The Onsite Review Instrument is used to review both foster care and in-home services cases during the onsite review component of the Child and Family Services Reviews (CFSRs) of State child welfare agencies. In completing the Onsite Review Instrument, reviewers will conduct case file reviews and case-related interviews with children, parents, foster parents, caseworkers, and other professionals involved with the child.
The instrument is organized into a Face Sheet and three sections. On the Face Sheet, reviewers document general information about a case, such as the type of case. Reviewers are to document the names of individuals involved in the case on the Face Sheet. For the remainder of the instrument, reviewers are not to use proper names, but should use titles (for example, biological mother, target child, caseworker, etc.) when referencing individuals. When it is necessary to identify a child to clarify a response on the instrument, enter the child's first name only. No surnames are to appear anywhere in the instrument, except on the first page.
The three sections focus on the outcome domains that form the basis of the CFSRs: safety, permanency, and child and family well-being. For each outcome, reviewers collect information on a number of "items" related to that outcome.
While reviewers use the Onsite Review Instrument to review both foster care and in-home services cases, they complete the permanency section only if the case under review is a foster care case.
For children in foster care, reviewers should consider the Safety items (1 through 4) for all children in the family, but complete the Permanency items (5 through 16) and the Child and Family Well-Being items (17 through 23) only as they apply to the specific child whose case is under review. For children receiving in-home services, reviewers should apply the Safety and Child and Family Well-Being items to all the children in the family who are residing with, and included in services to, the family.
Reviewers must answer all the questions for each applicable item. If the question is not applicable to the case, then Not Applicable (NA) should be marked for that question.
Reviewers should document relevant and supporting information in the Reason for Rating and Documentation section at the end of each item. It is critical that reviewers document in this space the information gathered from the case record and interviews that supports the responses to the questions and indicate the source of the information (for example, during the interview with the biological mother she stated that she visits with the child weekly). While the instrument provides directions on where to find information, reviewers should use their professional judgment to determine how best to gather all the relevant information. Further direction for answering the questions relating to the individual items is provided below the relevant question.
July 2008 |
OMB Control No: 0970-0214
Expiration date: 1/31/2010 |
CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES REVIEWS
ONSITE REVIEW INSTRUMENT
Face Sheet |
A. Name of State and county (or local area):
|
B. Case name:
|
C. Period under review:
|
Instructions:
- For the local area, use the name that is used by the State for the review. This may be a region rather than a county, or may be multiple counties.
- Enter the case name that is the official name on the case file.
- The period under review is the timeframe used for making decisions about the case.
|
D. Federal Reviewer:
State Reviewer |
E. Date case reviewed:
|
F. Complete the chart below:
Instructions:
- For both foster care cases and in-home services cases, enter the first and last names (first name first) of all children in the family as identified in the case file. If the case is a foster care case, mark the checkbox next to the name of the target child. It is essential that the target child be clearly identified for all foster care cases.
- Enter the race/ethnicity information as provided in the case file. If the child is of two or more races/ethnicities, list all that are provided in the case file (for example, White and Hispanic, or White and Native American, etc.). If during the course of the interviews, it is learned that a child is of a different race/ethnicity than is noted in the file or is of two or more races and only one is noted in the file (for example, Native American instead of Hispanic, or both Hispanic and Native American), please change the race identification information presented below to reflect the accurate information.
- Provide the date of birth for all children in the family, even if this is a foster care case.
|
| Target Child: |
Child(ren)'s name(s): |
Race and/or ethnicity: |
Date(s) of birth (MM/DD/YY): |
Gender: |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
G. Type of case reviewed:
 |
Foster Care Case |
|
In-home Services Case |
|
Instructions:
- The case is a foster care case if the target child was in foster care at any time during the period under review. A child is considered to be in foster care if the State child welfare agency (hereafter "the agency") has care and placement responsibility for the child. This includes a child who is placed by the agency with relatives or in other kin-type placements, but the agency maintains care and placement responsibility. It does not include a child who is living with relatives (or caregivers other than parents) but who is not under the care and placement responsibility of the agency.
- The case is an in-home services case if no child in the family was in foster care at any time during the period under review, and the case was open for at least 60 days. If the case was not open for 60 days, please notify the Local Site Leader.
|
| H. Was this case opened for reasons other than child abuse and neglect? |
| Yes |
|
No |
|
|
Instructions:
- Examples of cases opened for reasons other than child abuse or neglect include the following: (1) cases opened because of the child's behavior, including juvenile delinquency, substance abuse, or "child in need of supervision," and there were no maltreatment concerns in the family; or (2) cases for which the reasons for contact with the family were not related to child abuse or neglect.
|
| I. Date of most recent case opening for all cases (MM/DD/YY): |
Instructions:
- Provide the date that the case was actually opened within the agency. If a child was on a trial home visit and returned to a foster care placement, it is not considered a "case opening" unless the trial home visit was longer than 6 months and there was no court order extending the trial home visit beyond 6 months.
- If the family received in-home services before the removal of a child and placement of the child in foster care and the case was not closed prior to placement, reviewers should enter the date that the case was opened for in-home services. The date of the child's removal from home will be captured in the next item.
|
| J. Date of the child's most recent entry into foster care (MM/DD/YY): |
Not Applicable |
|
|
Definitions and Instructions:
- "Entry into foster care" refers to a child's removal from his or her normal place of residence and placement in a substitute care setting under the care and placement responsibility of the State or local title IV-E/IV-B agency. Children are considered to have entered foster care if the child has been in substitute care for 24 hours or more.
- If a child was on a trial home visit and returned to a foster care placement, the return is not considered an "entry into foster care" unless the trial home visit was longer than 6 months and there was no court order extending the trial home visit beyond 6 months.
- If the case is an in-home services case, check Not Applicable.
|
K. Date of discharge from foster care for the most recent foster care episode (MM/DD/YY):
| Not Applicable |
|
Not Yet Discharged |
|
|
Definitions and Instructions:
- "Discharge from foster care" is defined as the point when the child is no longer in foster care under the care and placement responsibility or supervision of the agency.
