![]() |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
||||
| ACF Home | Services | Working with ACF | Policy/Planning | About ACF | ACF News | HHS Home | |||||
Questions?
|
Privacy
|
Site Index
|
Contact Us
|
Download Reader
|
|---|
The role of the child protective services (CPS) agency is to respond to the needs of children who are alleged to have been maltreated and to ensure that they remain safe. In 2000, almost three million children were the subjects of a CPS investigation or assessment1. Approximately 30 percent were found to have experienced or to have been at risk of experiencing abuse or neglect. These children are considered victims of child maltreatment.
In this chapter, the numbers and characteristics of these victims are analyzed. Rates of victims per 1,000 children in the population and 5-year trends on key variables are also presented. In addition, supplementary analyses based on case-level data are presented on maltreatment types by age and sex of victims and on maltreatment recurrence.
An estimated 879,000 children were victims of abuse and neglect in 2000. This national estimate is based on data from 50 States.2 In these States, 12.2 children for every 1,000 children in the population were victims of abuse or neglect. A child was counted each time he or she was found to be a victim of maltreatment (figure 3-1).3
The 2000 victimization rate has shown a small, 1-year increase to 12.2 per 1,000 children, but it is still the second-lowest level in the past decade. This increase may be due to various factors including a more timely completion of investigations, a cleared backlog of investigations awaiting dispositions, or a reduced rate in 1999 of 11.8 per 1,000 children due to census population estimates. It is not possible to tell whether this year's slight increase indicates a trend until more data are collected (figure 3-2).
Return to Table of Contents
In 2000, 62.8 percent of victims suffered neglect (including medical neglect); 19.3 percent were physically abused; 10.1 percent were sexually abused; and 7.7 percent were emotionally or psychologically maltreated. In addition, 16.6 percent of victims were associated with "Other" type of maltreatment, which was not coded as one of the main types of maltreatment. For example, some States included "abandonment," "threats of harm to the child," and "congenital drug addiction" as "Other." The percentages total more than 100 percent of victims because children may have been victims of more than one type of maltreatment.4
Figure 3-3 illustrates that in 2000, neglect, which had the highest reported incidence, had a rate of 7.3 victims per 1,000 children, and that psychological maltreatment had a rate of 1.0 victims per 1,000 children.
The rates of victimization by type of maltreatment have fluctuated slightly from year to year. Five-year trends of the rates of physical abuse and sexual abuse per 1,000 children in the population show a decrease. Five-year trends of the rates of medical neglect and psychological or emotional abuse per 1,000 children in the population depict stable rates. For the same timeframe, the rate of neglect per 1,000 children in the population had shown a decrease from 7.6 in 1996 to 6.5 in 1999. Then in 2000, there was an upturn to a rate of 7.3.
Return to Table of Contents
In 2000, 48.1 percent of victims were male, and 51.9 percent of the victims were female. The male victimization rate was 11.2 male children per 1,000 in the population compared to a rate of 12.8 female children per 1,000 in the population.5
Children in the age group of birth to 3 years had the highest victimization rate (figure 3-4). Overall, the rate of victimization is inversely related to the age of the child. The victimization rates ranged from 15.7 children per 1,000 children aged birth to 3, to 5.7 children per 1,000 aged 16-17.6 In terms of 5-year trends, the percentage of victims by age group has remained relatively stable.7
Return to Table of Contents
Case-level data can be used to examine patterns of maltreatment by the age and the sex of victims. In general, younger children had higher rates of victimization across maltreatment categories, except for victims of sexual abuse.8
Male and female victims had similar rates of victimization for all types of maltreatment, except sexual abuse. For example, rates of physical abuse, neglect, and medical neglect were nearly identical for children of both sexes. However, the female sexual abuse rate was higher than the male sexual abuse rate (1.7 victims per 1,000 female children compared to 0.4 victims per 1,000 male children).
Other findings, by age group, are listed below:
Return to Table of Contents
More than half of all victims were White (50.6%); a quarter (24.7%) were African American; and a sixth (14.2%) were Hispanic. American Indian/Alaska Natives accounted for 1.6 percent of victims, and Asian-Pacific Islanders accounted for 1.4 percent of victims.9
Return to Table of Contents
For most children who experience maltreatment recurrence, the efforts of the CPS system have not been successful in preventing the subsequent victimization. However, recurrence may also be influenced by an increased exposure to reporting sources, including service providers. Thus, analyses of short-term recurrence, as in this report, reflect observed recurrence and should be supplemented by analyses of recurrence across longer periods.
Recurrence within 6 months of the initial substantiated or indicated maltreatment occurred with 8.6 percent of abuse or neglect victims.10 Ten States-Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Texas-had a recurrence rate equal to or less than 6.1 percent, which is the national child safety standard used in evaluating State outcome performance by the Child and Family Services Reviews (CFSR).11
Fifteen States provided sufficient data to support an analysis of the factors that influence the likelihood of recurrence.12 In this analysis, recurrence is defined as a second substantiated or indicated maltreatment occurring within a 6-month period. The major results of the analysis are summarized below:
The regression analysis results support a general conclusion that younger children, those neglected or who experience multiple maltreatment forms, those with female parent perpetrators, and those who have been reported before are the most vulnerable to continued maltreatment. Children and their families who have received services, including placement, and those reported by nonprofessionals and educators are more likely to experience recurrence. These findings are consistent with those reported in the analysis of recurrence for the 1999 data, the first year this analysis was prepared. This year, the influence of the relationship of the perpetrator has also been analyzed.13
Return to Table of Contents
The following pages contain the tables referenced in Chapter 3. Unless otherwise explained, a blank indicates that the State did not submit useable data and a number in bold indicates either a total or an estimate.
Chapter Three: Figures and Tables
Notes
1 Supporting data
are provided in supplementary table 3-1,
which is located at the end of this chapter. Back
2 See supplementary
table 3-2. Back
3 See
supplementary table 3-3. Back
4 See supplementary
table 3-4. Back
5 See supplementary
table 3-6. Back
6 See supplementary
table 3-7. For information about victims
by single-year age groups, see supplementary table 3-8. Back
7 See
supplementary table 3-9. Back
8 Rates by type
of maltreatment and age and sex of victims will vary slightly from
the rates of victimization because a child can be the victim of
more than one type of maltreatment. See supplementary table 3-10. Back
9 See supplementary
table 3-11. Back
10 See supplementary
table 3-12. Back
11 The CFSR was
mandated by the Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997 (P.L.
105-89). The national standards were defined in an Information
Memorandum issued by the Administration for Children and Families
on August 16, 2001. Back
12 See
supplementary table 3-13. Back
13 The
inclusion of perpetrator data reduced the number of States that
could be included in the analyses due to the lack of either
perpetrator data or perpetrator relationship data. Criteria used
for excluding data from some States are discussed on the first page
of Chapter 4, Perpetrators. Back
Return to Table of Contents