Skip Navigation
Administration for Children and Families  
ACF
ACF Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News   |   HHS Home

  Questions?  |  Privacy  |  Site Index  |  Contact Us  |  Download Reader™  |  Print      


Children's Bureau Safety, Permanency, Well-being  Advanced
 Search

North Dakota

Context Data | Outcomes Data | Federal Comment

North Dakota [ Context Data ]

A. Key Context Statistics


General Population
(Census Bureau)

1999

2000

2001

2002

Total children under 18 years

160,092

153,810

151,223

146,812

Race/ethnicity (%)1, 2

 

 

 

 

Alaska Native/American Indian8.57.888.1
AsianN/A0.60.70.8
Asian/Pacific Islander1.2N/AN/AN/A
Black0.80.811
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific IslanderN/AN/A00
Hispanic1.8222
White87.786.686.486.2
Two or more racesN/A2.11.81.8
OtherN/A000

% Child population in poverty

19

15.3

19.5

16.3



Child Welfare Summary

1999

2000

2002

2002

Child maltreatment victims3--1,3831,3591,493
Children in foster care on 9/301,1311,1291,1671,197
Children adopted143108145137


1The convention for the data tables is the following: N/A in the data table means that the category was not applicable for the specific year. A dash (-) means that there is "no value" or the category is a true zero (that is, no children were reported as being in that category). A zero (0) means that there is a value for the category, but the value is less than 0.1 percent.Back
2The multiple and overlapping race categories in this and subsequent race tables are due to changes in the Census Bureau categories beginning in 2000. Because the reporting of these categories is a relatively new process for States, changes in percentages over time may be due to data quality issues.Back
3A child victim is a child who is the subject of a substantiated or indicated maltreatment report. Children with more than one report of substantiated or indicated maltreatment may be counted more than once.Back

B. Child Maltreatment Data (NCANDS)


 

Number

Rate

Maltreatment Information Overview

1999

2000

2001

2002

1999

2000

2001

2002

Children subject of an investigated report alleging child maltreatment 6,9266,9856,9637,08943.3 per 1,00045.4 per 1,00046.0 per 1,00048.3 per 1,000
Child maltreatment victims--1,3831,3591,493-- per 1,0009.0 per 1,0009.0 per 1,00010.2 per 1,000
Child fatalities00120.0 per 100,0000.0 per 100,0000.7 per 100,0001.4 per 100,000


Age of Child Victims (%)

1999

2000

2001

2002

Under 1 Year6.96.666
1-5 years26.326.828.831.4
6-10 years33.632.830.827.2
11-15 years2826.526.728.3
16+ years5.37.37.77.2
Unknown / Missing data0------
Total %100100100100

Number

--

1,383

1,359

1,493



Race/Ethnicity of Child Victims (%)

1999

2000

2001

2002

Alaska Native/American Indian26.221.321.219.3
Asian/Pacific Islander0.20.10.30.7
Black3.53.13.83.8
Hispanic3.321.83.8
White68.873.87273.2
Two or more races0.8------
Total %4103.3100.3100100.8

Number

--

1,383

1,359

1,493



Maltreatment Type of Child Victims (%)

1999

2000

2001

2002

Emotional Abuse48.353.152.552.3
Medical Neglect4.32.61.73.6
Neglect646158.364.6
Physical Abuse12.518.918.422.6
Sexual Abuse7.26.58.29.2
Unknown / Missing data01.43.2--
Other136.3------
Total %5272.6143.5142.3152.3

Number

--

1,383

1,359

1,493



4Percentages may total more than 100 percent because Hispanics may be counted both by Hispanic ethnicity and by race.Back
5Percentages may total more than 100 percent because children could have been victims of more than one type of maltreatment.Back