- If a child returns home on a trial home visit and the agency retains responsibility or supervision of the child, the child should be considered discharged from foster care only if the trial home visit was longer than 6 months, and there was no court order extending the trial home visit beyond 6 months.
- If the child is in foster care but has not yet been discharged, check Not Yet Discharged.
- If the case is an in-home services case, check Not Applicable.
|
L. Date of case closure (for all cases) (MM/DD/YY):
| Case not closed by time of review |
|
|
Instructions:
- Provide the date that the agency officially closed the case. For foster care cases, this may or may not be the same date as the discharge date.
- If the case is still open at the time of review, check "Case not closed by time of review."
|
| M. Reason for agency involvement: |
Instructions:
- Indicate the reason for the agency's involvement with this child or family for the most recent case opening. Check all reasons that apply.
- Place an asterisk next to the square that indicates the primary reason that the case was opened. It is essential that the primary reason is identified with an asterisk.
|
Physical Abuse |
|
Abandonment |
|
Substance abuse by child |
|
Sexual abuse |
|
Mental/physical health of parent |
|
Domestic violence in child's home |
|
Emotional maltreatment |
|
Mental/physical health of child |
|
Child in juvenile justice system |
|
Neglect (not including medical neglect) |
|
Substance abuse by parent(s) |
|
Other (specify) |
|
Medical neglect |
|
Child's behavior |
|
|
|
| N. Persons interviewed by the reviewers (list below): |
| Relationship to Case |
Date of Interview |
Type of Interview |
| |
|
|
In-Person |
|
Phone |
|
| |
|
|
In-Person |
|
Phone |
|
| |
|
|
In-Person |
|
Phone |
|
| |
|
|
In-Person |
|
Phone |
|
THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT OF 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13)
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 8 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, reading case files and conducting interviews, and reviewing the collection of information.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
| SECTION I: SAFETY |
| SAFETY OUTCOME 1: CHILDREN ARE, FIRST AND FOREMOST, PROTECTED FROM ABUSE AND NEGLECT. |
| Item 1: Timeliness of initiating investigations of reports of child maltreatment (case file and interview with caseworker) |
| Purpose of Assessment: To determine whether responses to all accepted child maltreatment reports received during the period under review were initiated, and face-to-face contact with the child made, within the timeframes established by agency policies or State statute. |
Applicable Cases:
- Cases are applicable for an assessment of this item if an accepted child maltreatment report on any child in the family was received during the period under review. "Accepted" means that the report was assigned to the agency to conduct an assessment or investigation. This includes reports assigned for an "alternative response" assessment. Reports that are screened out are not considered "accepted." "Alternative response" refers to an agency's approach to addressing child maltreatment reports that meet agency criteria for acceptance but at the initial screening do not meet the agency's requirements for a mandated investigation. For example, the agency's policy may be that reports that appear to present low to moderate risk to the child may be referred for a family assessment, rather than an investigation. Under such a response, no determination of child maltreatment is made. The alternative response may include an assessment to determine the safety of the child(ren), the risk of maltreatment, and the family's strengths and needs. The assessment may lead the State agency to provide services to eliminate or lessen the safety concerns and maltreatment risks.
- Cases are Not Applicable for an assessment of this item if, during the period under review, there were no child maltreatment reports on any child in the family, or if a report was received on a child in the family but was "screened out, " that is, not referred for an assessment or investigation.
|
| Is this case applicable? (Select the appropriate response. If the response is "No," complete question A1, then rate the case as Not Applicable in the ratings section, provide your reason for the rating in the documentation section, and continue to item 2.) |
| Yes |
|
|
| No |
|
|
| |
Number |
| A1. How many reports of suspected abuse or neglect have been received on any child(ren) in the family (including those that were screened out by the agency) during the life of the case? |
|
Instructions:
- The information collected in question A1 is intended to provide background information on the family. It is not to be used to determine the rating.
- The life of the case begins with the first recorded maltreatment report received by the agency on any child in the family, even if the report was screened out.
- For foster care cases, reviewers should record the total number of reports of child maltreatment for all children in the family, not just the child in foster care.
|
| |
Number |
| A2. How many accepted reports alleging abuse or neglect were received on any child(ren) in the family during the period under review (i.e., they were not screened out)? |
|
Instructions for completing the table below:
- Complete the following table for all accepted reports received during the period under review.
- The date the investigation or assessment was initiated is the date that the agency made the first attempt to contact the family.
- The date assigned for an investigation or assessment is the date the report is assigned to a specific worker to conduct the investigation or assessment (unless the State policy has a different definition for "assigned").
- Under date assigned for investigation or assessment, indicate what action was taken (i.e., was the report investigated or referred for assessment?).
- In the last column, report the disposition of the case (for example, substantiated, indicated, not substantiated, unfounded, etc.). If the case was not investigated and, therefore, did not have a disposition, indicate whether it was opened for services.
|
| Report Date |
First Name of Child |
Allegation |
Priority Level (if Applicable) |
Date Assigned for an investigation or Assessment |
Date Investigation or Assessment Initiated |
Date of Face-to-Face Contact With Child |
Relationship of Alleged Perpetrator to Child |
Disposition |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Number |
| B. In how many of the reports listed above was the investigation NOT initiated in accordance with the State's timeframes and requirements for a report of that priority? |
|
| C. In how many of the reports listed above was face-to-face contact with the child(ren) who is the subject of the report NOT made in accordance with the State's timeframes and requirements for a report of that priority? (If the State does not have a written policy regarding face-to-face contact, check with your Local Site Leader to determine how this factor is to be assessed.) |
|
| D. For all reports identified in B and C, were the reasons for the delays due to circumstances beyond the control of the agency? |
Yes
|
No
|
NA
|
|
Instructions:
- If the answers to both questions B and C are zero, the answer to question D should be Not Applicable (NA).
