Skip ACF banner and navigation
Department of Health and Human Services logo
Questions?  
Privacy  
Site Index  
Contact Us  
   Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News Search  
Administration for Children and Families US Department of Health and Human Services

Children's Bureau Safety, Permanency, Well-being  Advanced
 Search

 

Child Welfare Outcomes 2000: Annual Report
Chapter IV - State Data

Context Data | Outcomes Data | State Comment | Federal Comment
Return to Table of Contents

Michigan [ Context Data ]

A. Key Context Statistics

General Population

1998

1999

2000

Total children under 18 years

2,551,615

2,561,139

2,595,767

Race/ethnicity (%)1

 Alaska Native/American Indian

0.7

0.6

0.6

 Asian/Pacific Islander

1.8

1.9

1.8

 Black

17.1

17.2

17.3

 Hispanic

3.9

4.1

4.8

 White

76.5

76.2

72.4

 Two or more races

N/A

N/A

2.8

 Other

N/A

N/A

0.2

% Child population in poverty

15.3

14.1

13.6

% Child population living in metropolitan areas

87.2

91.3

83.2

 

Child Welfare

1998

1999

2000

Child maltreatment victims

22,744

24,505

26,680

Children in foster care on 9/30

18,583

20,300

20,034

Children adopted

2,257

2,446

2,803

1) The 2000 Census of the United States includes two new race catagories: (1) Persons of two or more races and (2) Other. Back

 

B. Child Maltreatment Data (NCANDS)

 

Number

Rate

Maltreatment Information Overview

1998

1999

2000

1998

1998

2000

Children subject of an investigated report alleging child maltreatment

156,425

166,160

164,369

61.3 per 1,000

64.9 per 1,000

63.3 per 1,000

Child maltreatment victims2

22,744

24,505

26,680

8.9 per 1,000

9.6 per 1,000

10.3 per 1,000

Child fatalities

40

48

-

1.6 per 100,000

1.9 per 100,000

- per 100,000

 

Age of Child Victims (%)

1998

1999

2000

Under 1 year

11.0

11.9

12.4

1-5 years

30.3

28.9

27.9

6-10 years

30.9

31.0

30.6

11-15 years

23.0

23.5

24.0

16+ years

4.8

4.7

5.1

Unknown

-

-

-

Total %

100.0

100.0

100.0

Number

22,744

24,505

26,680

 

Race/Ethnicity of Child Victims (%)

1998

1999

2000

Alaska Native/American Indian

0.5

0.7

0.6

Asian/Pacific Islander

0.5

0.4

-

Black

39.8

40.7

39.7

Hispanic

2.6

2.4

2.2

White

54.7

55.8

53.7

Two or more races

N/A

N/A

-

Other/Unknown

4.4

2.4

3.8

Total %3

102.6

102.4

100.0

Number

22,744

24,505

26,680

 

Maltreatment Type of Child Victims (%)

1998

1999

2000

Emotional abuse

6.0

6.9

7.3

Medical neglect

2.3

2.3

2.7

Neglect

46.3

70.8

68.7

Physical abuse

19.9

20.9

22.7

Sexual abuse

6.8

6.5

5.9

Other

25.3

-

-

Unknown

-

-

-

Total %4

106.6

107.4

107.3

Number

22,744

24,505

26,680

2) Children with more than one report of substantiated or indicated maltreatment may be counted more than once. Back
3) Percentages may total more than 100 percent because Hispanics may be counted both by Hispanic ethnicity and by race. Back
4) Percentages may total more than 100 percent because children could have been victims of more than one type of maltreatment. Back

C. Children in Foster Care
(AFCARS Annual Foster Care Database)

Number of Children

In Care on 10/1

Entered Care

Exited Care

In Care on 9/30

Total Served

FY1998 (10/1/97-9/30/98)

13,570

10,220

5,207

18,583

23,790

FY1999 (10/1/98-9/30/99)