C. Children in Foster Care (AFCARS Annual Foster Care Database)


Number of Children

In Care on 10/1

Entered Care

Exited Care

In Care on 9/30

Total Served

FY1999 (10/1/98 - 9/30/99)1,0029548251,1311,956
FY2000 (10/1/99 - 9/30/00)9741,0068511,1291,980
FY2001 (10/1/00 - 9/30/01)9821,0138281,1671,995
FY2002 (10/1/01 - 9/30/02)1,0171,0448641,1972,061

Median Length of Stay (Months)

 

FY1999 (10/1/98 - 9/30/99)11N/A810.8N/A
FY2000 (10/1/99 - 9/30/00)10.9N/A6.410.8N/A
FY2001 (10/1/00 - 9/30/01)11N/A7.110.2N/A
FY2002 (10/1/01 - 9/30/02)10.5N/A6.610.5N/A


Age of Children in Foster Care (%)

In Care On: 10/1/98

In Care On: 10/1/99

In Care On: 10/1/00

In Care On: 10/1/01

Entered Care During FY: 1999

Entered Care During FY: 2000

Entered Care During FY: 2001

Entered Care During FY: 2002

Exited Care During FY: 1999

Exited Care During FY: 2000

Exited Care During FY:2001

Exited Care During FY: 2002

In Care On: 9/30/99

In Care On: 9/30/00

In Care On: 9/30/01

In Care On: 9/30/02

Under 1 Year5.95.44.23.512.4128.810.12.54.732.786.85.46
1-5 years13.514.415.716.216.71416.318.31614.916.816.916.616.316.919
6-10 years20.619.917.918.215.615.615.813.115.615.21312.419.517.417.715.5
11-15 years33.634.735.935.235.436.736.435.626.729.126.828.732.934.93534.7
16-18 years25.724.825.326.519.921.722.622.938.235.439.438.322.523.624.524.5
19+ years0.70.70.90.4--------10.70.810.50.80.40.4
Unknown / Missing data----0.1------0.1------0.1----0.10.1--
Total %100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100

Number

1,002

974

982

1,017

954

1,006

1,013

1,044

825

851

828

864

1,131

1,129

1,167

1,197



Race/Ethnicity of Children in Foster Care (%)

In Care On: 10/1/98

In Care On: 10/1/99

In Care On: 10/1/00

In Care On: 10/1/01

Entered Care During FY: 1999

Entered Care During FY: 2000

Entered Care During FY: 2001

Entered Care During FY: 2002

Exited Care During FY: 1999

Exited Care During FY: 2000

Exited Care During FY:2001

Exited Care During FY: 2002

In Care On: 9/30/99

In Care On: 9/30/00

In Care On: 9/30/01

In Care On: 9/30/02

Alaska Native/American Indian33.933.132.831.12828.227.126.130.729.727.727.131.331.331.529.7
AsianN/A0.80.40.7N/A0.50.70.5N/A0.2----N/A10.91
Asian/Pacific Islander0N/AN/AN/A0.2N/AN/AN/A0.2N/AN/AN/A0N/AN/AN/A
Black1.82.41.63.22.31.83.52.41.62.22.22.92.41.92.82.8
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific IslanderN/A----0N/A--0.20N/A--0.10.2N/A--0--
Hispanic3.12.53.1354.22.75.45.33.934.13.12.92.74.3
White59.560.360.258.363.462.16361.761.361.864.76361.560.859.457.9
Two or more racesN/A0.91.83.5N/A3.22.93.8N/A2.12.32.8N/A22.44.3
Unknown / Missing data--0.10.1--------------------00--
Total %100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100

Number

1,002

974

982

1,017

954

1,006

1,013

1,044

825

851

828

864

1,131

1,129

1,167

1,197



D. Children Waiting to be Adopted (AFCARS Annual Foster Care Database:  Fiscal Year Data)6


Overview

9/30/99

9/30/00

9/30/01

9/30/02

Children waiting to be adopted409343322340
Children whose parents' rights have been terminated (TPR)370262191228


