits an application in hard copy.


  • Applicants may access the electronic application and downloadable application package for this program announcement by using the FIND function at http://www.Grants.gov.


  • Applicants may submit all required documents electronically, including all information typically included on the SF-424s, narratives, charts, etc.


  • Electronic formats for the application attachments, such as narratives, charts, etc., should use standard software formats, e.g., Microsoft (Word and Excel), Word Perfect, Adobe PDF, JPEG, and GIF, etc..


  • Though applying electronically, the application must still comply with any page limitation requirements described in this program announcement.


  • When submitting an application via Grants.gov, applicants must comply with all due dates AND times referenced in Section IV.3.  Submission Dates and Times of this program announcement.


  • Applicants that must demonstrate proof of non-profit status may submit proof at the time of application by attaching the documentation to the electronic application, if they wish to do so.   Proof of non-profit status, and any other required documentation, may be scanned and attached as an "Other Attachment."  Assurances, certifications, and/or proof of non-profit status that are not submitted electronically at the time of application, are required to be submitted to ACF by the time of award and in hard copy.  Acceptable types of proof of non-profit status are stated earlier in this section of the program announcement under "Eligibility Certification."


  • It is strongly recommended that the applicant retain a printed hard copy of the application in case a hard copy must be submitted to ACF.

After the application is submitted electronically, the applicant will receive two emails from Grants.gov:

  • An automatic acknowledgement of the application's submission that will provide a Grants.gov tracking number.

  • An acknowledgement that the submitted application package has passed or failed a series of checks and validations.

ACF will retrieve the electronically submitted application from Grants.gov.  Applicants will receive an email notification from ACF acknowledging that ACF has received the application.

ACF may request that the applicant provide original signatures on forms at a later date.

The Grants.gov website complies with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.   Grants.gov webpages are designed to work with assistive technologies such as screen readers.   If an applicant uses assistive technology and is unable to access any material on the site, contact the Grants.gov Contact Center at support@grants.gov for assistance.

Hard Copy Submission of Applications

Applicants that are submitting their application in paper format should submit one original and two copies of the complete application with all attachments, unless directed otherwise.  The original and each of the two copies must include all required forms, certifications, assurances, and appendices, be signed by the Authorized Organization Representative (AOR), and be unbound.   The original copy of the application must have original signature(s).  See Section IV.6 of this announcement for address information for application submissions.

Please refer to Section VIII for a checklist of application requirements, their location and due dates that applicants may use in developing and organizing application materials.

Please refer to Section IV.3 for details concerning acknowledgement of received applications.

3. Submission Dates and Times:

Due Date For Letter of Intent: 06/04/2009

Due Date for Applications: 07/20/2009

Explanation of Due Dates

The due date for receipt of applications is referenced above.  Applications received after 4:30 p.m., eastern time, on the due date will be classified as late and will not be considered in the current competition.

Applicants are responsible for ensuring that applications are mailed or hand-delivered or submitted electronically well in advance of the application due date and time.

Mail

Applications that are submitted by mail must be received no later than 4:30 p.m., eastern time, on the due date referenced above at the address listed in Section IV.6.

Hand Delivery

Applications hand carried by applicants, applicant couriers, other representatives of the applicant, or by overnight/express mail couriers must be received on or before the due date referenced above, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., eastern time, at the address referenced in Section IV.6., between Monday and Friday (excluding Federal holidays).

Electronic Submission

Applications submitted electronically via Grants.gov must be submitted no later than 4:30 p.m., eastern time, on the due date referenced above.

ACF cannot accommodate transmission of applications by facsimile or email.

Late Applications

Applications that do not meet the requirements above are considered late applications.  ACF shall notify each late applicant that its application will not be considered in the current competition.

ANY APPLICATION RECEIVED AFTER 4:30 P.M., EASTERN TIME, ON THE DUE DATE WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED FOR COMPETITION.

Extension of Deadlines

ACF may extend application deadlines when circumstances such as acts of God (floods, hurricanes, etc.) occur; when there are widespread disruptions of mail service; or in other rare cases.  A determination to extend or waive deadline requirements rests with the Chief Grants Management Officer.