16,111

10,929

6,740

20,300

27,040

FY2000 (10/1/99-9/30/00)

17,129

10,707

7,802

20,034

27,836

Median Length of Stay (Months)

 

 

 

 

 

FY1998 (10/1/97-9/30/98)

13.3

N/A

12.4

13.5

N/A

FY1999 (10/1/98-9/30/99)

13.6

N/A

13.9

14.4

N/A

FY2000 (10/1/99-9/30/00)

14.5

N/A

15.3

14.7

N/A

 

Age of Children in Foster Care (%)

In Care on 10/1/97

In Care on 10/1/98

In Care on 10/1/99

Entered Care During FY 1998

Entered Care During FY 1999

Entered Care During FY 2000

Exited Care During FY 1998

Exited Care During FY 1999

Exited Care During FY 2000

In Care on 9/30/98

In Care on 9/30/99

In Care on 9/30/00

Under 1 year

4.6

4.7

4.5

13.0

12.8

13.9

2.8

2.6

2.7

5.2

5.3

5.2

1-5 years

27.1

26.6

25.2

26.2

24.6

27.0

24.0

24.2

24.8

28.0

26.6

27.3

6-10 years

22.0

23.5

24.4

22.1

22.5

24.4

20.5

20.6

22.5

23.7

25.0

25.2

11-15 years

24.8

24.7

25.5

27.2

26.9

24.5

19.7

19.4

20.0

23.9

24.7

24.9

16-18 years

19.8

18.8

18.3

10.8

11.3

9.5

26.5

26.7

24.7

17.6

16.9

16.0

19+ years

1.3

1.4

1.5

0.1

0.1

0.1

6.0

4.9

4.1

1.3

1.3

1.3

Unknown

0.3

0.3

0.7

0.6

1.7

0.5

0.3

1.6

1.1

0.3

0.3

0.2

Total %

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

Number

13,570

16,111

17,129

10,220

10,929

10,707

5,207

6,740

7,802

18,583

20,300

20,034

 

Race/Ethnicity of Children in Foster Care (%)5

In Care on 10/1/97

In Care on 10/1/98

In Care on 10/1/99

Entered Care During FY 1998

Entered Care During FY 1999

Entered Care During FY 2000

Exited Care During FY 1998

Exited Care During FY 1999

Exited Care During FY 2000

In Care on 9/30/98

In Care on 9/30/99

In Care on 9/30/00

Alaska Native/American Indian

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Asian/Pacific Islander

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Black

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Hispanic

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

White

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Two or more races

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Unknown

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Total %

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Number

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

 

5) In this and subsequent race/ethnicity tables, data for two or more races may be provided for 1998 and 1999 because of States' resubmissions. However, data for 1998 and 1999 may not capture all children of two or more races and therefore may not be comparable to the 2000 data pertaining to two or more races. Back

Back to Top

Return to Table of Contents

D. Children Waiting to Be Adopted
(AFCARS Annual Foster Care Database)6

 

Overview

9/30/98

9/30/99

9/30/00

Children waiting to be adopted

7,665

8,495

7,745

Children whose parents' rights have been terminated (TPR)

4,257

5,166

5,226

 

Age of Waiting Children (%)

1998

1999

2000

Under 1 year

6.7

5.9

5.7

1-5 years

38.9

35.6

33.0

6-10 years

31.5

33.6

31.8

11-15 years

18.7

20.3

23.9

16+ years

3.2

3.4

4.1

Unknown

1.0

1.2

1.5

Total %

100.0

100.0

100.0

Number

7,665

8,495

7,745

 

Race/Ethnicity of Waiting Children (%)