Age of Waiting Children (%)

1999

2000

2001

2002

Under 1 Year18.814.913.714.7
1-5 years31.132.128.328.8
6-10 years29.322.424.522.6
11-15 years19.125.92728.5
16+ years1.24.45.95
Unknown / Missing data0.50.30.60.3
Total %100100100100

Number

409

343

322

340



Race/Ethnicity of Waiting Children (%)

1999

2000

2001

2002

Alaska Native/American Indian24.726.231.427.9
AsianN/A2.61.61.5
Asian/Pacific Islander0.2N/AN/AN/A
Black4.22.93.13.8
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific IslanderN/A------
Hispanic3.43.82.53.5
White65.362.459.355.6
Two or more racesN/A22.27.6
Unknown / Missing data2.2------
Total %100100100100

Number

409

343

322

340



6Waiting children are children who have a goal of adoption and/or whose parents' rights have been terminated (TPR). Children 16 years and older with TPR, but with a goal of emancipation have been excluded from the waiting children and TPR populations.Back

E. Children Adopted (AFCARS Annual Adoption Database)


Age of Adopted Children (%)

1999

2000

2001

2002

Under 1 Year48.342.627.637.2
1-5 years32.233.332.435.8
6-10 years1418.521.414.6
11-15 years4.24.613.110.9
16+ years1.40.95.51.5
Total %100100100100

Number

143

108

145

137



Race/Ethnicity of Adopted Children (%)

1999

2000

2001

2002

Alaska Native/American Indian4.910.223.49.5
AsianN/A------
Asian/Pacific Islander--N/AN/AN/A
Black--3.74.85.8
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific IslanderN/A------
Hispanic74.64.17.3
White14.778.766.265.7
Two or more racesN/A2.81.411.7
Unknown / Missing data0.7------
Total %100100100100

Number

143

108

145

137



Back to Top


North Dakota [ Outcomes Data ]

1. Reduce Recurrence of Child Abuse and/or Neglect (NCANDS)

1.1 Recurrence of Maltreatment Within 6 Months (%)

1999

2000

2001

2002

Children without a recurrence--------
Children with one or more recurrences--------
Total %--------

Number

--

--

--

--



Graph of the Recurrence of Maltreatment Within 6 Months

2. Reduce the Incidence of Child Abuse and/or Neglect in Foster Care (NCANDS, AFCARS Annual Foster Care Database Jan-Sept)

2.1 Maltreatment in Foster Care (%)

1999

2000

2001

2002

Children maltreated while in foster care--------
Children not maltreated while in foster care--------
Total %--------

Number

--

--

--

--



Graph of the Occurance of Maltreatment in Foster Care

3. Increase Permanency for Children in Foster Care (AFCARS Annual Foster Care Database:  Fiscal Year Data)

3.1 Exits from Foster Care (%)

1999

2000

2001

2002

Adoption6.15.210.67.8
Guardianship0.20.50.20.6
Reunification70.170.960.566.7
Other19.418.424.523.4
Missing data4.25.14.11.6
Total %100100100100

Number

825

851

828

864



Percent Exits from Foster Care

1999200020012002
Graph of Exits from Foster Care in 1999Graph of Exits from Foster Care in 2000Graph of Exits from Foster Care in 2001Graph of Exits from Foster Care in 2002
 

3.2 Exits of Disabled Children (%)

1999

2000

2001

2002

Adoption3.585.472.87.2
Guardianship------0.5
Reunification68.89.816.562.5
Other21.9--9.728.7
Missing data5.84.911.2
Total %100100100100

Number

398

41

103

432



3.3 Exits of Children Over Age 12 at Entry (%)

1999

2000

2001

2002

Adoption0.4--0.90.4
Guardianship0.40.90.40.8
Reunification66.76760.365.3
Other26.125.135.832.1
Missing data6.27.12.61.3
Total %100100100100

Number

448

463

464

476



3.4 Exits to Emancipation (%)

1999

2000

2001

2002

Children age 12 or younger at entry----10.917.2
Children older than 12 at entry10010089.182.8
Missing data--------
Total %100100100100

Number

42

43

46

58



3.5 Exits by Race/Ethnicity (%)

Alaska Native/A.I.