- Delays in services provided by organizations or agencies under contract with the agency would not be considered to be beyond the control of the agency. However, where services are provided by another public State or local agency, such as law enforcement, the actions of these agencies may be beyond the control of the child welfare agency.
|
Rating Criteria:
Item 1 should be rated as a Strength if either of the following applies:
- The answers to B and C are zero.
- The answers to B or C are greater than zero, but the answer to D is Yes.
Item 1 should be rated as an Area Needing Improvement if the following applies:
- The answer to B or C is greater than zero, and the answer to D is No.
|
| SAFETY OUTCOME 1: CHILDREN ARE, FIRST AND FOREMOST, PROTECTED FROM ABUSE AND NEGLECT. |
| Item 2: Repeat maltreatment (case file and interview with caseworker) |
| Purpose of Assessment: To determine if any child in the family experienced repeat maltreatment within a 6-month period. |
Applicable Cases:
- A case is applicable if there was at least one maltreatment report involving any child in the family that met all of the following criteria: (1) it was received during the period under review, (2) it referred to a maltreatment incident that occurred during the period under review, and (3) it was investigated and determined to be "substantiated" or "indicated" (some States will have different terminology, such as "founded" rather than "substantiated"); or
- There was at least one maltreatment report involving any child in the family that met all of the following criteria: (1) it was received during the period under review, (2) it referred to a maltreatment incident that occurred during the period under review, and (3) it was referred for an assessment and the decision was made to open the case for services to address concerns relevant to the safety of at least one of the children in the family (this decision may have been made by the agency or by a private provider under contract with the agency).
Cases are not applicable for assessment of this item if either of the following applies:
- All maltreatment reports received during the period under review were "screened out," that is, the reports were neither investigated nor referred for an alternative response, or
- The only maltreatment report that was received and investigated or assessed during the period under review referred to an incident that occurred before the period under review.
|
| Is this case applicable? (Select the appropriate response. If the response is No, rate the case as Not Applicable in the ratings section, provide your reason for this rating in the documentation section, and continue to rate Safety Outcome 1.) |
| Yes |
|
|
| No |
|
|
A. During the period under review, was there:
- at least one substantiated or indicated maltreatment report involving any child in the family?
- at least one maltreatment report involving any child in the family that was referred for an assessment and the decision was made to open the case for services to address concerns relevant to the safety of at least one of the children in the family (this decision may have been made by the agency or by a private provider under contract with the agency)?
|
| Yes |
|
|
| No |
|
|
| Yes |
|
|
| No |
|
|
Definitions:
- "Substantiated" refers to an investigation in which the report of maltreatment or risk of maltreatment was supported or founded according to State law or policy. Reviewers should be aware that a State may have different terms for this and identify the correct terms.
- "Indicated" means that the investigation resulted in a reason to suspect maltreatment, but there was insufficient evidence to substantiate the report under State law or policy.
Instructions:
- Use the information provided in the table for item 1 to answer questions A1 and A2. The key information is provided in the columns pertaining to (1) the report date, (2) whether there was an assessment or an investigation, and (3) the disposition or whether the case was opened for services.
- If the answers to questions A1 and A2 are No, the case should be rated Not Applicable in the ratings section. Provide your reason in the documentation section, and move to the rating for Safety Outcome 1.
|
B. If the answer to either question A1 or A2 is Yes, within a 6-month period before or after any maltreatment report identified in question A:
- was there at least one additional substantiated or indicated maltreatment report involving any child in the family?
Or
- was there at least one additional maltreatment report involving any child in the family that was handled by an alternative response and resulted in a decision to open the case for services to address concerns relevant to the safety of at least one of the children in the family (the case may have been opened for services by the agency or by a private provider under contract with the agency)?
|
| Yes |
|
|
| No |
|
|
| Yes |
|
|
| No |
|
|
Instructions:
- Reviewers should answer No to questions B1 and B2 if the only additional maltreatment reports occurring within 6 months of one another referred to the same maltreatment incident identified in question A.
- Reviewers should be aware that sometimes when children come into contact with a child welfare agency they disclose maltreatment incidents that occurred prior to the maltreatment incident that brought them into contact with the agency. The agency then may investigate these earlier incidents. If the case under review involves this type of maltreatment report and the report was substantiated or indicated, please follow the instructions below:
- If the maltreatment report refers to an incident that occurred within 6 months before another maltreatment report received during the period under review, and the report is substantiated or indicated, then the answer to question B1 or B2 should be Yes.
- If the maltreatment report refers to an incident that occurred more than 6 months before another maltreatment report received during the period under review, then the answers to questions B1 and B2 should be No, even if the report is substantiated or indicated.
|
C. If the response to either question B1 or B2 is Yes, did:
- the report(s) identified in questions A and B above involve the same or similar circumstances?
Or
- any of the reports involve maltreatment of the child by the foster parents, members of the foster parents' family, other children in the foster home or facility, or facility staff members?
|
| Yes |
|
|
| No |
|
|
| NA |
|
|
| Yes |
|
|
| No |
|
|
| NA |
|
|
Instructions:
- If the answers to questions B1 and B2 are No, then the reviewers should answer Not Applicable (NA) to questions C1 and C2.
- Reviewers should answer No to question C1 if the answer to either question B1 or B2 is Yes, but there is no relationship between the circumstances involved in the two events. In determining the similarity of the circumstances, reviewers should consider the perpetrator of the maltreatment and other individuals involved in the incident.
- Reviewers should answer No to question C2 if the answer to either question B1 or B2 is Yes, but none of the substantiated or indicated maltreatment reports involved maltreatment of the child by the foster parents, members of the foster parents' family, other children in the foster home or facility, or facility staff members.
|
Rating Criteria:
Item 2 should be rated as a Strength if either of the following applies:
- The answer to either question A1 or A2 is Yes, and the answers to both questions B1 and B2 are No.
- The answers to both questions C1 and C2 are No or Not Applicable.