1998

1999

2000

Alaska Native/American Indian

-

-

-

Asian/Pacific Islander

-

-

-

Black

-

-

-

Hispanic

-

-

-

White

-

-

-

Two or more races

-

-

-

Unknown

-

-

-

Total %

-

-

-

Number

-

-

-

6) Waiting children are children who have a goal of adoption and/or whose parentsÂ’ rights have been terminated. Children 16 years and older with TPR, but with a goal of emancipation, have been excluded from the waiting children and TPR populations. Back

E. Children Adopted
(AFCARS Annual Foster Care Database)

 

Age of Adopted Children (%)

1998

1999

2000

Under 1 year

1.3

1.3

1.5

1-5 years

44.9

47.1

43.3

6-10 years

37.8

34.3

36.7

11-15 years

13.8

15.9

15.9

16+ years

2.2

1.6

2.5

Unknown

-

-

-

Total %

100.0

100.0

100.0

Number

2,257

2,446

2,803

 

Race/Ethnicity of Adopted Children (%)

1998

1999

2000

Alaska Native/American Indian

1.4

1.0

0.6

Asian/Pacific Islander

0.3

0.1

0.2

Black

53.0

51.5

49.5

Hispanic

3.2

4.3

4.1

White

41.4

42.4

41.1

Two or more races

-

0.0

-

Unknown

0.7

0.7

0.3

Total %

100.0

100.0

100.0

Number

2,257

2,446

2,803

 

Back to Top

Return to Table of Contents

 

Michigan [ Outcomes Data ]

 

1. Reduce Recurrence of Child Abuse and/or Neglect
(NCANDS)

1.1 Recurrence of Maltreatment Within 6 Months (%)

1998

1999

2000

Children without a recurrence

96.9

96.6

96.7

Children with one or more recurrences

3.1

3.4

3.3

Total %

100.0

100.0

100.0

Number

11,430

11,576

13,482

 

Bar chart describing Percentage of Children With One or More Recurrences of Maltreatment within 6 months data from Table 1.1 above.

 

2. Reduce the Incidence of Child Abuse and/or Neglect in Foster Care
(NCANDS, AFCARS Annual Foster Care Database Jan —Sept)

2.1 Maltreatment in Foster Care (%)

1998

1999

2000

Children maltreated while in foster care

-

-

0.3

Children not maltreated while in foster care

-

-

99.7

Total %

-

-

100.0

Number

-

-

26,044

 

Bar chart describing Percentage of Children Maltreated While in Foster Care data from Table 2.1 above.

 

3. Increase Permanency for Children in Foster Care
(AFCARS Annual Foster Care Database)

3.1 Exits from Foster Care (%)

1998

1999

2000

Adoption

20.1

19.8

21.8

Guardianship

0.7

1.0

1.2

Reunification

58.0

60.0

56.2

Other

21.0

19.1

20.7

Missing data

0.2

0.2

0.2

Total %

100.0

100.0

100.0

Number

5,207

6,740

7,802

 

Pie Charts describing data from Table 3.1 above.

 

3.2 Exits of Disabled Children (%)

1998

1999

2000

Adoption

-

-

-

Guardianship

-

-

-

Reunification

-

-

-

Other

-

-

-

Missing data

-

-

-

Total %

-

-

-

Number

-

-

-

 

3.3 Exits of Children Over Age 12 at Entry (%)

1998

1999

2000

Adoption

2.7

1.6

1.4

Guardianship

0.7

0.8

1.1

Reunification

57.9

60.7

53.6

Other

38.4

36.5

43.4

Missing data

0.3

0.3

0.5

Total %

100.0

100.0

100.0

Number

2,073

2,606

2,812

 

3.4 Exits to Emancipation (%)

1998

1999

2000

Children age 12 or younger at entry

24.4

22.8

23.9

Children older than 12 at entry

74.9

76.5

75.5

Missing data

0.7

0.7

0.5

Total %

100.0

100.0

100.0

Number

426

587

564

 

3.5 Exits by Race/Ethnicity (%)

Alaska Native/A.I.

Asian/P.I.