Acknowledgement of Received Application

ACF will not provide acknowledgement of receipt of hard copy application packages submitted via mail, courier services, or by hand delivery.  Applicants who submit their application packages electronically via http://www.Grants.gov will receive two email acknowledgements from that website:

  • An automatic acknowledgement of the application's submission that will provide a Grants.gov tracking number.

  • An acknowledgement that the submitted application package has passed or failed a series of checks and validations.

4. Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs:

State Single Point of Contact (SPOC)

This program is covered under Executive Order (E.O.) 12372, "Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs," and 45 CFR Part 100, "Intergovernmental Review of Department of Health and Human Services Programs and Activities".  Under the Executive Order, States may design their own processes for reviewing and commenting on proposed Federal assistance under covered programs.

Applicants should go to the following URL for the official list of the jurisdictions that have elected to participate in E.O. 12372 http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants_spoc/.

Applicants from participating jurisdictions should contact their SPOC, as soon as possible, to alert them of their prospective applications and to receive instructions on their jurisdiction's procedures.  Applicants must submit all required application materials to the SPOC and indicate the date of submission on the Standard Form (SF) 424 at item 19.

Under 45 CFR 100.8(a)(2), a SPOC has 60 days from the application due date to comment on proposed new awards.

SPOC comments may be submitted directly to ACF to: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Office of Grants Management, Division of Discretionary Grants, 370 L'Enfant Promenade SW., 6th Floor East, Washington, DC 20447.

Entities that meet the eligibility requirements of this announcement are still eligible to apply for a grant even if a State, Territory or Commonwealth, etc., does not have a SPOC or has chosen not to participate in the process.  Applicants from non-participating jurisdictions need take no action with regard to E.O. 12372.  Applications from Federally-recognized Indian Tribal governments are not subject to E.O. 12372.

5. Funding Restrictions:

Costs of organized fund raising, including financial campaigns, endowment drives, solicitation of gifts and bequests, and similar expenses incurred solely to raise capital or obtain contributions, are unallowable under this grant award.

Grant awards will not allow reimbursement of pre-award costs.

Construction is not an allowable activity or expenditure under this grant award.

This grant program meets the ACF definition for training grants.  Therefore, applicants must limit the indirect cost rate to eight percent of total direct costs, exclusive of equipment, tuition and stipends, rental of space, major contracts or subgrants and renovation and alteration, under this program announcement.

Applicants should include in their budget funds to pay for travel expenses to attend at least one ADD-sponsored Project Director's two-day meeting in Washington, DC.

6. Other Submission Requirements:

Submit applications to one of the following addresses:

Submission by Mail

Tim Chappelle
Grant Management Officer
Division of Discretionary Grants
Office of Grants Management
370 L'Enfant Promenade, SW
Aerospace Building, 6th Floor East
Washington, DC 20447

Hand Delivery

Tim Chappelle
Grant Management Officer
Division of Discretionary Grants
370 L'Enfant Promenade, 6th Floor East
Washington, DC 20201

Electronic Submission

See Section IV.2 for application requirements and for guidance when submitting applications electronically via http://www.Grants.gov.

For all submissions, see Section IV.3 for information on due dates.




V. APPLICATION REVIEW INFORMATION

1. CRITERIA:

Competing applications for financial assistance will be reviewed and evaluated against the criteria described in this section. The corresponding score values indicate the relative importance that ACF places on each review criterion. Applicants should address these criteria in the process of developing their application, as they are the basis upon which their applications will be judged. Application components may be organized such that a reviewer will be able to follow a seamless and logical flow of information (i.e., from a broad overview of the project to more detailed information about how it will be conducted).

OBJECTIVES AND NEED FOR ASSISTANCE - 15 points

Using the following values for each required item in this criterion, points will be awarded according to the extent to which the application:

  • Clearly identifies and provides a portrait of the physical, economic, social, financial, institutional, and/or other problems that substantiates the need for the partnership with at least one minority-serving institution. In doing so, uses relevant and current data, including that collected through planning studies and/or focus groups with minority populations. (4 points)

  • Clearly describes needs specific to at least one minority-serving institution that will be a member of the partnership and provides evidence that feedback from the minority-serving institution was utilized in developing the project approach, including the goals and goal-related activities outlined in the partnership plan. (4 points)