Item 2 should be rated as an Area Needing Improvement if the answer to at least one question in each of A, B, and C is Yes. |
| SAFETY OUTCOME 2: CHILDREN ARE SAFELY MAINTAINED IN THEIR HOMES WHENEVER POSSIBLE AND APPROPRIATE |
| Item 3: Services to family to protect child(ren) in the home and prevent removal or re-entry into foster care (case file and interviews with caseworker, parent(s), service providers) |
| Purpose of Assessment: To determine whether, during the period under review, the agency made concerted efforts to provide services to the family to prevent children's entry into foster care or re-entry after a reunification. |
Applicable Cases: A case is applicable for an assessment of this item if it meets at least one of the following criteria:
- It is an in-home services case and the reviewer determines that there are concerns regarding the safety of at least one child in the family during the period under review.
- It is an in-home services case and services were provided for children at risk of foster care placement to remain safely in their homes.
- It is a foster care case and the child entered foster care during the period under review due to safety concerns.
- It is a foster care case, the child was reunified during the period under review or was returned home on a trial basis, and the reviewer determines that there are concerns regarding the safety of that child in the home.
- It is a foster care case, and although the target child entered foster care before the period under review and remained in care for the entire period under review, there are other children in the home and the reviewer determines that there are concerns regarding the safety of these children during the period under review.
|
| Is this case applicable? (Select the appropriate response. If the response is No, rate the case as Not Applicable in the ratings section, provide your reason for the rating in the documentation section, and continue to item 4.) |
| Yes |
|
|
| No |
|
|
| A. For the period under review, did the agency make concerted efforts to provide or arrange for appropriate services for the family to protect children and prevent their entry into foster care or re-entry into foster care after a reunification? (Be sure to assess the entire period under review.) |
| Yes |
|
|
| No |
|
|
Definitions:
- "Appropriate services" for purposes of item 3 are those that are provided to, or arranged for, the family with the explicit goal of ensuring the child's safety, such as homemaking services, family preservation services, anger management classes, or substance abuse treatment services, etc., and that meet the specific needs or circumstances of the family. For example, if a parent's substance abuse is associated with the neglect that brought the case to the attention of the agency, then substance abuse treatment would be an appropriate service. If, in this situation, all that is offered is parenting education, then that service by itself would not be appropriate to address the safety issues. As another example, if there was domestic violence in the family and there was no effort to offer or provide domestic violence prevention services to the family, then the services would not be considered appropriate to ensure the child's safety. If a child needs mental health services, education-related services, or services to address behavioral problems, in most cases these would not be considered relevant to the child's safety if the child remained in the home. Efforts of the agency to meet these service needs are assessed in other items.
- "Appropriate services" also would include services provided to, or arranged for, a noncustodial parent, but only if the parent has contact with the child and there are safety concerns associated with that contact. It would not include services to assist the noncustodial parent in becoming a permanent caregiver.
- "Concerted efforts" for purposes of item 3 refers to the following activities: conducting a safety assessment to identify the services that are necessary to ensure the child's safety in the home, working to engage families in services, and facilitating a family's access to those services.
Instructions:
- In answering question A, focus only on whether the agency made concerted efforts to provide appropriate and relevant services to the family to address the safety issues in the family so that the child could remain in the home or would not re-enter foster care. Concerns about monitoring service participation and safety planning and assessment of progress made will be captured in item 4.
- If the agency removed the child from the home without making concerted efforts to provide services, the answer to question A should be No, even if the agency determined that it was necessary to remove the child for safety reasons. This issue will be addressed in question B.
|
| B. If, during the period under review, any child was removed from the home without providing or arranging for services, was this action necessary to ensure the child's safety? |
Yes
|
No
|
NA
|
|
Instructions:
- If the answer to question A is Yes, but, after making efforts to provide services, the child(ren) were removed from the home during the period under review due to safety concerns, the answer to question B should be Not Applicable (NA).
- If the child was not removed from the home during the period under review, the answer to question B should be Not Applicable (NA).
- Reviewers should focus on whether the circumstances of the case suggest that services would not have been able to ensure the child's safety if the child remained in the home. If the information indicates that it was necessary to remove the child to ensure the child's safety, the answer to question B should be Yes. If the information indicates that services should have been provided to prevent removal (for example, homemaking or family preservation services) but the child was removed without providing those services, this question should be answered No.
- If services should have been offered to protect the child, but were not because those services were not available in the community, the answer to question B should be No.
|
Rating Criteria:
This item should be rated as a Strength if either of the following applies:
- The answer to question A is Yes, and the answer to question B is Not Applicable.
- The answer to question A is No, but the answer to question B is Yes.
This item should be rated as an Area Needing Improvement if either of the following applies:
- The answer to question A is No, and the answer to question B is No.
- The answer to question A is No, and the answer to question B is Not Applicable.
|
| SAFETY OUTCOME 2: CHILDREN ARE SAFELY MAINTAINED IN THEIR HOMES WHENEVER POSSIBLE AND APPROPRIATE |
| Item 4: Risk assessment and safety management (case file and interviews with caseworker, parent(s), child, foster parent(s), service providers, guardians ad litem) |
| Purpose of Assessment: To determine whether, during the period under review, the agency made concerted efforts to assess and address the risk and safety concerns relating to the child(ren) in their own homes or while in foster care. |
| Applicable Cases: All cases are applicable for an assessment of this item. |
| A. If the case was opened during the period under review, did the agency conduct an initial assessment of the risk to the target child in foster care and/or any child(ren) in the family remaining in the home? |
Yes
|
No
|
NA
|
|
| B. During the period under review, did the agency conduct ongoing assessments of the risk to the target child in foster care and/or any child(ren) in the family remaining in the home? |
Yes
|
No
|
NA
|
|
Definitions:
- "Risk" is defined as the likelihood that a child will be maltreated in the future.
- "Target child" is defined as the child in a foster care case who is the subject of the case.
Instructions:
- Questions A and B should be answered for the target child in foster care or receiving in-home services and any other children in the family remaining in the home.
- Question A should be answered Not Applicable (NA) if the case was opened before the period under review.