Black

Hispanic

 

1998

1999

2000

1998

1999

2000

1998

1999

2000

1998

1999

2000

Adoption

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Guardianship

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Reunification

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Other

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Missing data

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Total %

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Number

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

 

White

Unable to Determine

Two or More Races

Missing Data

 

1998

1999

2000

1998

1999

2000

1998

1999

2000

1998

1999

2000

Adoption

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Guardianship

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Reunification

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Other

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Missing data

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Total %

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Number

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

 

Back to Top

Return to Table of Contents

4. Reduce Time to Reunification Without Increasing Re-entry
(AFCARS Annual Foster Care Database)

4.1 Time to Reunification (%)

1998

1999

2000

Less than 12 mos.

53.8

58.1

52.9

At least 12 mos., but less than 24 mos.

27.7

25.0

28.1

At least 24 mos., but less than 36 mos.

8.8

7.7

7.1

At least 36 mos., but less than 48 mos.

3.3

2.4

3.0

48 or more mos.

1.7

1.4

2.2

Missing data

4.7

5.3

6.8

Total (%)

100.0

100.0

100.0

Number

3,018

4,041

4,383

 

Bar chart describing reunification percentages data in Table 4.1 above.

 

4.2 Children Who Entered Foster Care (%)

1998

1999

2000

Children entering care for the first time

89.8

90.3

90.0

Children re-entering care within 12 mos. of a prior episode

4.7

4.9

5.0

Children re-entering care more than 12 mos. after a prior episode

5.0

4.4

4.6

Missing data

0.4

0.4

0.4

Total (%)

100.0

100.0

100.0

Number

10,220

10,929

10,707

 

Bar chart describing re-entries into Foster Care within 12 months from data in Table 4.2 above.

 

5. Reduce Time in Foster Care to Adoption
(AFCARS Annual Foster Care Database)

5.1 Time to Adoption (%)

1998

1999

2000

Less than 12 mos.

48.3

16.7

12.6

At least 12 mos., but less than 24 mos.

20.3

24.2

22.4

At least 24 mos., but less than 36 mos.

13.3

29.2

31.0

At least 36 mos., but less than 48 mos.

9.3

16.4

16.0

48 or more mos.

8.2

13.4

17.8

Missing data

0.7

0.2

0.2

Total (%)

100.0

100.0

100.0

Number

1,048

1,333

1,699

 

Bar Chart describing Percentage of Adoptions Occurring in Less Than 24 or greater than 48 Months of Entry data from Table 5.1 above

 

6. Increase Placement Stability
(AFCARS Annual Foster Care Database)

6.1 Number of Placements by Time in Care (%)

Year

Children With 2 or Fewer Placements

Children With 3 or More Placements

Missing Data

Total %

Number

Less than 12 mos.

1998
1999
2000

85.2
84.9
86.2

14.8
15.1
13.8

-
-
-

100.0
100.0
100.0

10,985
11,750
11,588

At least 12 mos., but <24 mos.

1998
1999
2000

65.8
66.1
65.8

34.2
33.9
34.2

-
-
-

100.0
100.0
100.0

5,758
6,824
6,997

At least 24 mos., but <36 mos.

1998
1999
2000

52.8
56.0
59.4

47.2
44.0
40.6

-
-
-

100.0
100.0
100.0

2,987
3,614
3,863

At least 36 mos., but <48 mos.

1998
1999
2000

44.8
49.0
49.8

55.2
51.0
50.2

-
-
-

100.0
100.0
100.0

1,539
1,914
2,091

48 or more mos.

1998
1999
2000

33.7
36.8
36.5

66.3
63.2
63.5

-
-
-

100.0
100.0
100.0

2,214
2,572
2,865

Missing data

1998
1999
2000

93.5
95.6
97.2

6.5
4.4
2.8

-
-
-

100.0
100.0
100.0

307
366
432

 

 

Bar chart describing foster care placements over time percentages data from Table 6.1 above.

