Skip ACF banner and navigation
Department of Health and Human Services logo
Questions?  
Privacy  
Site Index  
Contact Us  
   Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News Search  
Administration for Children and Families US Department of Health and Human Services

Children's Bureau Safety, Permanency, Well-being  Advanced
 Search

Table 1 illustrates how the incentive works.

Adoptions Finalized and Incentive Bonuses Paid for State XYZ for FYs 1998 Through 2002

STATE XYZ 1995 1996 1997 AVG 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
1. Established Baseline - - - - 100 150 150 160 190
2. Established Special Needs Baseline - - - - 50 75 90 100 115
3. Total Number of Adoptions 78 106 117 100 150 148 160 190 238
4. Number of Special Needs Adoptions 34 56 59 50 75 90 100 115 160
5. Bonus Payment
[(L3-LI)x$4,000]
- - - - $200,000 ** $40,000 $120,000 $192,000
6. Special Needs Bonus Payment*
[(L4-L2)x$2,000]
- - - - $50,000 ** $20,000 $30,000 $90,000
7. Total Bonus
[Line5+Line6]
- - - - $250,000 ** $60,000 $150,00 $282,000

* Special needs bonus payments are made only if Line 3 exceeds Line 1, and Line 4 exceeds Line 2.
** No bonus payments are made because the total number of adoptions for fiscal year 1999 did not exceed the baseline for the year.

Please note the following situations reflected in the table:

  1. Each year's awards are considered on their own.

  2. Incentives are not paid out until the year after they have been earned.

  3. In this example, the baselines for the 1998 incentives are 100 and 50. Because the 1997 achievements were 117 and 59, however, no year's established baselines (other than 1998) could fall below 117 and 59 for the purposes of earning the incentive funds.

The following table indicates how the baselines and incremental targets for adoption and guardianship may be structured:

1997 Baseline Data:
117 Adoptions
30 Guardianships
147 Permanent Placements

Goals for 2002:
234 Adoptions
60 Guardianships
294 Permanent Placements

Attachment 2 - Table 2: Illustrates how a State may set its incremental targets