- Reviewers should note that in some cases, the issue of ongoing risk assessments may not be relevant because the case was opened near the end of the period under review and was not closed during the period under review (for example, if the case was opened shortly before the end of the period under review and during the initial assessment the agency determined that there were no risk concerns, then it may be reasonable to conclude that the agency would not have conducted a second risk assessment during the period under review). In this case, reviewers should determine whether the agency conducted ongoing risk assessments and, if not, whether it should have given the timeframe of the case. If reviewers believe that ongoing risk assessments were not necessary, question B may be answered Not Applicable (NA).
- In responding to question B, reviewers should determine whether ongoing risk assessments (formal or informal) were conducted during the period under review. If the agency conducted a risk assessment at the onset of the case, but did not assess for risk on an ongoing basis (for example, when there were new allegations of abuse or neglect, changing family conditions, changes to visitation, upon reunification, or at case closure, etc.) then the answer to question B should be No unless the reviewers have sufficient information, based on their review of the case, to determine that during the period under review there were no apparent risk concerns for the child in foster care or any child(ren) in the family who remained in the home.
- If a case was closed during the period under review, reviewers should determine whether the agency conducted a risk assessment before closing the case. If not, the answer to question B should be No, unless the reviewers have sufficient information, based on their review of the case, to determine that such an assessment was not necessary because during the period under review there were no apparent risk concerns for the child in foster care or any child(ren) in the family remaining in the home.
|
| C. If the case was opened during the period under review for either foster care or in-home services, did the agency: (1) conduct an initial assessment of the safety of the target child in foster care and/or any child(ren) remaining in the home, and (2) develop a safety plan with the family for addressing identified safety issues? |
Yes
|
No
|
NA
|
|
| D. During the period under review, did the agency: (1) conduct ongoing safety assessments of the target child in foster care and/or any child(ren) remaining in the home, and (2) continually monitor and update the safety plan, including encouraging family engagement in services designed to promote achievement of the goals of the safety plan? |
Yes
|
No
|
NA
|
|
Definitions:
- "Safety assessment" refers to the determination of whether a child is in a safe environment. A safe environment is one in which there are no threats that pose a danger or, if there are threats, there is a responsible adult in a caregiving role who demonstrates sufficient capacity to protect the child.
- "Safety plan" refers to a plan that describes strategies developed by the agency and family to ensure that the child(ren) is safe. Safety plans should address safety threats and how those will be managed/addressed by the caregiver, caregiver capacity to implement the plan and report safety issues to the agency, and family involvement in implementation of the plan. Safety plans may be separate from or integrated into the case plan.
Instructions:
- Questions C and D should be answered for the target child in foster care or receiving in-home services and any other child(ren) in the family remaining in the home.
- Question C should be answered Not Applicable (NA) if the case was opened before the period under review.
- Question D should be answered Not Applicable (NA) if the reviewers determine that during the period under review there were no apparent safety concerns for the target child in foster care and/or any child(ren) in the family remaining in the home.
- Reviewers should note that in some cases, the issue of ongoing safety assessments may not be relevant because the case was opened near the end of the period under review and was not closed during the period under review (for example, if the case was opened shortly before the end of the period under review and during the initial assessment the agency determined that there were no safety concerns, then it may be reasonable to conclude that the agency would not have conducted a second safety assessment during the period under review). In this case, reviewers should determine whether the agency conducted ongoing safety assessments and, if not, whether the assessments should have been conducted given the timeframe of the case. If reviewers believe that ongoing safety assessments were not necessary, question D may be answered Not Applicable (NA).
- In responding to questions C and D, reviewers should determine whether the agency conducted initial and ongoing safety assessments (formal or informal) during the period under review.
- If the agency did not assess the child(ren)'s safety on an ongoing basis (for example, when there were new allegations of abuse or neglect, changing family conditions, changes to visitation, upon reunification, or at case closure, etc.) then the answer to question D should be No unless the reviewer determines that during the period under review there were no apparent safety concerns for any child(ren) in the family remaining in the home.
- If the case was closed during the period under review, reviewers should determine whether a safety assessment was conducted before closing the case. If not, the answer to question D should be No, unless the reviewer has sufficient information, based on review of the case, to determine that such an assessment was not necessary because during the period under review there were no apparent safety concerns for any child(ren) in the family remaining in the home.
|
| E. During the period under review, were there safety concerns pertaining to the target child in foster care or any child(ren) in the family remaining in the home that were not adequately or appropriately addressed by the agency? |
Yes
|
No
|
NA
|
|
Instructions:
- In answering question E, reviewers should consider whether any of the following occurred while the case was open for services (select all that are appropriate and provide further information in the documentation section):
- There were maltreatment allegations on the family that were reported to the agency but were inappropriately screened out (based on reviewers' judgments).
- There were maltreatment allegations on the family but they were never formally reported or formally investigated.
- There were extensive delays in accepting an allegation for investigation or assessment.
- There were maltreatment allegations that were not substantiated despite evidence that would support a substantiation.
- The case was closed prematurely (based on reviewers' judgments and because of either an agency or court decision).
- Question E should be answered Not Applicable (NA) if the reviewer determines that during the period under review there were no apparent safety concerns for the target child in foster care and/or any child(ren) in the family remaining in the home.
|
| F. During the period under review, was there a safety concern related to the target child in foster care during visitation by parents or other family members that could be attributed to not providing sufficient monitoring of visitation, permitting unsupervised visitation when it was not appropriate, or court-ordered visitation against agency recommendations? |
Yes
|
No
|
NA
|
|
Instructions:
- The answer to question F should be Not Applicable (NA) if this is not a foster care case.
- If the child does not have visits with the parents or with other family members (for example, parental rights have been terminated and the parents are no longer involved in the child's life, or parents are incarcerated and there are no visits with family members), the answer to question F should be Not Applicable (NA).
- Reviewers should determine whether the visitation arrangements with parents or other family members with regard to supervised or unsupervised visits or home visits were appropriate given the circumstances of the case.
- If a reviewer determines that unsupervised visitation is permitted, but that this type of visitation presents safety concerns for the child, then the answer to question F should be Yes.
