Skip ACF banner and navigation
Department of Health and Human Services logo
Questions?  
Privacy  
Site Index  
Contact Us  
   Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News Search  
Administration for Children and Families US Department of Health and Human Services

Children's Bureau Safety, Permanency, Well-being  Advanced
 Search

Report to Congress on Adoption and Other Permanency Outcomes for Children in
Foster Care: Focus on Older Children


4. Summary


Overall, this evidence indicates the need for concern as well as a reason for hope. The Federal Child and Family Services Reviews have shown that very few States are currently achieving Federal permanency outcomes, but these reviews also are generating valuable knowledge about the specific challenges that must be addressed in State child welfare systems.

States are being held accountable for implementing promising strategies identified in their Program Improvement Plans. While data show that many children in foster care are still without permanency plans and are remaining in care too long, they also show that increasing numbers of children are achieving permanent outcomes (including adoption) when they exit foster care, and growing proportions of these children are older youth. State agencies and local programs need help to improve these outcomes. Some recent examples of information, guidance, financial support, and incentives for enhancing permanency outcomes include:

To assist States in their efforts to implement innovative and promising practices, the President has proposed a child welfare program option that would provide flexibility in Federal title IV-E foster care funding to States for child welfare services. This option would assist States in developing a continuum of services that promote children's safety, permanency, and well-being. States would have the choice of receiving a fixed allocation of IV-E foster care funds as a flexible grant for a 5-year period or remaining within the current entitlement structure. For States choosing the option, current restrictions on uses of funds would be removed to include services such as subsidized guardianship and other permanency efforts, foster care payments, training, family preservation, and administrative activities. Enactment of this proposal, or a similarly flexible funding structure, will go a long way toward supporting States' efforts to improve permanency outcomes for children in foster care.

Although many challenges to achieving permanency remain, there are many promising strategies being employed across the country to address them. To continue the progress underway, it is imperative that Federal and State governments and foundations continue their support of demonstration programs and initiatives that promote permanency, especially permanency for older children in foster care. At the same time, it is important to synthesize and share the results and lessons learned from these projects so all States can benefit from the knowledge being generated. Some of the most promising strategies from these programs are:

The field is building a collection of promising and evidence-based practices; the next steps are to share this knowledge and provide the necessary supports for replication, evaluation, and sustainability that will keep the field moving in the right direction. All children in foster care, including adolescents, need safe, permanent, loving families. These strategies will help achieve that goal.

 

Return to Table of Contents