Asian

Asian/Pacific Islander

Black

Native Hawaiian/ Other P.I.

 

1999

2000

2001

2002

1999

2000

2001

2002

1999

2000

2001

2002

1999

2000

2001

2002

1999

2000

2001

2002

Adoption5.149.24.7N/A--------N/AN/AN/A----16.74N/A------
Guardianship--------N/A--------N/AN/AN/A--------N/A------
Reunification64.463.252.462.4N/A100------N/AN/AN/A15.431.611.132N/A--100100
Other25.722.932.831.2N/A--------N/AN/AN/A7.75.3----N/A------
Missing data4.79.95.71.7N/A------N/A------
Total %100100100100N/A100----100N/AN/AN/A100100100100N/A--100100

Number

253

253

229

234

N/A

2

--

--

2

N/A

N/A

N/A

13

19

18

25

N/A

--

1

2

 

 

Hispanic

White

Unable to Determine

Two or More Races

Missing Data

 

1999

2000

2001

2002

1999

2000

2001

2002

1999

2000

2001

2002

1999

2000

2001

2002

1999

2000

2001

2002

Adoption6.8--165.76.76.111.28.6--------N/A11.1--25--------
Guardianship--------0.40.80.40.9--------N/A--------------
Reunification77.381.8606071.573.463.468.8--------10088.963.270.8--------
Other15.99.11634.31717.122.219.9--------N/A--15.84.2--------
Missing data--9.18--4.32.72.81.8--------N/A--21.1----------
Total %100100100100100100100100--------100100100100--------

Number

44

33

25

35

506

526

536

544

--

--

--

--

7

18

19

24

--

--

--

--



4. Reduce Time to Reunification Without Increasing Re-entry (AFCARS Annual Foster Care Database:  Fiscal Year Data)

4.1 Time to Reunification (%)

1999

2000

2001

2002

Less than 12 mos.73.281.480.880.9
At least 12 mos., but less than 24 mos.20.813.915.413
At least 24 mos., but less than 36 mos.3.82.733.8
At least 36 mos., but less than 48 mos.2.11.30.21
48 or more mos.--0.70.40.7
Missing data0.2--0.20.5
Total %100100100100

Number

578

603

501

576



Graph of Time to Reunification



4.2 Children Who Entered Foster Care (%)

1999

2000

2001

2002

Children entering care for the first time70.471.366.267.5
Children re-entering care within 12 mos. of a prior episode16.519.41919.5
Children re-entering care more than 12 mos. after a prior episode9.1710.29.7
Missing data42.44.63.3
Total %100100100100

Number

954

1,006

1,013

1,044



Graph of Re-entries Into Foster Care

5. Reduce Time in Foster Care to Adoption (AFCARS Annual Foster Care Database:  Fiscal Year Data)

5.1 Time to Adoption (%)

1999

2000

2001

2002

Less than 12 mos.2211.411.49
At least 12 mos., but less than 24 mos.2215.92528.4
At least 24 mos., but less than 36 mos.1436.420.528.4
At least 36 mos., but less than 48 mos.4215.922.719.4
48 or more mos.--20.520.514.9
Missing data--------
Total %100100100100