- Reviewers should assess whether any safety concerns existed during the child's visitation with parents. For example, were there allegations of child maltreatment during visitation or was the child in an unsafe situation during visitation (for example, because the custodial parent's significant other, who was known to be a drug user, was present in the home or because previously identified risk factors had not been mitigated through effective treatment)?
|
| G. During the period under review, was there a concern for the target child's safety related to the foster parents, members of the foster parents' family, other children in the foster home or facility, or facility staff members that was not adequately or appropriately addressed by the agency? (Foster parents include pre-adoptive parents and nonlicensed relatives providing care to a child in State custody.) |
Yes
|
No
|
NA
|
|
Instructions:
- The answer to question G should be Not Applicable (NA) if this is not a foster care case.
- The answer to question G should be Yes if reviewers determine that, during the period under review, the child was in at least one foster care placement in which he or she was unsafe, and appropriate action was not taken (such as providing closer monitoring of the placement, placing fewer children in the home, providing services to address potential problems or existing problems, finding a more appropriate placement, etc.). The following are examples:
- There was a substantiated allegation of maltreatment of the child by a foster parent (including a relative foster parent) or facility staff member that could have been prevented if the agency had taken appropriate actions.
- There was a critical incident report or other major issue relevant to noncompliance by foster parents or facility staff that could potentially make the child unsafe, and the agency could have prevented it or did not provide an adequate response after it occurred.
- The child's placement during the period under review presented other risks to the child that are not being addressed, even though no allegation was made and no critical incident reports were filed.
- The reviewers discover that there are safety concerns related to the child in the foster home that the agency is unaware of because of inadequate monitoring.
|
| H. During the period under review, if the target child was discharged from foster care to be reunited with parents or relatives or returned home on a trial home visit, did the agency conduct a thorough safety assessment? |
Yes
|
No
|
NA
|
|
Instructions:
- The answer to question H should be Not Applicable (NA) if, during the period under review, the child was not discharged from foster care to reunification with parents or relatives or was not returned home on a trial visit at any time.
- The answer to question H should be Yes if the child was reunified with parents or relatives on a permanent or trial basis, and a thorough safety assessment was conducted before reunification.
- If a thorough safety assessment was not conducted before reunification or a trial home visit, the answer to question H should be No.
|
Rating Criteria:
Item 4 should be rated as a Strength if both of the following apply:
- The answers to questions A, B, C, D, and H are either Yes or Not Applicable, and
- The answers to questions E, F, and G are either No or Not Applicable.
Item 4 should be rated as an Area Needing Improvement if either of the following applies:
- The answer to any one of questions A, B, C, D, or H is No, or
- The answer to any one of questions E, F, or G is Yes.
|
| Rating for this indicator (select one): |
|
Strength |
|
Area Needing Improvement |
Reason for Rating and Documentation
Please provide below your main reason for rating this item as a Strength or an Area Needing Improvement and provide documentation for the identified issues. If any issue is Not Applicable to the case, enter NA in the appropriate space. For each issue, indicate the source of your information (for example, case file, interview with biological mother, interview with caseworker, etc.).
Main Reason
Item 4 is rated as ________________________________________ because:
Documentation Information
If not explained in the "reason for rating" section, describe the circumstances of the case that indicate risk concerns related to the child(ren):
Describe the characteristics of the risk assessment(s) (for example, was one conducted, how was it conducted, how comprehensive was it, what did it include or not include?), including the timing of the risk assessments (for example, at first contact, at the conclusion of the investigation, at case transfer, on an ongoing basis, when new allegations of abuse or neglect were received, when determining changes to visitation, at reunification, or before case closure):
If not explained in the "reasons for rating" section, describe the circumstances of the case that indicate safety concerns related to the child(ren):
Describe the characteristics of the safety assessment(s) (for example, was one conducted, how was it conducted, how comprehensive was it, what did it include or not include?), including the timing of the safety assessments (for example, at first contact, at the conclusion of the investigation, at case transfer, on an ongoing basis, when new allegations of abuse or neglect were received, when determining changes to visitation, at reunification, or before case closure):
Identify the activities undertaken to monitor participation in safety-related services (or the absence of activities to monitor service participation):
Describe the nature of the safety concerns related to the child(ren) during visitation (if relevant), including a description of the visitation (for example, was it unsupervised, and if so, was this appropriate?):
Describe the nature of the safety concerns related to the child(ren) from foster care providers (if relevant) and the agency activities with regard to addressing safety. (For example, was there sufficient monitoring of the placement? Was there an excessive number of children in the foster home? Did the agency respond to the foster parent's request for services to address problems? Is there sufficient monitoring of residential facilities? Are there people living in the home of whom the agency is unaware?):
Was there a report substantiating that the foster care provider(s) maltreated the child during the period under review? If Yes, describe the circumstances of that report, whether the agency might have prevented the maltreatment, and the agency's response:
Other Issues:
|
| SECTION II: PERMANENCY |
| PERMANENCY OUTCOME 1: CHILDREN HAVE PERMANENCY AND STABILITY IN THEIR LIVING SITUATIONS. |
| Item 5: Foster care re-entries (case files, court orders, interview with caseworker) |
| Purpose of Assessment: To assess whether children who entered foster care during the period under review were re-entering within 12 months of a prior foster care episode. |
Applicable Cases: A case is applicable for an assessment of this item if the child entered foster care at least once during the period under review.
Special Circumstances: If a child was on a trial home visit and then returned to a substitute care setting, that return is not considered an "entry into foster care" and the case is not applicable, unless the child was on a trial home visit for more than 6 months and there is no court order extending the trial home visit beyond 6 months.
|
| Is this case applicable? (Select the appropriate response. If the response is No, rate the item as Not Applicable in the rating section, provide your reason for this rating in the documentation section, and continue to item 6.) |
| Yes |
|
|
| No |
|
|
| A. Did any of the child's foster care entries during the period under review occur within 12 months of the child's discharge from a prior foster care episode? |
| Yes |
|
|
| No |
|
|
Definitions:
- "Entry into foster care" refers to a child's removal from his or her normal place of residence and placement in a substitute care setting under the care and placement responsibility of the State or local title IV-E/IV-B agency. Children are considered to have entered foster care if the child has been in substitute care for 24 hours or more.