  • Describes how the UCEDD's Consumer Advisory Committee was consulted in the development of the application and provides evidence that feedback from the CAC was utilized in developing the project approach, including the goals and goal-related activities outlined in the partnership plan. (2 points)

  • Provides a conceptual framework for the partnership contextualized in a range of strategies that will be used to exchange and transfer knowledge between the UCEDD and the minority-serving institution, such as faculty and student exchanges, course exchanges, joint course offerings, joint course development, joint research, collaborative community-based training, and/or joint service projects.  (2 points)

  • Shows a direct relationship between the needs identified based on research and/or planning studies, feedback from the minority-serving institution, and the CAC and the goals and goal-related activities in the partnership plan.

  • Supporting documentation, such as letters of support and testimonials from concerned interests other than the applicant are included (1 point).


APPROACH - 40 points

Using the following values for each required item in this criterion, points will be awarded according to the extent to which the application:

  • Clearly outlines an overall three-year partnership plan of action for a two-way knowledge exchange and transfer program between at least one UCEDD and at least one minority-serving institution that includes projected measurable and attainable goals describing the scope and detail of how the proposed partnership work will be accomplished. (6 points)  |

  • Includes in the plan one or more efforts that result in a benefit to members of a minority population with disabilities that, at a minimum (1) enhances their ability to contribute to ongoing or new research, training (e.g., pre-service, continuing education, community-based), or service initiatives of the partnership, (2) provides access to on-going initiatives that have been expanded to include minority populations with disabilities, and (3) empowers them to advocate for themselves in seeking opportunities and services in their communities.(5 points) 

  • Describes how the faculty and students at the minority-serving institution directly engaged in the partnership will provide the UCEDD directly engaged in the project with assistance in recruiting from minority populations with disabilities to: (1) obtain greater minority participation to on-going UCEDD research, training (e.g., pre-service, continuing education, community-based), and/or service project(s); (2) launch a new one that includes a minority cohort; or (3) launch one focused exclusively on a minority population with disabilities. (5 points)

  • Provides quantitative projections of the accomplishments to be achieved by the partnership and a chronological order of approach with target dates. (3 points)

  • Identfies for each institution engaged (e.g., the UCEDD, minority-serving institution) a plan outlining the roles and responsibilities tied to specific on-going or planned activity. (5 points)

  • Identifies and delineates the UCEDD's role and involvement in coordinated activities of the partnership (3 points)

  • Identifies a variety of strategies to exchange and transfer knowledge between at least one UCEDD and at least one minority-serving institution. Such strategies may be faculty and student exchanges, course exchanges, joint course offerings, joint course development, joint research, collaborative community-based training, and/or joint service projects. (4 points)

  • Describes how faculty and students from minority-serving institution directly engaged in the partnership will be exposed to the benefits of interdisciplinary research, training (e.g., pre-service, continuing education, community-based), and service. (3 points)

  • Describes how faculty, staff, and students from the UCEDD directly engaged in the partnership will be exposed to the importance of culture, custom, and tradition in reaching out to and seeking the involvement of minority individuals with disabilities and their families in initiatives that could affect their lives. (3 points)

  • Describes how faculty and students from the minority-serving institution directly engaged in the partnership will be exposed to the range of funding opportunities that UCEDDs pursue and how to do the same, especially through partnerships. (3 points)

DISSEMINATION PLAN - 10 points

Points will be awarded according to the extent to which the application describes how at least annually information about the partnership experience will be shared with the UCEDD Network and minority-serving institutions using a variety of methods (e.g., national meetings, written products, or national teleconferences using web-based technologies), including (5 points)

  • What the partnership is doing or has accomplished
  • How it is structured
  • How the resources are allocated
  • The sequence and timing of partnership activities
  • Future plans for collaboration with each other

Points will be awarded according to the extent to which the application describes how this project will serve as a catalyst for replication initiatives by (1) identifying how the project will generate critical elements as a basis for future collaboration between members of a similar partnership. (5 points)

EVALUATION - 15 points

Using the following values for each required item in this criterion, points will be awarded according to the extent to which the application provides a narrative describing how implementation and results of the partnership will be evaluated and clearly outlines the methodology that:

  • Includes criteria for determining the extent to which the project has achieved its stated objectives and the extent to which the accomplishment of objectives can be attributed to the partnership. (5 points)

