![]() |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
||||
| ACF Home | Services | Working with ACF | Policy/Planning | About ACF | ACF News | HHS Home | |||||
Questions?
|
Privacy
|
Site Index
|
Contact Us
|
Download Reader
|
|---|
Child abuse and neglect is one of the Nation's most serious concerns. The Children's Bureau, Administration on Children, Youth, and Families in the Administration for Children and Families in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, addresses this important issue in many ways. One example is to collect data on the children who are served by child protective services (CPS) agencies.
This report, the 16th edition, presents national data about child abuse and neglect known to CPS agencies in the United States during Federal fiscal year (FFY) 2005. The data were collected and analyzed through the National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System (NCANDS) supported by the Children's Bureau. This chapter discusses the background of NCANDS and describes the annual data collection process.
The Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA) was amended in 1988 to direct the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to establish a national data collection and analysis program that would make available State child abuse and neglect reporting information.1 HHS responded by establishing NCANDS as a voluntary national reporting system. In 1992, HHS produced its first NCANDS report based on data from 1990. The Child Maltreatment report series has evolved from that initial report.
During the early years, States provided aggregated data on key indicators of CPS provision. Starting with the 1993 data year, States voluntarily began to submit case-level data. For a number of years, States provided both data sets, but starting with data year 2000, the case-level data set became the primary source of data for the annual report. The aggregated data file, the Summary Data Component (SDC), is almost phased out, as States are increasingly able to provide automated case-level data. For FFY 2005, 49 States reported case-level data.2
In 1996, CAPTA was amended to require all States that receive funds from the Basic State Grant program to work with the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services to provide specific data, to the extent practicable, about children who had been maltreated. The required CAPTA data items are provided in appendix A. An NCANDS glossary of terms is provided as appendix B.
A State Advisory Group, comprising State CPS program administrators and information systems managers, assists with the identification and resolution of issues related to child protective services data. This group suggests strategies for improving the quality of data submitted by the States and reviews proposed modifications to NCANDS. The Children's Bureau convenes the State Advisory Group annually. The 2005 State Advisory Group members are listed below:
| Donnie Wise, Alabama Kristen Tromble, Alaska Victor Simon, California Shirley Vassy, Georgia Lois Branic, District of Columbia Joan Davis, Florida Char Williams, Iowa Walter G. Fahr, Louisiana Robert N. Pronovost, Maine Philip King, Maryland Rosalind Walter, Massachusetts Jean Swanson Broberg, Minnesota |
Meliny Staysa, Missouri Otto Lynn, Nevada Linnette Carlson, New Mexico Lillian S. Denton, New York Tom Pomonis, North Dakota Elizabeth Roberts, Oklahoma Maria Duryea, Oregon Evelyza Crespo, Puerto Rico Karrie Penney, Utah Lynette Isbell, Virginia Michelle Rawlings, Wisconsin |
In addition to an annual meeting of the State Advisory Group, a technical assistance meeting for all States is held each year. This technical assistance meeting serves as a forum for providing guidance to the States for their annual data submissions and discussing data utilization and training needs.
Data collected by NCANDS are a critical source of information for many publications, reports, and activities of the Federal Government and other groups. An annual report on child welfare outcomes includes context and outcome data on safety, based on State submissions to NCANDS.3 NCANDS data have been incorporated into the Child and Family Services Reviews (CFSR), which ensures conformity with State plan requirements in titles IV-B and IV-E of the Social Security Act. NCANDS data are the basis for two of the new CFSR national data indicators:
The NCANDS data also are used in the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART), which is "a systematic method of assessing the performance of program activities across the Federal government." 4 Children's Bureau programs funded under the CAPTA Basic State Grant and the Community-Based Child Abuse Prevention (CBCAP) State Grants use data from NCANDS as a component of their PART assessments. The measures listed below are included.
The Children's Bureau is working with the Office of Management and Budget for developing additional performance measures.
States that submit case-level data construct a child-specific record for each report of alleged child abuse or neglect that received a disposition as a result of an investigation or an assessment during the reporting period. The reporting period for Child Maltreatment 2005 was October 1, 2004 through September 30, 2005.
Upon receipt of data from each State, a technical validation review was conducted to assess the internal consistency of the data and to identify probable causes for missing data. In many instances, the review concluded that corrections were necessary and the States were requested to resubmit their data. Once a State's case-level data were finalized, aggregate counts were computed and shared with the State. In addition, the aggregate-level data provided in the Agency File are subjected to various logic and consistency checks. (See appendix C, Data Submissions and Data Elements, for additional information regarding data submissions.)
The population of the States that submitted the Child File accounts for approximately 72 million children or 97 percent of the Nation's child population younger than 18 years (table C-1).5 Trend data in this report are based upon the most recent population estimates and data resubmissions from the States. Data were accepted through September 2006.6
This report contains the additional chapters listed below. Throughout the report, tables with supporting data are located at the end of each chapter:
Commentary for State data and contact information for State representatives are presented in appendix D. The commentary section of this report provides valuable insights into policies and conditions that might affect State data. Additional information about specific State policies or practices can be obtained from the State contact listed in the commentary section. A reader survey is included to solicit advice for future reports (appendix E). Please take a few minutes to complete and return the survey using the instructions at the end of the form.
Return to Table of Contents
Notes
1 42 U.S.C. 5101 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 5116 et seq., Public Law 100-294 passed April 25, 1988. back
2 In this report, "States" includes the District of Columbia and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. back
3 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Child Welfare Outcomes 2003: Annual Report (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2006). back
4 Office of Management and Budget. Guidance for Completing the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART). March 2005. back
5 U.S. Census Bureau file PRC-EST2005-AGESEX_RES: Estimates of the Resident Population by Single-Year of Age and Sex http://www.census.gov/popest/puerto_rico/files/PRC_EST2005_AGESEX_RES.csv (accessed 9/13/06), and U.S. Census Bureau file SC-EST2005-Alldata6: State Characteristics Population Estimates with 6 Race Groups http://www.census.gov/popest/states/asrh/files/SC-EST2005-Alldata6.csv (accessed 8/25/06). Here and throughout this report, the term "child population" refers to all people in the U.S. population younger than 18 years. back
6 Five States—California, Massachusetts, Missouri, Nevada, and North Carolina—also resubmitted prior years' data. Trend data reported in Child Maltreatment 2005 reflect those resubmissions. back
Return to Table of Contents