Number

50

44

88

67



Graph of Time to Adoption

6. Increase Placement Stability (AFCARS Annual Foster Care Database)

6.1 Number of Placements by Time in Care (%)

Year

Children With 2 or Fewer Placements

Children With 2 or Fewer Placements

Missing Data

Total %

Number

Less than 12 mos.199988.811.2--1001,140
200087.112.60.31001,210
200181.214.44.31001,220
200284.515.20.21001,236
At least 12 mos., but less than 24 mos.199969.930.1--100428
200063.536.20.3100359
200159.740.3--100352
200262.637.4--100398
At least 24 mos., but less than 36 mos.199967.432.6--100138
200054.545.5--100167
20014951--100143
200247.552.5--100179
At least 36 mos., but less than 48 mos.199963.336.7--100147
20006139--10077
20014951--100102
200235.764.3--10070
48 or more mos.19996931--100100
200058.340.51.2100163
20015246.91.1100175
200242.757.3--100171
Missing data1999100----1003
200050--501004
2001----1001003
2002100----1007


Graph of Children Experiencing 2 or Fewer Placements

7. Reduce Placements of Young Children in Group Homes or Institutions (AFCARS Annual Foster Care Database)

7.1 Most Recent Placement Settings of Children Who Entered Care During the Fiscal Year and Were Age 12 or Younger at the Time of This Placement (%)

1999

2000

2001

2002

Group homes1.411.73.3
Institutions5.28.85.79
Other settings93.290.292.487.5
Missing data0.2--0.20.2
Total %100100100100

Number

497

489

459

513



Back to Top


North Dakota [ Federal Comment ]

The following discussion focuses on North Dakota’s performance with regard to each of the outcomes assessed in the Child Welfare Outcomes Annual Reports to Congress. The North Dakota Child and Family Services Review (CFSR) was completed in fiscal year (FY) 2001 and compliance with the national standards was based on data from 1999. The final report for that review is available from the Child Welfare Monitoring Documents Library. A discussion of the implications of CFSR findings for North Dakota’s performance on the Report to Congress Outcomes is provided in Child Welfare Outcomes 2000.<br>
The Federal Comment includes an examination of State performance in 2002 and the percent change in performance from 1999 to 2002. A difference in percent change from 1999 to 2002 that was less than 5.0 in either direction was considered to represent “no change in performance.” With the exception of outcome measure 2.1, the data presented in the Report to Congress are rounded to one decimal. However, the percent change in performance was calculated using data rounded to two decimals. Measure 2.1 is rounded to two decimals because the national standard is less than one percent. Key findings of the analyses of national data pertaining to State variation in performance on the outcome measures are incorporated into a State’s Federal Comment when relevant.

Outcome 1. Reduce recurrence of child abuse and/or neglect
North Dakota’s performance on outcome 1 cannot be assessed as part of the Federal Comment section because the State does not provide data to the National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System (NCANDS) to calculate this outcome. To ensure data consistency across States, only data submitted through NCANDS are presented for this outcome in the Report to Congress. However, the State provided 1999 data for this outcome for its CFSR using an alternative source. For that year, the State reported that 11.7 percent of the children who were the subject of a substantiated or indicated child maltreatment report during the first 6 months of the year experienced another substantiated or indicated child maltreatment report within 6 months of the first report. The national standard for this measure is 6.1 percent or fewer.

Outcome 2. Reduce the incidence of child abuse and/or neglect in foster care
North Dakota’s performance on outcome 2 cannot be evaluated as part of the Federal Comment section because the State does not provide data to NCANDS for calculating this outcome. In order to ensure data consistency across States, only data submitted through the NCANDS system are presented for this outcome in the Report to Congress. However, the State provided 1999 data for this outcome for its CFSR using an alternative source. For that year, the State reported that 0.44 percent of the children in foster care for the first 9 months of the calendar year were victims of maltreatment by foster parents or facility staff members. The national standard for this measure is 0.57 percent or fewer.

