|
Home > Statistics & Research > AFCARS Assessment Reviews > Texas Assessment Review > Case File Summary Report
Case File Summary Report
State: Texas
The purpose of the case file review is to ensure that
information that is submitted to AFCARS accurately reflects what is
in the hard copy case records. This process generally does not
identify new problems, but usually confirms the findings of the
test case scenarios and the review of the State's AFCARS system
documentation. The case file review involved all members of the
State and Federal teams, technical and program.
This summary report provides information on the number of cases
selected in the sample, the number of cases reviewed, and any
relevant general information regarding the analysis of the results.
The matrix that follows provides information on the number of
records that had matching information and the number of records
that had information that did not match what was submitted to
AFCARS. The chart below provides information on how many cases were
in the sample, how many were reviewed on-site and how many were
actually analyzed during the post-site visit phase. Some cases
could not be analyzed because of insufficient information provided
by the reviewer. For elements having a significant number of
inconsistencies between the AFCARS record and the paper file, the
information has been incorporated into the findings matrices under
Tab A.
Foster Care
| Number of Cases in Sample |
80 |
| Number of Cases Reviewed |
38 |
| Number of Cases in Final Analysis |
38 |
| Number of Juvenile Justice Cases |
2 |
Adoption
| Number of Cases in Sample |
20 |
| Number of Cases Reviewed |
18 |
| Number of Cases in Final Analysis |
18 |
As a result of the case file review, problems were identified
regarding data entry for the Juvenile Justice cases. One problem is
that the circumstances associated with removal are not reported.
The information is never put into the system. This is because the
circumstances of removal are associated with the investigation
stage and the section does not get completed on the juvenile
justice youth. Another problem is with the dates of first and
current removal. The dates reported to AFCARS are reflecting the
dates the youth left home, not when they entered a community based
reimbursable placement.
|