Context Data | Outcomes Data | State
Comment | Federal Comment
Return to Table of Contents
|
General Population |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
|
Total children under 18 years |
1,331,402 |
1,340,930 |
1,398,521 |
|
Race/ethnicity (%)1 |
|||
|
Alaska Native/American Indian |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
|
Asian/Pacific Islander |
1.2 |
1.2 |
1.0 |
|
Black |
21.4 |
21.4 |
21.1 |
|
Hispanic |
1.6 |
1.7 |
2.8 |
|
White |
75.6 |
75.4 |
73.0 |
|
Two or more races |
N/A |
N/A |
1.6 |
|
Other |
N/A |
N/A |
0.2 |
|
% Child population in poverty |
20.3 |
17.4 |
19.7 |
|
% Child population living in metropolitan areas |
76.2 |
73.4 |
69.0 |
|
Child Welfare |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
|
Child maltreatment victims |
9,930 |
10,611 |
16,572 |
|
Children in foster care on 9/30 |
- |
10,796 |
10,144 |
|
Children adopted |
337 |
382 |
431 |
1) The 2000 Census of the United States includes two new race catagories: (1) Persons of two or more races and (2) Other. Back
|
|
Number |
Rate |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Maltreatment Information Overview |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
1998 |
1998 |
2000 |
|||||
|
Children subject of an investigated report alleging child maltreatment |
32,286 |
33,629 |
51,917 |
24.2 per 1,000 |
25.1 per 1,000 |
37.1 per 1,000 |
|||||
|
Child maltreatment victims2 |
9,930 |
10,611 |
16,572 |
7.5 per 1,000 |
7.9 per 1,000 |
11.8 per 1,000 |
|||||
|
Child fatalities |
12 |
16 |
3 |
0.9 per 100,000 |
1.2 per 100,000 |
0.2 per 100,000 |
|||||
|
Age of Child Victims (%) |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
|
Under 1 year |
9.6 |
9.1 |
9.9 |
|
1-5 years |
31.7 |
30.5 |
30.9 |
|
6-10 years |
31.2 |
31.1 |
29.4 |
|
11-15 years |
22.1 |
23.8 |
24.0 |
|
16+ years |
5.2 |
5.2 |
5.7 |
|
Unknown |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
|
Total % |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Number |
9,930 |
10,611 |
16,572 |
|
Race/Ethnicity of Child Victims (%) |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
|
Alaska Native/American Indian |
0.2 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
|
Asian/Pacific Islander |
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
|
Black |
31.1 |
31.6 |
30.4 |
|
Hispanic |
0.8 |
1.5 |
1.0 |
|
White |
63.5 |
62.5 |
64.2 |
|
Two or more races |
N/A |
N/A |
- |
|
Other/Unknown |
4.9 |
5.6 |
4.0 |
|
Total %3 |
102.3 |
102.3 |
100.0 |
|
Number |
9,930 |
10,611 |
16,572 |
|
Maltreatment Type of Child Victims (%) |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
|
Emotional abuse |
1.8 |
1.2 |
2.3 |
|
Medical neglect |
3.1 |
3.1 |
3.3 |
|
Neglect |
43.0 |
43.5 |
42.9 |
|
Physical abuse |
19.6 |
20.0 |
20.0 |
|
Sexual abuse |
22.4 |
21.0 |
21.0 |
|
Other |
10.1 |
11.2 |
10.5 |
|
Unknown |
- |
- |
- |
|
Total %4 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Number |
9,930 |
10,611 |
16,572 |
2) Children with more than one
report of substantiated or indicated maltreatment may be counted
more than once. Back
3) Percentages may total more than
100 percent because Hispanics may be counted both by Hispanic
ethnicity and by race. Back
4) Percentages may total more than
100 percent because children could have been victims of more than
one type of maltreatment. Back
|
Number of Children |
In Care on 10/1 |
Entered Care |
Exited Care |
In Care on 9/30 |
Total Served |
|
FY1998 (10/1/97-9/30/98) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
FY1999 (10/1/98-9/30/99) |
8,296 |
5,968 |
3,481 |
10,796 |
14,264 |
|
FY2000 (10/1/99-9/30/00) |
9,034 |
5,480 |
4,370 |
10,144 |
14,514 |
|
Median Length of Stay (Months) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY1998 (10/1/97-9/30/98) |