  • Defines the procedures to be used to determine whether the project is being conducted in a manner consistent with the work plan presented. (3 points)

  • Identifies the criteria for determining the results and benefits (e.g., impact) of the partnership using indicators for determining the transfer knowledge between the participating partners. Examples of indicators follow (7 points):
    • Faculty and students from minority-serving institutions are exposed to the benefits of interdisciplinary research, training (e.g., pre-service, continuing education, community-based), and service; 

    • Faculty and students from UCEDDs are exposed to the importance of culture, custom, and tradition in reaching out to and seeking the involvement of minority individuals with disabilities and their families in initiatives that could affect their lives.

    • Faculty and students from minority-serving institutions are exposed to the range of funding opportunities that UCEDDs pursue and how to do the same, especially through partnerships.

    • UCEDDs are provided with assistance of faculty and students from minority-serving institutions to recruit from minority populations with disabilities to: (1) obtain greater minority participation to on-going UCEDD research, training (e.g., pre-service, continuing education, community-based), and/or service project(s); (2) launch a new one that includes a minority cohort; or (3) launch one focused exclusively on a minority population with disabilities.

    • The project identifies critical elements for future collaboration between members of a partnership. The experiences from the partnership are shared with other UCEDDs and minority-serving institutions and serve as a catalyst for replication initiatives.

STAFF AND POSITION DATA - 10 points

Using the following values for each required item in this criterion, points will be awarded according to the extent to which the application:

  • Provides a biographical sketch and job description for each key person appointed. (3 points)

  • Job descriptions for each vacant key position are included. (2 points)

  • Provides evidence that adequate staff time has been allocated to carry out activities related to the partnership plan. (5 points)


ORGANIZATIONAL PROFILE - 10 points

Using the following values for each required item in this criterion, points will be awarded according to the extent to which the application:

  • Provides information on the UCEDD's expertise and ability to implement a partnership grant (3 points)

  • Identifies as a primary partner a qualified minority-serving institution. A qualified minority-serving institutions is one that is identified in Title III and Title V of the Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008 as a Tribally Controlled Colleges and Universities;  Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian-Serving Institutions; Predominantly Black Institutions; Hispanic-Serving Institutions; and Minority Science and Engineering Improvements Programs. A full listing of minority institutions recognized by the U.S. Department of Education as accredited postsecondary minority institutions can be found at http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/edlite-minorityinst-list-tab.html. (5 points)

  • The minority-serving institution identified to participate in the partnership is unique to the UCEDD Network (e.g., it is an institute of higher education that does not currently receive funding from ADD to support a UCEDD). (2 points)

2. Review and Selection Process:

No grant award will be made under this announcement on the basis of an incomplete application.

Initial ACF Screening: Each application will be screened to determine whether it was received by the closing date and time and whether the requested amount exceeds the stated ceiling.   Late applications or those exceeding the funding limit will be returned to the applicants with a notation that they were unacceptable and will not be reviewed.

The grant applications that pass the initial screening will undergo a rigorous review process that follows the requirements of Section 154(c) of the DD Act. This shall include the following:

(1)   Peer Review. All applications submitted shall undergo a technical and qualitative review by peer review groups. Each peer review group will be comprised of approximately three people and shall include individuals with disabilities and parents, guardians, or advocates of or for individuals with developmental disabilities.

(2)   Supplemental Review. Should the peer review group determine that further review is necessary to make a decision to recommend an application for funding, it will advise ADD of its determination.  The peer review group may conduct site visits as part of the supplemental review before recommending an application for funding. 

(3)   Recommendation for Funding. The peer review group will make a recommendation for funding an application. The recommendations for funding will be the following: 

a.      Recommended for funding

b.      Not recommended for funding

c.      Need additional information before making a recommendation for funding

ADD may approve an application only if the application has been recommended by the peer review group, unless the requirement for such review and recommendation has been waived by the Secretary [see Section 154(c)].

ADD may consider other factors or elements, other than the evaluation criteria, such as the UCEDD's past performance, whether the minority-serving institution is recognized as such, and geographical dispersion and diversity, in reviewing and selecting applications.

Please refer to Section IV.2 of this announcement for information on non-Federal reviewers in the review process.