 

7. Reduce Placements of Young Children in Group Homes or Institutions
(AFCARS Annual Foster Care Database)

7.1 Most Recent Placement Settings of Children Who Entered Care During the Fiscal Year and Were Age 12 or Younger at the Time of This Placement (%)

1998

1999

2000

Group homes

0.0

0.1

0.0

Institutions

6.2

5.6

5.7

Other settings

93.8

94.3

94.3

Missing data

-

0.0

0.0

Total (%)

100.0

100.0

100.0

Number

6,929

7,339

7,623

 

Michigan [ State Comment ]

Douglas E. Howard
Michigan Family Independence Agency
517-373-2035

Michigan reported 49 child fatalities in the NCANDS (National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System) Agency File for 2000. We cannot explain why that data did not appear here since HHS has acknowledged receipt of our report, and has included the information in the CFSR (Child and Family Services Review) data profile.

The difference in the child count between September 30, 1999 and October 1, 1999 may be attributed, at least in part, to which episodes are counted in the AFCARS (Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System) data. Our understanding is that many states show this difference and it has not been resolved either at the state or federal level.

Old race data codes could not be reported in the AFCARS format for the period. Beginning in October 2001, Michigan's race coding is AFCARS compliant.

The AFCARS adoption information is accurate. The undercount in foster care exits to adoption is a data definition and data entry problem. Michigan's SACWIS (Statewide Automated Child Welfare Information System), implemented statewide in 2001, will resolve the problem with exits after October 1, 2001.

Prior to implementing SACWIS, Michigan could not accurately report exits of disabled children. This problem will be resolved by SACWIS.

Michigan supports development of comparable welfare data among the states, the evolution of measurable outcomes in child welfare, and use of data to improve child welfare outcomes.

Back to Top

Return to Table of Contents

 

Michigan [ Federal Comment ]

The following discussion focuses on Michigan?s performance with regard to each of the outcomes assessed in the Child Welfare Outcomes Annual Reports to Congress. Information from the State?s Child and Family Services Review (CFSR) Final Report is used to provide a context for interpreting the State?s performance (the Michigan CFSR was conducted in FY 2002). Because data reported in the State Data Pages do not address child well-being issues, the last section of this discussion provides information from the CFSR Final Report relevant to the State?s performance in meeting children?s educational and physical and mental health needs.

Outcome 1. Reduce recurrence of child abuse and/or neglect
In calendar year (CY) 2000, Michigan?s rate of maltreatment recurrence within 6 months was 3.3 percent, which is lower than both the national standard of 6.1 percent and the national median of 7.9 percent. Information from the CFSR Final Report suggests that the State?s effectiveness in preventing maltreatment recurrence may be attributed in part to (1) the active prosecution of offenders, particularly in domestic violence cases; (2) the efforts of contracted service providers who provide services to families while children remain in their homes; and (3) the State?s use of a Structured Decision Making Risk Assessment model with all families.

Outcome 2. Reduce the incidence of child abuse and/or neglect in foster care
In CY 2000, the incidence of maltreatment in foster care was 0.3 percent, which is lower than both the national standard of 0.57 percent and the national median of 0.47 percent. Information from the CFSR Final Report suggests that the low incidence of maltreatment in foster care may be attributed in part to the following: (1) the State?s practice of conducting annual licensing reviews of all child placing agencies and child care institutions, (2) the requirement that child placing agencies must conduct annual reviews of all individual foster homes, and (3) the State?s cap on the ratio of foster care cases at 20 cases per worker to ensure adequate attention to foster care providers as well as children.