- |
N/A |
- |
- |
N/A |
|
FY1999 (10/1/98-9/30/99) |
17.5 |
N/A |
12.3 |
13.6 |
N/A |
|
FY2000 (10/1/99-9/30/00) |
17.9 |
N/A |
11.8 |
16.8 |
N/A |
|
Age of Children in Foster Care (%) |
In Care on 10/1/97 |
In Care on 10/1/98 |
In Care on 10/1/99 |
Entered Care During FY 1998 |
Entered Care During FY 1999 |
Entered Care During FY 2000 |
Exited Care During FY 1998 |
Exited Care During FY 1999 |
Exited Care During FY 2000 |
In Care on 9/30/98 |
In Care on 9/30/99 |
In Care on 9/30/00 |
|
Under 1 year |
- |
2.7 |
2.7 |
- |
9.0 |
7.8 |
- |
2.6 |
2.3 |
- |
3.2 |
2.5 |
|
1-5 years |
- |
18.5 |
17.4 |
- |
13.1 |
13.9 |
- |
15.5 |
13.3 |
- |
16.6 |
17.3 |
|
6-10 years |
- |
18.9 |
18.9 |
- |
12.6 |
12.5 |
- |
11.9 |
12.2 |
- |
17.6 |
17.4 |
|
11-15 years |
- |
30.8 |
30.8 |
- |
35.3 |
36.6 |
- |
19.1 |
21.2 |
- |
29.8 |
30.9 |
|
16-18 years |
- |
28.3 |
29.2 |
- |
30.0 |
29.2 |
- |
48.5 |
48.0 |
- |
31.8 |
31.1 |
|
19+ years |
- |
0.7 |
0.9 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2.0 |
2.7 |
- |
1.0 |
0.7 |
|
Unknown |
- |
0.1 |
0.1 |
- |
0.0 |
- |
- |
0.4 |
0.3 |
- |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
Total % |
- |
100.0 |
100.0 |
- |
100.0 |
100.0 |
- |
100.0 |
100.0 |
- |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Number |
- |
8,296 |
9,034 |
- |
5,968 |
5,480 |
- |
3,481 |
4,370 |
- |
10,796 |
10,144 |
|
Race/Ethnicity of Children in Foster Care (%)5 |
In Care on 10/1/97 |
In Care on 10/1/98 |
In Care on 10/1/99 |
Entered Care During FY 1998 |
Entered Care During FY 1999 |
Entered Care During FY 2000 |
Exited Care During FY 1998 |
Exited Care During FY 1999 |
Exited Care During FY 2000 |
In Care on 9/30/98 |
In Care on 9/30/99 |
In Care on 9/30/00 |
|
Alaska Native/American Indian |
- |
0.2 |
0.2 |
- |
0.3 |
0.3 |
- |
0.3 |
0.3 |
- |
0.2 |
0.2 |
|
Asian/Pacific Islander |
- |
0.3 |
0.4 |
- |
0.5 |
0.5 |
- |
0.4 |
0.4 |
- |
0.4 |
0.4 |
|
Black |
- |
38.2 |
40.0 |
- |
35.2 |
30.4 |
- |
29.9 |
31.5 |
- |
39.2 |
38.4 |
|
Hispanic |
- |
1.4 |
1.6 |
- |
1.6 |
2.4 |
- |
1.2 |
2.2 |
- |
1.5 |
1.8 |
|
White |
- |
59.5 |
56.7 |
- |
61.5 |
64.5 |
- |
67.5 |
64.8 |
- |
58.0 |
57.4 |
|
Two or more races |
- |
- |
1.2 |
- |
- |
1.0 |
- |
- |
0.3 |
- |
- |
1.4 |
|
Unknown |
- |
0.5 |
0.1 |
- |
1.0 |
0.9 |
- |
0.7 |
0.5 |
- |
0.7 |
0.4 |
|
Total % |
- |
100.0 |
100.0 |
- |
100.0 |
100.0 |
- |
100.0 |
100.0 |
- |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Number |
- |
8,296 |
9,034 |
- |
5,968 |
5,480 |
- |
3,481 |
4,370 |
- |
10,796 |
10,144 |
5) In this and subsequent race/ethnicity tables, data for two or more races may be provided for 1998 and 1999 because of States' resubmissions. However, data for 1998 and 1999 may not capture all children of two or more races and therefore may not be comparable to the 2000 data pertaining to two or more races. Back
|
Overview |
9/30/98 |
9/30/99 |
9/30/00 |
|
Children waiting to be adopted |
- |
1,666 |
2,044 |
|
Children whose parents' rights have been terminated (TPR) |
- |
992 |
397 |
|
Age of Waiting Children (%) |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
|
Under 1 year |
- |
2.1 |
1.5 |
|
1-5 years |
- |
23.9 |
27.4 |
|
6-10 years |
- |
34.1 |
35.9 |
|
11-15 years |
- |
30.0 |
29.4 |
|
16+ years |
- |
8.1 |
4.9 |
|
Unknown |
- |
1.7 |
0.9 |
|
Total % |
- |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Number |
- |
1,666 |
2,044 |
|
Race/Ethnicity of Waiting Children (%) |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
|
Alaska Native/American Indian |
- |
0.2 |
0.2 |
|
Asian/Pacific Islander |
- |
0.2 |
0.2 |
|
Black |
- |
48.3 |
45.7 |
|
Hispanic |
- |
1.9 |
1.9 |
|
White |
- |
49.1 |
49.7 |
|
Two or more races |
- |
- |
2.3 |
|
