Skip ACF banner and navigation
Department of Health and Human Services logo
Questions?  
Privacy  
Site Index  
Contact Us  
   Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News Search  
Administration for Children and Families US Department of Health and Human Services

Children's Bureau Safety, Permanency, Well-being  Advanced
 Search

 

Section 1 Introduction

The National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System (NCANDS) is the primary source of national information on abused and neglected children known to State child protective services agencies. Findings from the NCANDS are based on aggregate data from all States and case-level data from a number of States that provide automated case records for analysis. The rate of children reported to State agencies and the rate of child victims per 1,000 children younger than 18 years of age are included in this report. This is the sixth consecutive year that information based on the findings of the NCANDS has been published.

This section of the document discusses the background of the NCANDS, describes its two components, the Summary Data Component (SDC) and the Detailed Case Data Component (DCDC), summarizes data collection methods, and provides an overview of the report.

1.1 Development of the NCANDS

The National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect (NCCAN) established the NCANDS to respond to the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (Public Law 93-247), as amended, which called for the creation of a coordinated national data collection and analysis program, both universal and case-specific in scope. In 1988, the NCCAN embarked on a collaborative effort with the States to collect and analyze annual child abuse and neglect data from child protective services agencies in the 50 States, the District of Columbia, the territories, and the Armed Services.

A State Advisory Group (appendix A) helped to identify data items and definitions that represent a national profile of child maltreatment. Subsequently, the State representatives assisted in the pilot testing and implementation of the NCANDS. The State Advisory Group continues to play an important role in the development of the NCANDS.

The design of the NCANDS was guided by the needs in the field of child welfare and the capabilities of State data systems to produce the information. The resulting two-pronged approach of the NCANDS allows for the collection and analysis of aggregate data collected through the SDC and case-level data collected through the DCDC. Brief descriptions of the SDC and DCDC follow:

This report is based on the aggregate data collected through the 1995 SDC. In addition, case-level data collected through the 1995 DCDC are used to elaborate on key SDC findings. A discussion of the DCDC data collection methods and analyses of its data elements may be found in Child Abuse and Neglect Case-Level Data 1993: Working Paper 1. Copies of this document are available from the National Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and Neglect Information.

Eleven States (Delaware, Illinois, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Missouri, New Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Vermont, and Washington) that were able to produce case-level data from their automated information systems submitted 1995 data for the DCDC. Although these States are not a statistically representative sample of the United States, the volume of data that is available contributes additional insight into the characteristics of child abuse and neglect. Data on nearly 360,000 unduplicated reports including more than 530,000 children were collected. The child population in these 11 States is approximately one-third of the population in the United States younger than 18 years old. Data on selected topics are presented in this report. Additional findings will be published later in 1997.

1.2 SDC Data Collection Methods

The SDC data collection instrument (appendix B) consists of 15 data items on four child maltreatment data topics. The topics include report data, disposition data, victim data, and perpetrator data. The SDC Data Collection Forms and Glossary were mailed to the States in the spring of 1996. Technical assistance was available to those States that requested help in responding to the SDC. Data analyzed in this document were collected from all 50 States, the District of Columbia, and the Armed Services.

In addition to providing the data, representatives from each State agency were asked to provide supplementary information or clarifications regarding their responses to specific data items. These comments provide a more thorough understanding of each State's data and the national findings. The State comments on 1995 data are included in section 3.

As the completed forms were received, they were reviewed for data consistency and logic as well as substantive clarity. When necessary, follow-up questions were sent to the States. States were also able to review and modify data submissions from previous years. Consequently, some of the findings in this report may differ from those cited in earlier publications.

1.3 SDC Data Analysis Process

After the 1995 SDC data were reviewed and finalized, they were entered into a spreadsheet and subsequently analyzed using statistical software. To determine national figures for some important data items, estimates were computed for missing data. In addition, in several analyses, rates per unit of the population were calculated. Population estimates were obtained from the U.S. Bureau of the Census.

1.4 Overview of the Report

Section 2 of this document presents the main findings based on the SDC data submitted by the States for 1995. Data collected from 11 States through the DCDC are used to supplement the SDC findings. Section 3 presents the data tables that were generated from the 1995 SDC data submissions and provides explanatory comments related to each State's data.

Appendix A lists the participants in the State Advisory Group. The SDC Data Collection Forms and Instructions are provided in appendix B. Additional information on the issues involved in the data analyses is presented in appendix C, Technical Notes. Issues that are discussed include estimating procedures, calculation of population rates, and duplicated and unduplicated counts of children. Data tables supporting the DCDC findings are included in appendix D.