Approved but Unfunded Applications

Applications that are approved but unfunded may be held over for funding in the next funding cycle, pending the availability of funds, for a period not to exceed one year.

3. Anticipated Announcement and Award Dates:

Not Applicable.


VI. AWARD ADMINISTRATION INFORMATION

1. Award Notices:

Successful applicants will be notified through the issuance of a Notice of Award (NoA) document that sets forth the amount of funds granted, the terms and conditions of the grant, the effective date of the grant, the budget period for which initial support will be given, the non-Federal share to be provided (if applicable), and the total project period for which support is contemplated. The NoA will be signed by the Grants Officer and transmitted via postal mail.

Following the finalization of funding decisions, organizations whose applications will not be funded will be notified by letter, signed by the Program Office head.

2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements:

Grantees are subject to the administrative requirements in 45 CFR Part 74 (for non-governmental entities) or 45 CFR Part 92 (for governmental entities).

Direct Federal grants, sub-award funds, or contracts under this ACF program shall not be used to support inherently religious activities such as religious instruction, worship, or proselytization. Therefore, organizations must take steps to separate, in time or location, their inherently religious activities from the services funded under this program.  Regulations pertaining to the Equal Treatment for Faith-Based Organizations, which includes the prohibition against Federal funding of inherently religious activities, can be found at the HHS web site at: http://www.hhs.gov/fbci/waisgate21.pdf.

A faith-based organization receiving HHS funds retains its independence from Federal, State, and local governments, and may continue to carry out its mission, including the definition, practice, and expression of its religious beliefs. For example, a faith-based organization may use space in its facilities to provide secular programs or services funded with Federal funds without removing religious art, icons, scriptures, or other religious symbols. In addition, a faith-based organization that receives Federal funds retains its authority over its internal governance, and it may retain religious terms in its organization's name, select its board members on a religious basis, and include religious references in its organization's mission statements and other governing documents in accordance with all program requirements, statutes, and other applicable requirements governing the conduct of HHS funded activities.

Additional information on "Understanding the Regulations Related to the Faith-Based and Community Initiative" can be found at: http://www.hhs.gov/fbci/regulations/index.html.

HHS Grants Policy Statement

The HHS Grants Policy Statement (GPS) is the Department of Health and Human Services new single policy guide for discretionary grants and cooperative agreements. Unlike previous HHS policy documents, the GPS is intended to be shared with and used by grantees. It became effective October 1, 2006 and is applicable to all Operating Divisions (OPDIVS), such as the Administration for Children and Families (ACF), except the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The GPS covers basic grants processes, standard terms and conditions, and points of contact, as well as important OPDIV-specific requirements. Appendices include a glossary of terms and a list of standard abbreviations for ease of reference. The GPS may be accessed at http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_related.html.

3. Reporting Requirements:

Grantees will be required to submit performance progress and financial reports periodically throughout the project period. Frequency of reporting is listed later in this section.

Beginning with FY 2009 awards, most ACF grantees will begin using the a Standard Form (SF) for required performance progress reporting (PPR). The SF-PPR is a standard government-wide performance progress reporting format consisting of a series of forms implemented by Federal agencies to collect performance information from award recipients. Most ACF grantees will begin using the standard format implemented through ACF's Office of Grants Management (OGM), entitled the "ACF-OGM-SF-PPR." Use of the ACF-OGM-SF-PPR will begin for new awards and continuation awards made by ACF in FY 2009. At a minimum, grantees will be required to submit the ACF-OGM-SF-PPR, which consists of the ACF-OGM-SF-PPR Coversheet and the ACF-OGM-SF-PPR Appendix B Program Indicators.

ACF Programs that utilize other SF-PPR reporting formats, or other reporting forms or formats that differ from the new ACF-OGM-SF-PPR, have listed those forms or formats below. Grant award documents will inform grantees of the appropriate performance progress report form or format to use beginning in FY 2009.

Grantees will continue to use the Financial Status Report (FSR) SF-269 (long form) for required financial reporting.

The SF-269 (long form) and the ACF-OGM-SF-PPR may be found at http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_resources.html. Grantees should consult their award documents to determine the appropriate performance progress report format required under their award.