Unknown |
- |
0.4 |
0.0 |
|
Total % |
- |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Number |
- |
1,666 |
2,044 |
6) Waiting children are children who have a goal of adoption and/or whose parentsÂ’ rights have been terminated. Children 16 years and older with TPR, but with a goal of emancipation, have been excluded from the waiting children and TPR populations. Back
|
Age of Adopted Children (%) |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
|
Under 1 year |
1.5 |
1.0 |
0.5 |
|
1-5 years |
46.9 |
44.5 |
35.3 |
|
6-10 years |
32.3 |
34.0 |
40.6 |
|
11-15 years |
16.3 |
17.0 |
20.4 |
|
16+ years |
3.0 |
3.4 |
3.2 |
|
Unknown |
- |
- |
- |
|
Total % |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Number |
337 |
382 |
431 |
|
Race/Ethnicity of Adopted Children (%) |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
|
Alaska Native/American Indian |
0.3 |
0.8 |
- |
|
Asian/Pacific Islander |
- |
- |
- |
|
Black |
44.8 |
37.4 |
38.3 |
|
Hispanic |
3.6 |
2.4 |
3.0 |
|
White |
51.0 |
59.2 |
56.1 |
|
Two or more races |
- |
- |
1.4 |
|
Unknown |
0.3 |
0.3 |
1.2 |
|
Total % |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Number |
337 |
382 |
431 |
|
1.1 Recurrence of Maltreatment Within 6 Months (%) |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
|
Children without a recurrence |
- |
- |
- |
|
Children with one or more recurrences |
- |
- |
- |
|
Total % |
- |
- |
- |
|
Number |
- |
- |
- |
|
2.1 Maltreatment in Foster Care (%) |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
|
Children maltreated while in foster care |
- |
- |
- |
|
Children not maltreated while in foster care |
- |
- |
- |
|
Total % |
- |
- |
- |
|
Number |
- |
- |
- |
|
3.1 Exits from Foster Care (%) |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
|
Adoption |
- |
7.8 |
8.1 |
|
Guardianship |
- |
0.7 |
0.2 |
|
Reunification |
- |
64.1 |
72.1 |
|
Other |
- |
15.7 |
16.0 |
|
Missing data |
- |
11.7 |
3.6 |
|
Total % |
- |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Number |
- |
3,481 |
4,370 |

|
3.2 Exits of Disabled Children (%) |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
|
Adoption |
- |
18.2 |
24.4 |
|
Guardianship |
- |
0.7 |
- |
|
Reunification |
- |
44.2 |
52.0 |
|
Other |
- |
22.6 |
20.0 |
|
Missing data |
- |
14.2 |
3.6 |
|
Total % |
- |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Number |
- |
274 |
225 |
|
3.3 Exits of Children Over Age 12 at Entry (%) |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
|
Adoption |
- |
0.1 |
0.0 |
|
Guardianship |
- |
0.4 |
0.1 |
|
Reunification |
- |
64.4 |
73.6 |
|
Other |
- |
22.3 |
22.0 |
|
Missing data |
- |
12.8 |
4.2 |
|
Total % |
- |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Number |
- |
2,045 |
2,599 |
|
3.4 Exits to Emancipation (%) |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
|
Children age 12 or younger at entry |
- |
14.5 |
17.8 |
|
Children older than 12 at entry |
- |
84.9 |
82.2 |
|
Missing data |
- |
0.6 |
- |
|
Total % |
- |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Number |
- |
496 |
596 |
|
3.5 Exits by Race/Ethnicity (%) |
Alaska Native/A.I. |
Asian/P.I. |
Black |
Hispanic |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
|
|
Adoption |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
7.5 |
7.8 |
- |
11.9 |
10.4 |
|
|
Guardianship |
- |
11.1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1.3 |
0.1 |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
Reunification |
- |
77.8 |
72.7 |
- |
71.4 |
70.6 |
- |
65.9 |
70.1 |
- |
61.9 |
69.8 |
|
|
Other |
- |
11.1 |
18.2 |
- |
28.6 |
17.6 |
- |
15.7 |
17.6 |
- |
14.3 |
11.5 |
|
|
Missing data |
- |
- |
9.1 |
- |
- |
11.8 |
- |
9.6 |
4.4 |
- |
11.9 |
8.3 |
|
|
Total % |
- |