- "Episode of foster care" refers to the timeframe between a child's entry into foster care (the date shown in Section J on the Face Sheet) and the child's discharge from foster care (the date shown in Section K on the Face Sheet).
- "Discharge" refers to the point when the child is no longer in foster care under the care and responsibility or supervision of the agency. If the agency retains supervision of a child and the child returns home on a trial basis for an unspecified period of time, the child should be considered discharged from foster care after a 6-month period of time, unless a longer period of time has been specified in a court order.
Instructions:
- Reviewers are to answer this question based only on formal entries into and exits from foster care as defined above. Reviewers are not to consider physical reunification as a discharge from foster care unless there also is a transfer of care and placement responsibility.
|
| B. If the answer to question A is Yes, was there evidence that concerted efforts were made to prevent re-entry? |
Yes
|
No
|
NA
|
|
Instructions:
- If the answer to question A is No, the answer to question B should be Not Applicable (NA).
- Reviewers should examine the reasons why a child had multiple entries into foster care and what efforts were made to prevent the re-entry.
|
Rating Criteria:
Item 5 should be rated as a Strength if either of the following applies:
- The answer to question A is No.
- The answer to question A is Yes, and the answer to question B is Yes.
Item 5 should be rated as an Area Needing Improvement if both of the following apply:
- The answer to question A is Yes.
- The answer to question B is No.
|
| PERMANENCY OUTCOME 1: CHILDREN HAVE PERMANENCY AND STABILITY IN THEIR LIVING SITUATIONS. |
| Item 6: Stability of foster care placement (case files and interviews with caseworker, foster parent(s), child) |
| Purpose of Assessment: To determine if the child in foster care is in a stable placement at the time of the onsite review and that any changes in placement that occurred during the period under review were in the best interest of the child and consistent with achieving the child's permanency goal(s). |
| Applicable Cases: All foster care cases are applicable for an assessment of this item. |
| Is this case applicable? (Select the appropriate response. If the response is No, rate the item as Not Applicable in the rating section, provide your reason for this rating in the documentation section, and continue to item 7.) |
| Yes |
|
|
| No |
|
|
| |
Number |
| A. How many placement settings did the child experience during the period under review? |
|
Definitions:
- "Placement setting" refers to a physical setting in which a child resides while in foster care under the care and placement of the agency. A new placement setting would result, for example, when a child moves from one foster family home to another or to a group home or institution. Placement settings may include shelter care, treatment facilities, and juvenile justice placements. If, however, a foster family with whom a child is placed moves and the child moves with them, this does not constitute a change in placement.
- "Entry into foster care" refers to a child's removal from his or her normal place of residence and placement in a substitute care setting under the care and placement responsibility of the State or local title IV-E/IV-B agency. Children are considered to have entered foster care if the child has been in substitute care for 24 hours or more.
- "Current episode of foster care" refers to a child's current stay in foster care based on the most recent removal of the child from his or her normal place of residence, resulting in his or her placement in a foster care setting and ending upon the child's discharge from foster care.
Instructions:
- If there were multiple episodes of foster care during the period under review, add up the placement settings within each episode. If there is a re-entry into foster care and the child is placed in a different placement setting at the time of re-entry, then it would count as a new placement setting. If the child returns to the placement setting that he or she was in before the return home, then it would not count as a new placement setting.
- Reviewers should not consider the following as placement settings: (1) a trial home visit; (2) a runaway episode; (3) temporary absences from the child's ongoing foster care placement, including visitation with a sibling, relative, or other caretaker (for example, pre-placement visits with a subsequent foster care provider or pre-adoptive parents); (4) hospitalization for medical treatment, acute psychiatric episodes, or diagnosis; (5) respite care; and (6) day or summer camps.
- Complete the table below. Begin with the child's placement setting at the onset of the period under review, or if the child entered foster care during the period under review, begin with the first placement setting at entry into foster care. If there was only one placement setting, complete only the first two columns of the first row.
|
| Placement Date |
Placement Type |
Reason for Change in Placement Setting |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| B. If the response to question A is greater than one (1), were all placement changes during the period under review planned by the agency in an effort to achieve the child's case goals or to meet the needs of the child? |
| Yes |
|
|
| No |
|
|
| NA |
|
|
Definitions:
- Placement changes that reflect agency efforts to achieve case goals include moves from a foster home to an adoptive home, moves from a more restrictive to a less restrictive placement, moves from non-relative foster care to relative foster care, moves that bring the child closer to family or community, etc.
- Placement changes that do not reflect agency efforts to achieve case goals include moves due to unexpected and undesired placement disruptions; moves due to placing the child in an inappropriate placement (that is, one that was based on availability rather than on appropriateness); moves to more restrictive placements when this is not essential to achieving a child's permanency goal; temporary placements while awaiting a more appropriate placement; and practices of routinely placing children in a particular placement type, such as shelter care, upon initial entry into foster care regardless of individual needs.
Instructions:
- If the response to question A is one (1), then the response to question B should be Not Applicable (NA). If the single placement is not stable, that information will be collected in question C.
- If ALL placement changes during the period under review reflect planned agency efforts to achieve the child's case goals or meet the needs of the child, then the answer to question B should be Yes.
- If any single placement change that occurred during the period under review was for a reason other than agency efforts to achieve case goals or to meet the child's needs, the answer to question B should be No.
- Placement changes that occur as a result of unexpected circumstances that are out of the control of the agency (such as the death of a foster parent or foster parents moving to another State) can be considered similar to those that reflect agency efforts to achieve case goals for purposes of question B.
|
| C. Is the child's current placement setting (or most recent placement if the child is no longer in foster care) stable? |
| Yes |
|
|
| No |
|
|
Instructions:
If any of the following apply to the child's current placement, the answer to question C should be No (select all that apply). If none of the following applies, then the answer to question C should be Yes.