Outcome 3. Increase permanency for children in foster care
In FY 2002, 75 percent of children exiting foster care in North Dakota were discharged to a permanent home (which is less than the national median of 86.1 percent); 70.0 percent of children with a diagnosed disability who exited from foster care were discharged to a permanent home (which is less than the national median of 79.8 percent); and 66.6 percent of children exiting foster care who were older than age 12 at entry into foster care exited to a permanent home (which is less than the national median of 72.0 percent). However, only 17.2 percent of the children emancipated from foster care were age 12 or younger when they entered foster care (which is less than the national median of 26.9 percent). North Dakota’s performance on the measures for outcome 3 exhibited no change from FY 1999 to FY 2002. These findings suggest that North Dakota continues to experience challenges with regard to finding permanent homes for children exiting foster care. However, a relatively small percentage of those children who exit foster care to emancipation appear to have grown up in foster care.

Outcome 4. Reduce time to reunification without increasing re-entry
In FY 2002, the percentage of all reunifications in North Dakota occurring within 12 months of a child’s entry into foster care was 80.9, which is more than both the national standard (76.2 percent or more) and the national median (68.0 percent). Performance with regard to reunifications within 12 months improved from FY 1999 to FY 2002 (+10.5 percent change).

Because the cross-State analyses found a substantial positive relationship between the percentage of reunifications within 12 months and the percentage of children entering foster care who were re-entering within 12 months of a prior episode, North Dakota’s performance in FY 2002 with regard to reunifications within 12 months must be considered in the context of its re-entry rate. For North Dakota, the percentage of children entering foster care in FY 2002 who were re-entering within 12 months of a discharge from a prior foster care episode was 19.5, which is considerably more than both the national standard (8.6 percent or less) and the national median (9.9 percent). In addition, performance on this measure declined from FY 1999 to 2002 (+18.7 percent change). Thus, while North Dakota had a relatively high percentage of reunifications in FY 2002 within 12 months of entry into foster care, the State also had a relatively high percentage of children entering foster care in FY 2002 who were re-entering within 12 months of a prior episode.

The cross-State analyses also found a substantial positive relationship between performance on the measure of foster care re-entry and the percentage of children entering foster care in the State who were age 16 or older. States with a relatively high percentage of children age 16 and older entering foster care in FY 2002 tended to have a relatively high percentage of children entering foster care who were re-entering with 12 months of a prior episode. For North Dakota, both the percentage of children entering foster care who were age 16 and older (26.9 percent) and the incidence of foster care re-entry (19.5 percent) were in the top quartile of the State rankings. One explanation for this may be that children age 16 and older who enter foster care are often entering because of their own behaviors (or through the juvenile justice system) rather than as a result of maltreatment, and they may leave the foster care system before behavior problems are fully resolved. This is particularly relevant to North Dakota, because this State provides child welfare foster care services to children in the juvenile justice system.

Outcome 5. Reduce time in foster care to adoption
In FY 2002, the percentage of all finalized adoptions occurring within 24 months of a child’s entry into foster care was 37.4. However, this percentage is difficult to interpret, because there was a substantial discrepancy between the number of finalized adoptions the State provided in its AFCARS Adoption data submission (137 adoptions) and the number of exits from foster care to a finalized adoption provided in the State’s AFCARS Foster Care data submission (67 exits from foster care to a finalized adoption). Thus, over 50 percent of the children reported to the AFCARS Adoption Data Base are not accounted for in “time to adoption” assessed by outcome measure 5.1. This discrepancy also was found in prior years.

Outcome 6. Increase placement stability
In FY 2002, the percentage of children who experienced no more than 2 placement settings during their first 12 months in foster care was 84.5, which does not meet the national standard (86.7 percent or more), but is about equal to the national median (84.1 percent). North Dakota exhibited no change in performance on this measure from FY 1999 to FY 2002.

Outcome 7. Reduce placements of young children in group homes and institutions
In FY 2002, the percentage of children age 12 or younger placed in a group home or institution was 12.3, which is more than the national median of 8.6 percent. North Dakota’s performance on this measure declined substantially from FY 1999 to FY 2002 (+85.0 percent change).

Back to Top

Return to Chapter VI State Data Pages

Return to Table of Contents