100.0 |
100.0 |
- |
100.0 |
100.0 |
- |
100.0 |
100.0 |
- |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
|
Number |
- |
9 |
11 |
- |
14 |
17 |
- |
1,041 |
1,378 |
- |
42 |
96 |
|
|
|
White |
Unable to Determine |
Two or More Races |
Missing Data |
|||||||||
|
|
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
|
|
Adoption |
- |
7.9 |
8.2 |
- |
4.2 |
- |
- |
- |
21.4 |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
Guardianship |
- |
0.4 |
0.2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
Reunification |
- |
63.1 |
73.0 |
- |
83.3 |
85.0 |
- |
- |
71.4 |
- |
- |
100.0 |
|
|
Other |
- |
15.8 |
15.6 |
- |
4.2 |
- |
- |
- |
7.1 |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
Missing data |
- |
12.7 |
2.9 |
- |
8.3 |
15.0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
100.0 |
- |
|
|
Total % |
- |
100.0 |
100.0 |
- |
100.0 |
100.0 |
- |
- |
100.0 |
- |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
|
Number |
- |
2,350 |
2,833 |
- |
24 |
20 |
- |
- |
14 |
- |
1 |
1 |
|
|
4.1 Time to Reunification (%) |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
|
Less than 12 mos. |
- |
59.0 |
61.3 |
|
At least 12 mos., but less than 24 mos. |
- |
24.8 |
23.4 |
|
At least 24 mos., but less than 36 mos. |
- |
8.2 |
6.9 |
|
At least 36 mos., but less than 48 mos. |
- |
3.3 |
3.5 |
|
48 or more mos. |
- |
4.3 |
4.0 |
|
Missing data |
- |
0.5 |
0.9 |
|
Total (%) |
- |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Number |
- |
2,233 |
3,150 |

|
4.2 Children Who Entered Foster Care (%) |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
|
Children entering care for the first time |
- |
84.2 |
83.1 |
|
Children re-entering care within 12 mos. of a prior episode |
- |
9.3 |
10.1 |
|
Children re-entering care more than 12 mos. after a prior episode |
- |
6.2 |
6.8 |
|
Missing data |
- |
0.4 |
- |
|
Total (%) |
- |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Number |
- |
5,968 |
5,480 |

|
5.1 Time to Adoption (%) |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
|
Less than 12 mos. |
- |
3.0 |
3.1 |
|
At least 12 mos., but less than 24 mos. |
- |
13.3 |
7.4 |
|
At least 24 mos., but less than 36 mos. |
- |
17.4 |
17.3 |
|
At least 36 mos., but less than 48 mos. |
- |
13.3 |
19.5 |
|
48 or more mos. |
- |
52.6 |
52.4 |
|
Missing data |
- |
0.4 |
0.3 |
|
Total (%) |
- |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Number |
- |
270 |
353 |

|
6.1 Number of Placements by Time in Care (%) |
Year |
Children With 2 or Fewer Placements |
Children With 3 or More Placements |
Missing Data |
Total % |
Number |
|
Less than 12 mos. |
1998 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
At least 12 mos., but <24 mos. |
1998 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
At least 24 mos., but <36 mos. |
1998 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
At least 36 mos., but <48 mos. |
1998 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
48 or more mos. |
1998 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Missing data |
1998 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |

|
7.1 Most Recent Placement Settings of Children Who Entered Care During the Fiscal Year and Were Age 12 or Younger at the Time of This Placement (%) |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
|
Group homes |
- |
8.3 |
5.9 |
|
Institutions |
- |
6.8 |
7.6 |
|
Other settings |
- |
84.5 |
86.4 |
|
Missing data |
- |
0.4 |
- |
|
Total (%) |
- |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Number |
- |
2,264 |
1,987 |
Page B. Walley, Commissioner
Tennessee Department of Children?s Services
615-741-9699
The following are the comments on our State data for the Child Welfare Outcomes 2000: Annual Report.
