|
|---|
|
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|||
| ACF Home | Services | Working with ACF | Policy/Planning | About ACF | ACF News | HHS Home | ||||
Questions?
|
Privacy
|
Site Index
|
Contact Us
|
Download Reader™
|
Print
|
|---|
 |
|
Table of Contents Text Only Version
Slide 41 of 58 |
Notes: Among the cases reviewed in 2002, there were statistically significant differences in the ratings for in-home services cases and foster care cases on four indicators, as follows:
Risk of harm (Item 4): 73% of the in-home cases were rated as strengths, compared to 87% of the foster care cases.
Caseworker visits with children: 69% of the in-home cases were rated as strengths, compared to 77% of the foster care cases.
Providing educational services to children: 74% of the in-home cases were rated as strengths, compared to 88% of the foster care cases.
Providing mental health services to children: 64% of the in-home cases were rated as strengths, compared to 77% of the foster care cases.
Among the cases reviewed in 2002, there were statistically significant differences in the ratings for in-home services cases and foster care cases on four indicators, as follows: Risk of harm (Item 4): 73% of the in-home cases were rated as strengths, compared to 87% of the foster care cases. Caseworker visits with children: 69% of the in-home cases were rated as strengths, compared to 77% of the foster care cases. Providing educational services to children: 74% of the in-home cases were rated as strengths, compared to 88% of the foster care cases. Providing mental health services to children: 64% of the in-home cases were rated as strengths, compared to 77% of the foster care cases.
