Skip Navigation
acfbanner  
ACF
Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families
          
ACF Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News   |   HHS Home

  Questions?  |  Privacy  |  Site Index  |  Contact Us  |  Download Reader™Download Reader  |  Print Print      


Children's Bureau Safety, Permanency, Well-being  Advanced
 Search

Home > Child Welfare Monitoring > Results of the 2001 and 2002 Child and Family Services Reviews > Table of Contents > Strength Ratings for Permanency Outcome 1 Indicators

 

First     Previous     Next     Last

Table of Contents       Text Only Version

 

Slide 24 of 58

Notes: The indicators displayed here are used to evaluate Permanency Outcome 1 in the onsite review, and are as follows:

Re-entries into foster care: For the cases reviewed in 2002 only, this indicator was determined to be a strength by reviewers in 85% of the cases.

Stability of foster care placements: For cases reviewed in both 2001 and 2002, reviewers determined this indicator to be a strength in 78% of the cases.

Permanency goal for the child: For cases reviewed in both 2001 and 2002, reviewers determined that the agency had established the appropriate permanency goal in a timely manner in 67% of the cases.

Timeliness of achieving reunification, guardianship, or permanent relative placement: For cases reviewed in 2002 only, reviewers determined that the indicator was a strength in 71% of the cases.

Timeliness of achieving adoption: For cases reviewed in both 2001 and 2002, reviewers determined this indicator to be a strength in 57% of the cases. Among the cases reviewed in 2002 only, reviewers determined the indicator to be a strength in 40% of the cases.

Permanency goal of other permanent planned living arrangement (OPPLA): For cases reviewed in both 2001 and 2002, reviewers determined this indicator to be a strength in 70% of the cases.

 

Strength Ratings for Permanency Outcome 1 Indicators

This vertical bar chart shows indicators used to evaluate permanency outcome 1 in the onsite review. They indicate that Re-entries into foster care: For the cases reviewed in 2002 only, this indicator was determined to be a strength by reviewers in 85% of the cases. Stability of foster care placements: For cases reviewed in both 2001 and 2002, reviewers determined this indicator to be a strength in 78% of the cases. Permanency goal for the child: For cases reviewed in both 2001 and 2002, reviewers determined that the agency had established the appropriate permanency goal in a timely manner in 67% of the cases. Timeliness of achieving reunification, guardianship, or permanent relative placement: For cases reviewed in 2002 only, reviewers determined that the indicator was a strength in 71% of the cases. Timeliness of achieving adoption: For cases reviewed in both 2001 and 2002, reviewers determined this indicator to be a strength in 57% of the cases. Among the cases reviewed in 2002 only, reviewers determined the indicator to be a strength in 40% of the cases. Permanency goal of other permanent planned living arrangement (OPPLA): For cases reviewed in both 2001 and 2002, reviewers determined this indicator to be a strength in 70% of the cases.