Outcome 3. Increase permanency for children in foster care
In fiscal year (FY) 2000, 79.2 percent of children exiting foster care were discharged to permanent homes (which is lower than the national median of 84.7) and 56.1 percent of children exiting foster care who were older than age 12 at entry into foster care were discharged to permanent homes (which is lower than the national median of 72.6). (The State did not provide data pertaining to children with a diagnosed disability.) These findings suggest that the State is not consistently effective in achieving permanency for children, particularly for children who enter foster care when they are older. Information from the CFSR Final Report identifies the following as potential barriers to achieving permanency: (1) a lack of consistent and routine permanency hearings that focus on advancing permanency for children, (2) lack of sufficient attention to meeting the service needs of parents and relatives to promote reunification or permanent placement, and (3) the fact that the State does not have a supported or assisted guardianship program that offers financial assistance (beyond Temporary Assistance to Needy Families) to relatives who wish to assume guardianship of children in their care.

Outcome 4. Reduce time to reunification without increasing re-entry
In FY 2000, the percentage of all reported reunifications occurring within 12 months of children?s entry into foster care was 52.9, which is lower than both the national standard of 76.2 percent and the national median of 68.0 percent. Information from the CFSR Final Report identifies the following as potential barriers to achieving reunifications in a timely manner: (1) inconsistent efforts to provide the services to parents that are necessary to permit reunification, (2) lack of adequate housing in the community, and (3) the fact that parents experience long waiting lists for substance abuse treatment services despite legislation requiring that parents of children in foster care be given priority.

Michigan?s performance with regard to time to reunification must be balanced by the finding that in FY 2000, the percentage of children re-entering foster care within 12 months of discharge from a prior foster care episode was 5.0, which is lower than both the national standard of 8.6 percent and the national median of 10.3 percent. Information from the CFSR Final Report suggests that the State?s effectiveness in preventing re-entries into foster care may be attributed to the caution taken by the courts and by the State child welfare agency in making the decision to return the child home. In addition, when children are returned home, the court and the agency continue to supervise the family to monitor children?s safety.

Outcome 5. Reduce time in foster care to adoption
In FY 2000, the percentage of all finalized adoptions occurring within 24 months of the child?s entry into foster care was 35 percent, which is higher than both the national standard of 32.0 percent and the national median of 19.7 percent. However, the State?s performance with regard to achieving adoptions in a timely manner cannot be assessed because the number of discharges to adoption reported to the Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System (AFCARS) Foster Care Database (1,699) only accounts for 61 percent of the adoptions reported to the AFCARS Adoption Database (2,803). As noted in the State Comment section, the State considers the data reported to the AFCARS Adoption Database as reflecting the correct number of adoptions. Consequently, the percentage of finalized adoptions occurring within 24 months of entry into foster care reported in outcome measure 5.1 cannot be considered accurate.

Outcome 6. Increase placement stability
In FY 2000, the percentage of children who experienced no more than 2 placements during their first 12 months in foster care was 86.2, which is lower than the national standard of 86.7 percent, but greater than the national median of 84.3. According to information provided in the CFSR Final Report, the State believes that problems with placement stability may be attributed to the use of shelter care as an initial placement in some areas of the State and to inadequate support for foster parents to assist them in parenting children with behavioral and/or emotional problems.

Outcome 7. Reduce placements of young children in group homes and institutions
In FY 2000, the percentage of children age 12 or younger placed in a group home or institution was 5.7 percent, which is lower than the national median of 9.0. There is no information in the CFSR Final Report that explains the performance of the State on this outcome measure.

Child well-being outcomes
With respect to child well-being, information in the CSFR Final Report indicates that the State is generally effective in meeting children physical health needs but is less consistently effective in meeting children?s educational and mental health needs. The following were identified in the final report as potential barriers to meeting these needs: (1) a failure in some cases to conduct assessments of children?s educational needs or to link children to services to meet identified needs; (2) a lack of responsiveness of local school systems to agency attempts to advocate for children in foster care; (3) difficulties in accessing mental health services for children, and (4) lack of routine mental health assessments and provision of services to address identified mental health needs.

 

Back to Top

Return to Table of Contents