Skip Navigation
Administration for Children and Families  
ACF
ACF Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News   |   HHS Home

  Questions?  |  Privacy  |  Site Index  |  Contact Us  |  Download Reader™  |  Print      


Children's Bureau Safety, Permanency, Well-being  Advanced
 Search

State Data Pages

Connecticut Context Data

A. Key Context Statistics

GENERAL POPULATION IN 1997

 

Total children under 18 yrs

792,161

  • Alaska Native/American Indian

0%

  • Asian/Pacific Islander

3%

  • Black

11%

  • Hispanic

12%

  • White

74%

Child population in poverty

10%

Child population living in metropolitan areas

95%

CHILD WELFARE

 

Child maltreatment victims during 1997

18,178

Children in foster care on 9/30/98

6,683

Children adopted during FY 1998

229*

>
*See State Commentary


B. Child Maltreatment Data
(NCANDS SDC, 1997)

OVERVIEW

Count

Rate

Children subject of an investigated report alleging child maltreatment

37,031

47 per 1,000

Child maltreatment victims (1)

18,178

23 per 1,000

Child fatalities

-

-


AGE

Under

1-5 Yrs

6-10 Yrs

11-15 Yrs

16+ Yrs

Unknown

Total

Number

Child victims

4%

31%

32%

24%

8%

1%

100%

18,178


RACE/ETHNICITY

Alaska Native/A.I.

Asian/Pacific Islander

Black

Hispanic

White

Other

Unable to Determine/Missing

Total (2)

Number

Child victims

0%

0%

21%

16%

32%

16%

30%

115%

18,178


MALTREATMENT TYPE

Emotional

Medical Neglect

Neglect

Physical Abuse

Sexual Abuse

Other

Unknown

Total (3)

Number

Child victims

66%

5%

90%

22%

6%

13%

0%

202%

18,178

(1) Children with more than one report of substantiated or indicated maltreatment may be counted more than once.
(2) Percentages may total more than 100 percent because Hispanics may be counted both by Hispanic ethnicity and by race.
(3) Percentages may total more than 100 percent because children could have been victims of more than one type of maltreatment.


C. Children in Foster Care
(AFCARS Annual Foster Care Database, FY 1998)

OVERVIEW

In Care on 10/1/97

Entered Care (FY 1998)

Exited Care (FY 1998)

In Care on 9/30/98

Total Served

Children

5,143

5,222

3,682

6,683

10,365

Median length of stay (months)

9.5

N/A

6.4

11.4

N/A


AGE

Under 1 Yr

1-5 Yrs

6-10 Yrs

11-15 Yrs

16-18 Yrs

19 + Yrs

Missing

Total

Number

In care on 10/1/97

5%

31%

27%

26%

10%

1%

0%

100%

5,143

Entered care (FY 1998)

10%

26%

24%

31%

8%

0%

0%

99%

5,222

Exited care (FY 1998)

6%

27%

24%

26%

17%

1%

0%

101%

3,682

In care on 9/30/98

4%

29%

28%

28%

11%

1%

0%

101%

6,683


RACE/ETHNICITY

Alaska Native/A.I.

Asian/Pacific Islander

Black

Hispanic

White

Unable to Determine /Missing

Total

Number

In care on 10/1 /97

0%

0%

37%

30%

32%

0%

99%

5,143

Entered care (FY 1998)

0%

0%

31%

36%

32%

0%

99%

5,222

Exited care (FY 1998)

0%

0%

33%

35%

31%

0%

99%

3,682

In care on 9/30/98

0%

0%

35%

32%

33%

0%

100%

6,683


D. Children Waiting to be Adopted on 9/30/1998 (4)
(AFCARS Annual Foster Care Database, FY 1998)

OVERVIEW

Children waiting to be adopted

728

• Children whose parents' rights have been terminated (TPR)

728


AGE

Under
1 Yr

1-5 Yrs

6-10 Yrs

11-15 Yrs

16-17 Yrs

Missing

Total

Number

Waiting children

1%

37%

39%

19%

3%

1%

100%

728


RACE/ETHNICITY

Alaska Native/A.I.

Asian/Pacific Islander

Black

Hispanic

White

Unable to Determine /Missing

Total

Number

Waiting children

0%

0%

39%

25%

36%

0%

100%

728

(4) Waiting children are children who have a goal of adoption and/or whose parental rights have been terminated. Children 16 years and older with TPR, but with a goal of emancipation have been excluded from the waiting children and TPR populations.


E. Children Adopted
(AFCARS Annual Adoption Database, FY 1998)

AGE

Under 1 Yr

1-5 Yrs

6-10 Yrs

11-15 Yrs

16+ Yrs

Missing

Total

Number

Children

1%

49%

36%

13%

1%

0%

100%

229


RACE/ETHNICITY

Alaska Native/A.I.

Asian/Pacific Islander

Black

Hispanic

White

Unable to Determine /Unknown

Total

Number

Children

0%

0%

31%

12%

44%

13%

100%

229

 

Connecticut Outcomes Data

1. Reduce Recurrence of Child Abuse and/or Neglect
(NCANDS, DCDC 1997)

1.1 Recurrence of Maltreatment

 

Children without a recurrence within 12 months

82%

Children with one or more recurrences within 12 months

18%

Total

100%

Number

16,326


2. Reduce the Incidence of Child Abuse and/or Neglect in Foster Care

2.1 Maltreatment in Foster Care

Children maltreated while in foster care

To be reported in 2001

Children not maltreated while in foster care

To be reported in 2001

Total

To be reported in 2001

Number

To be reported in 2001


3. Increase Permanency for Children in Foster Care
(AFCARS Annual Foster Care Database, FY 1998)

3.1 Exits from Foster Care

 

Adoption

9%

Guardianship

6%

Reunification

41%

Other

3%

Missing

42%

Total

101%

Number

3,682

Pie Chart

3.2 Exits of Disabled Children

 

Adoption

0%

Guardianship

0%

Reunification

39%

Other

6%

Missing

55%

Total

100%

Number

110


3.3 Exits of Children Age 12 or Older at Entry

 

Adoption

2%

Guardianship

2%

Reunification

23%

Other

8%

Missing

66%

Total

101%

Number

1,378


3.4 Exits by Race/Ethnicity

Alaska Native/ A.I.