Performance progress and financial reports are due 30 days after the end of the reporting period. Final program performance and financial reports are due 90 days after the close of the project period.

Final reports may be submitted in hard copy to the Grants Management Office Contact listed in Section VII. of this announcement.

Program Progress Reports: Quarterly
Financial Reports: Semi-Annually




VII. AGENCY CONTACTS

Program Office Contact:

Jennifer G. Johnson, Ed.D.
Administration on Developmental Disabilities
Administration for Children and Families
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
200 Independence Ave, SW
Room 405-D
Washington, DC 20201
Phone:  202-690-5982
Fax: 202-205-8037
Email: jennifer.johnson@acf.hhs.gov

For hearing or speech impaired callers, contact the Federal Relay Service at 1-800-877-8339 (TTY (Text Telephone) / ASCII (American Standard Code For Information Interchange)).

Grants Management Office Contact:

Tim Chappelle, Grants Officer
Office of Grants Management
Administration for Children and Families
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
370 L' Enfant Promenade, SW.
Mail Stop: 6th Floor East
Washington, DC 20447
Phone:  202-401-4855
Fax: 202-401-5468
Email: tichappelle@acf.hhs.gov

For hearing or speech impaired callers, contact the Federal Relay Service at 1-800-877-8339 (TTY (Text Telephone) / ASCII (American Standard Code For Information Interchange)).




VIII. OTHER INFORMATION

Visit http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/add/ to learn more about ADD and the UCEDD program.

Checklist

You may use the checklist below as a guide when preparing your application package.

What to SubmitWhere FoundWhen to Submit

Letter of Intent

Referenced in Section IV.2 of the announcement.

By application due date found in Overview and Section IV.3.

SF-424

Referenced in Section IV.2 under "Forms" and found at http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_resources.html

By application due date found in Overview and Section IV.3.

SF-424A

Referenced in Section IV.2 under "Forms" and found at http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_resources.html

By application due date found in Overview and Section IV.3.

Budget and Budget Justification

Referenced in Section IV.2 of the announcement.

By application due date found in Overview and Section IV.3.

Indirect Cost Rate Agreement

Found in Section V.1

By application due date

Documentation of Non-Federal Resources

Referenced in Section IV.2 of the announcement under "Project Description."

By application due date found in Overview and Section IV.3.

Proof of Non-Profit Status

Referenced in Section IV.2 of the announcement under "Eligibility Certification."

By date of award.

SF-424B

Referenced in Section IV.2 under "Forms" and found at http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_resources.html

By application due date found in Overview and Section IV.3.

Certification Regarding Lobbying

Referenced in Section IV.2 of the announcement under "Certifications" and found at http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_resources.html

By date of award.

SF-LLL

"Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying" is referenced in Section IV.2 under "Certifications" and found at http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_resources.html
Submission of this form is required if any funds have been paid, or will be paid, to any person for influencing, or attempting to influence, an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan.

By application due date found in Overview and Section IV.3.

This program is covered under E.O. 12372, "Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs," and 45 CFR Part 100, "Intergovernmental Review of Department of Health and Human Services Programs and activities". Applicants must submit all required application materials to the State Single Point of Contact (SPOC) and indicate the date of submission on the Standard Form (SF) 424 at item 19.

Applicants should go to the following URL for the official list of the jurisdictions that have elected to participate in E.O. 12372 http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants_spoc/ as indicated in Section IV.4 of this announcement.

By application due date found in Overview and Section IV.3.

Table of Contents

Referenced in Section IV.2 of the announcement.

By application due date found in Overview and Section IV.3.

Project Summary/Abstract

Referenced in Section IV.2 of the announcement.

By application due date found in Overview and Section IV.3.

Project Description

Referenced in Section IV.2 of the announcement.

By application due date found in Overview and Section IV.3.

Letters of Support

Referenced in Section IV.2 of the announcement under "Project Description."

By application due date found in Overview and Section IV.3.

Third-Party Agreements

Referenced in Section IV.2 of the announcement under "Project Description."

By application due date found in Overview and Section IV.3.

Appendix

Found in Section I.V.

-







Date:  5/13/2009Faith T. McCormick
Acting Commissioner
Administration on Developmental Disabilities


Posted on May 20, 2009





EXPIRED