|
|---|
|
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|||
| ACF Home | Services | Working with ACF | Policy/Planning | About ACF | ACF News | HHS Home | ||||
Questions?
|
Privacy
|
Site Index
|
Contact Us
|
Download Reader™
|
Print
|
|---|
 |
|
Table of Contents Text Only Version
Slide 44 of 58 |
Notes: This slide rank orders the individual indicators used to evaluate the outcomes for all cases reviewed in both 2001 and 2002, according to the percentage of cases reviewed in which the indicator was rated as a strength in the case. For example, among all the cases reviewed across the two years, reviewers determined that Placement Proximity was substantially achieved in 96% of the cases.
These results only include indicators where the results from the 2001 cases and the 2002 cases could be combined meaningfully. For those indicators where the definitions were changed in 2002, the results are not combined.
Strongest Indicators
Placement Proximity (96%)
Recurrence of Maltx (92%)
Placement with siblings (87%)
Relative Placements (85%)
Weakest Indicators
Adoption (57%)
Needs & Services (66%)
Family Involvement (66%)
Permanency Goal (67%)