Asian/Pacific Islander

Black

Hispanic

White

Unable to Determine

Missing

Adoption

0%

0%

12%

5%

9%

0%

0%

Guardianship

7%

0%

6%

6%

4%

0%

0%

Reunification

64%

80%

39%

45%

36%

0%

0%

Other

0%

0%

3%

2%

4%

0%

0%

Missing

29%

20%

39%

41%

47%

0%

0%

Total

100%

100%

99%

99%

100%

0%

0%

Number

14

5

1,218

1,301

1,144

0

0


3.5 Exits to Emancipation

 

Children age 12 or younger at entry

6%

Children older than 12 at entry

94%

Missing

0%

Total

100%

Number

36



4. Reduce Time to Reunification Without Increasing Re-entry
(AFCARS Annual Foster Care Database, FY 1998)

4.1 Time to Reunification

 

Less than 12 months

71%

At least 12 months, but less than 24 months

16%

At least 24 months, but less than 36 months

8%

At least 36 months, but less than 48 months

3%

48 or more months

1%

Missing

1%

Total

100%

Number

1,494

Chart

4.2 Children Who Entered Foster Care in FY 1998

 

Children entering care for the first time

68%

Children re-entering care within 12 months of a prior episode

26%

Children re-entering care more than 12 months after a prior episode

6%

Missing

1%

Total

101%

Number

5,222


5. Reduce Time in Foster Care to Adoption
(AFCARS Annual Foster Care Database, FY 1998)

5.1 Time to Adoption

 

Less than 12 months

55%

At least 12 months, but less than 24 months

34%

At least 24 months, but less than 36 months

2%

At least 36 months, but less than 48 months

1%

48 or more months

3%

Missing

5%

Total

100%

Number

321


Chart

5.2 Time to Adoption for Children Age 3 or Older at Entry

 

Less than 12 months

56%

At least 12 months, but less than 24 months

36%

At least 24 months, but less than 36 months

2%

At least 36 months, but less than 48 months

0%

48 or more months

1%

Missing

5%

Total

100%

Number

247

Chart


6. Increase Placement Stability
(AFCARS Annual Foster Care Database, FY 1998)

6.1 Number of Placements by Time in Care

Less than 12 mos.

At least 12 mos., but < 24

At least 24 mos., but < 36

At least 36 mos., but < 48

48 or more mos.

Missing

Children with 2 or fewer placements

85%

76%

76%

79%

84%

91%

Children with 3 or more placements

15%

24%

24%

21%

16%

9%

Missing

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

Total

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

Number

5,963

2,273

1,119

488

412

110


7. Reduce Placements of Young Children in Group Homes or Institutions
(AFCARS Annual Foster Care Database, FY 1998)

7.1 Most Recent Placement Settings of Children Who Entered Care During FY 1998 and Were Age 12 or Younger at the Time of This Placement

Group homes

0%

Institutions

7%

Other settings

92%

Missing

0%

Total

99%

Number

3,374

 

Connecticut State Comments

Kristine Ragaglia, Esq., Director
Connecticut Department of Children and Families
(860) 550-6300

Connecticut joins others in affirming the fundamental principles of safety, permanency, and well-being for children as the basic values of child welfare. We also affirm that our practice must be outcome-based and we must be held accountable in our efforts to achieve those principles. Concurrently, we wish to express our belief that national comparisons are misleading and can influence conclusions that are incorrect. The variance in State statutes, policies, data collection, funding, and social welfare values cannot be over-stated. The role of systems other than the child welfare agency also cannot be ignored in assessing outcomes for children.

Having stated our caution, our comments regarding some of the context data follow. To begin, Connecticut reports all child maltreatment fatalities to DCF, including those victims who were not previously known to the agency.

“Child Victims” is a discrete count of children, but maltreatment types are duplicate counts.

“Children Waiting to be Adopted” in Child Welfare Context Data, Section D, includes all children whose parental rights have been terminated. That total includes children in pre-adoptive homes, children in foster care in which foster parents are adopting, youth in Independent Living, and children who have treatment needs that must be satisfied before placement in a family setting can be effected.

“Children Adopted” in the Child Welfare Context Data, Section E, is discrepant with Child Welfare Outcome Measure 5.1, “Reduce Time in Foster Care to Adoption,” and the latter is more consistent with the actual number of adoptions in Connecticut in FY 1998 (314).

The amount of missing data is an indication of the complexity of the system, and/or a mapping difficulty between the State elements and AFCARS. Connecticut plans to research the missing data and to roll out an additional component of our SACWIS this fiscal year that will include treatment planning. These enhancements will impact on the collection of data. We close requesting acknowledgement that child welfare practice and information systems are dynamic. We must be permitted to comment in depth about the data, the influences of law, policy, and external systems on the measures for which we are held accountable and the goals that we strive to achieve.

 

Return to State Data Pages