As a general comment, we have serious concerns about the national standards for compliance with the federal child welfare outcomes being based upon data that are not comparable across states for various reasons. In particular, there is considerable variability in the populations of children included in foster care, how permanency goals and concurrent goals are measured, how states measure and record placements and placement changes, and how types of placements are mapped to the standard AFCARS placement settings. We strongly encourage the Children's Bureau to consider states' concerns about the lack of comparability of data that affect states' performance on the outcomes, especially with such severe consequences as possible financial penalties. We also want to note that the Federal requirement of quarterly reports on progress with regard to the State?s Program Improvement Plan does not permit sufficient time to demonstrate progress on outcomes, although it may permit some assessment of early progress with regard to process measures.
A second general comment is that the Tennessee Department of Children's Services includes both child welfare and juvenile justice programs. As a result, AFCARS numbers and demographic information may be influenced by some juvenile justice cases that were part of the child welfare system for only a brief period of time during the reporting year. We strongly recommend that the Children's Bureau add adjudication type as a required AFCARS data element so that states such as Tennessee and others that include juvenile justice youth can accurately report the full range of children and youth in state custody.
The data in section B indicate a considerable increase in the number and rate of child maltreatment reports and child maltreatment victims from 1998 to 2000. In addition, the data in Section C indicate that there were 1,762 fewer children in foster care on October 1, 1999 (9,034) than there were on September 30, 1999 (10,796). Both of these data issues are due to the fact that during this time period, the State has been transitioning from a legacy system to a SACWIS (TN KIDS). Now that TN KIDS is operational, we anticipate that these data problems will no longer be an issue.
Another data issue is that the data in Section E indicate that 431 children were adopted in FY 2000 (from the AFCARS Adoption Database). However, as shown in outcome measure 5.1, only 353 of the exits from foster care in FY 2000 (from the AFCARS Foster Care Database) were reported as discharges to adoption. The legacy system that we had been using was not capable of handling the adoptions data and consequently a separate reporting method was used for the adoptions AFCARS reporting. The state is confident that its AFCARS Adoption Database numbers are accurate. While there were significant discrepancies in agreement between the two reports during the first half of the fiscal year, problems related to the discrepancies had been largely resolved and, during the second half of the year, the discrepancy involved only 2 cases.
The following discussion focuses on Tennessee?s performance with regard to each of the outcomes assessed in the Child Welfare Outcomes Annual Reports to Congress. Information from the State?s Child and Family Services Review (CFSR) Final Report is used to provide a context for interpreting the State?s performance (the Tennessee CFSR was conducted in FY 2002). Because data reported in the State Data Pages do not address child well-being issues, the last section of this discussion provides information from the CFSR Final Report relevant to the State?s performance in meeting children?s physical health, mental health, and educational needs.
Outcome 1. Reduce recurrence of child abuse and/or
neglect
Tennessee?s attainment of outcome 1 cannot be assessed in
the Federal Comment section because the State does not provide data
to the National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System (NCANDS) for
calculating this outcome measure. Only data from NCANDS are
presented for this outcome measure in the Report to Congress.
However, for the CFSR, the State provided data for this outcome
using an alternative source. These data are presented in
Tennessee?s CFSR Final Report.
Outcome 2. Reduce the incidence of child abuse and/or neglect
in foster care
Tennessee?s attainment of outcome 2 cannot be evaluated in
this Report because the State does not provide data to NCANDS for
calculating this outcome. Only data from NCANDS are presented for
this outcome measure in the Report to Congress. However, for the
CFSR, the State provided data for this outcome using an alternative
source. These data are presented in Tennessee?s CFSR Final
Report.
Outcome 3. Increase permanency for children in foster
care
In fiscal year (FY) 2000, 80.4 percent of children exiting foster
care were discharged to permanent homes (which is lower than the
national median of 84.7 percent), and 76.4 percent of children with
a diagnosed disability exiting foster care were discharged to
permanent homes (which is lower than the national median of 79.5
percent). Although these data suggest that the State is not
consistently effective in achieving permanency for children in
foster care, the data for outcome 3 also indicated that 73.6
percent of children exiting foster care who were older than age 12
at entry into foster care were discharged to permanent homes (which
is higher than the national median of 72.6), and only 17.8 percent
of children exiting foster care through emancipation were age 12 or
younger at the time of entry (which is lower than the national
median of 24.2 percent). These data suggest that the State has
experienced success in achieving permanency for children who are
older than age 12 when they enter foster care and in ensuring that
children who enter foster care at younger ages do not “grow
up” in the system. Information from the CFSR Final Report
suggests that a key barrier to attaining permanency may be the
frequent agency practice of establishing a goal of long-term foster
care when reunification efforts fail without exploring adoption or
guardianship as possible alternatives.