- The child's current placement is in a temporary shelter or other temporary setting.
- There is information indicating that the child's current substitute care provider may not be able to continue to care for the child.
- There are problems in the current placement that threaten the stability of the placement but that the agency is not addressing.
- The child has run away from this placement more than once in the past, or is in runaway status at the time of the review.
- Other (describe):
|
Rating Criteria:
Item 6 should be rated as a Strength if either of the following applies:
- The answer to question A is one (1), the answer to question B is Not Applicable, and the answer to question C is Yes.
- The answer to question A is greater than one (1), but the answers to questions B and C are Yes.
Item 6 should be rated as an Area Needing Improvement if either of the following applies:
- The answer to question A is one (1), but the answer to question C is No.
- The answer to question A is greater than one (1), and the answer to either question B or C is No.
|
| PERMANENCY OUTCOME 1: CHILDREN HAVE PERMANENCY AND STABILITY IN THEIR LIVING SITUATIONS. |
| Item 7: Permanency goal for child (case file and interviews with caseworker and other relevant persons involved in the case, including the child, when age appropriate, parent(s), foster parent(s), service providers, CASA workers, guardian ad litem) |
| Purpose of Assessment: To determine whether appropriate permanency goals were established for the child in a timely manner. |
| Applicable Cases: All foster care cases are applicable for assessment of this item, unless the case has not been open long enough (less than 60 days) for the agency to have developed a case plan and established a permanency goal. If the case has been open for less than 60 days, but a permanency goal has been established, the case is applicable for assessment. |
| Is this case applicable? (Select the appropriate response. If the response is No, rate the item as Not Applicable in the rating section, provide your reason for this rating in the documentation section, and continue to item 8.) |
| Yes |
|
|
| No |
|
|
| |
Permanency Goal 1 |
Permanency Goal 2 (if applicable) |
| A1. What is (are) the child's current permanency goal(s) (or if the case was closed during the period under review, what was the permanency goal before the case was closed)? |
|
|
Instructions:
- Permanency goals are the following: adoption, guardianship, reunification with parents, reunification with relatives, and other planned permanent living arrangements. A goal of other planned permanent living arrangement often will not be specified in the case file using that term. This goal refers to a situation in which the State maintains care and custody responsibilities for the child, but places the child in a setting in which the child is expected to remain until adulthood, such as with foster parents who have made a commitment to care for the child permanently, with relatives who have made the same commitment, or with a residential care facility (for example, for children with developmental disabilities who require residential care).
- The permanency goal or goals identified in question A1 determine the additional items to be completed for this outcome (items 8, 9, or 10). If two concurrent permanency goals have been established and are identified in the case plan, identify both goals and complete the corresponding items (items 8, 9, or 10) for each of the goals. If both goals fall under item 8, complete item 8 with both goals in mind. Do not report concurrent goals in A1 unless both are identified in the case file.
|
| A2. Is (are) the child's permanency goal(s) specified in the case file? |
| Yes |
|
|
| No |
|
|
Instructions:
- Permanency goals should be established in the case file. If the permanency goal is not specified anywhere in the case file, such as in the case plan or in a court order, then the answer to question A2 should be No, and item 7 should be rated as an Area Needing Improvement.
- If no permanency goal is specified in the case file, reviewers should ask the caseworker to identify the permanency goal toward which the agency is working for the child. This goal should be entered for question A1, and should be used to determine which additional item is completed for the case. Reviewers should ask the caseworker to explain why the child's permanency goal is not specified in the case file and include that information in the documentation section.
|
| B. Were all permanency goals in effect during the period under review established in a timely manner? |
| Yes |
|
|
| No |
|
|
Instructions:
- Reviewers should answer this question based on their professional judgment regarding the timeliness of establishing the goal, particularly with regard to changing a goal, and provide the rationale for their decision in the documentation section. For children who recently entered care, reviewers should expect the first permanency goal to be established no later than 60 days from the date of the child's entry into foster care consistent with the Federal requirement that a case plan be established within 60 days from the date of the child's entry into foster care. For children whose goal was changed from reunification to adoption, reviewers should consider the guidelines established by the Federal Adoption and Safe Families Act (ASFA) regarding seeking termination of parental rights, which might impact the timeliness of changing a goal from reunification to adoption.
- Reviewers should answer this question for all permanency goals in effect during the period under review. If there are concurrent goals, the answer should apply to both goals. For example, if there are concurrent goals of reunification and adoption, and you believe that the reunification goal was established in a timely manner, but the adoption goal was not, the answer to question B should be No.
- Complete the table below for each of the goals in place during the period under review. Begin with the child's first permanency goal in place during the period under review, and end with the current or latest permanency goal or goals identified in section A.
|
| Permanency Goal |
Date Established |
Time in Foster Care Before Goal Established |
Date Goal Changed |
Reason for Goal Change |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| C. Were all permanency goals in effect during the period under review appropriate to the child's needs for permanency and to the circumstances of the case? |
| Yes |
|
|
| No |
|
|
Instructions:
- Reviewers should answer this question based on their professional judgment regarding the appropriateness of the permanency goal and provide the rationale for their decision in the documentation section.
- Reviewers should consider the factors that the agency considered in deciding on the permanency goal and whether all of the relevant factors were evaluated.
- If one of the goals is other planned permanent living arrangement and the reviewer determines that the goal was established without a thorough consideration of other permanency goals, then the answer to question C should be No.
|
| D. Has the child been in foster care for at least 15 of the most recent 22 months? |
| Yes |
|
|
| No |
|
|
Instruction:
- In answering question D, reviewers should begin the "count" with the date of the judicial finding of child abuse and neglect (usually the adjudicatory hearing) or 60 days after the child's removal from the home and placement in a substitute care setting, whichever is earlier.
|
| E. If the answer to question D is No, does the child meet other Adoption and Safe Families Act (ASFA) criteria for termination of parental rights (TPR)? |
| Yes |
|
|
| No |
|
|
| NA |
|
|
| Definit |
|
Print