Outcome 4. Reduce time to reunification without increasing
re-entry
In FY 2000, the percentage of all reunifications occurring within
12 months of children?s entry into foster care was 61.3,
which is lower than both the national standard of 76.2 percent and
the national median of 68.0 percent. Information from the CFSR
Final Report identifies the following as potential barriers to
achieving reunification in a timely manner: (1) the lack of
diligent efforts in some cases to engage parents in services to
promote reunification, (2) the tendency of the agency to focus on
the child?s needs rather than the family?s needs in
providing services and conducting assessments, (3) the high
caseloads carried by workers that make it difficult to provide the
necessary level of case management, and (4) insufficient contact
between caseworkers and parents whose children are in foster care
to promote movement toward permanency (contact often occurs less
often than the once-a-month required by agency policy).
Also in FY 2000, the percentage of children re-entering foster care within 12 months of discharge from a prior foster care episode was 10.1, which does not meet the national standard of 8.6 percent, but is almost equal to the national median of 10.3 percent. Information from the CFSR Final Report identifies the following as potential barriers to preventing re-entries into foster care: (1) the lack of adequate assessment in some cases of the change in risk factors prior to reunifying children with their families; and (2) the fact that until 2002, the agency was not able to provide post-reunification services to families for more than 90 days after reunification. However, a new law requires that families be provided with services for 9 months after reunification.
Outcome 5. Reduce time in foster care to adoption
In FY 2000, the percentage of all finalized adoptions occurring
within 24 months of the child?s entry into foster care was
10.5, which is lower than both the national standard of 32.0
percent and the national median of 19.7 percent. Information from
the CFSR Final Report identifies the following as potential
barriers to attaining adoptions in a timely manner: (1) agency
delays in changing permanency goals when reunification efforts are
not successful, (2) agency delays in filing for termination of
parental rights (TPR) and completing home studies in a timely
manner, (3) lack of consistent effort to identify or search for
fathers early on in a case, and (4) delays due to parents?
appeals of TPR decisions.
Outcome 6. Increase placement stability
In FY 2000, the percentage of children who experienced no more
than 2 placements during their first 12 months in foster care was
61.1, which is lower than both the national standard of 86.7
percent and the national median of 84.3 percent. According to
information in the CFSR Final Report, the State believes that the
actual number of placements changes may be higher than the number
reported to the Federal Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and
Reporting System because the State?s management information
system does not capture changes in foster care placements for
children who remain with the same private child placement provider
agency. That is, a child could move from one foster home to
another, but if both foster homes were under the supervision of the
same foster care provider agency, this move would not be recorded
in the State?s management information system. This suggests
that placement stability is a concern for the State. Information
from the CFSR Final Report identifies the following as potential
barriers to achieving placement stability for children in foster
care: (1) a lack of appropriate placements resources to ensure
appropriate matching between children and placements, (2) an
inconsistency on the part of the agency with regard to providing
supportive services to foster parents to help maintain placements
when they are at risk of disruption, and (3) the large number of
adolescents in the system who have serious behavior problems that
result in placement disruptions.
Outcome 7. Reduce placements of young children in group homes
and institutions
In FY 2000, the percentage of children age 12 or younger placed in
a group home or institution was 13.5, which is higher than the
national median of 9.0. Information in the CFSR Final Report
suggests that the high percentage of children who are placed in
group homes when they are age 12 or younger may be attributed in
part to the scarcity of family foster homes, particularly for
children with emotional problems.
Child well-being outcomes
With respect to child well-being, information in the CSFR Final
Report indicates that the State is effective in meeting
children?s physical health needs, including their need for
dental services. However, information from the Final Report also
suggests that the State is less effective in meeting
children?s educational and mental health needs. The Final
Report identifies the following as potential barriers to meeting
these needs: (1) a lack of consistent and adequate assessment of
children?s educational needs and mental health needs; (2) a
failure in some cases to provide services to address identified
educational and mental health needs in some cases; and (3) the
difficulty obtaining high quality mental health services for
children, often due to problems with insurance coverage and waiting
lists for basic services, such as counseling.