Measuring Improper Authorizations for Payment in the Child Care Program:
Improper Authorization for Payment Data Collection Instructions [Approved August 31, 2007]
Download editable Word document (1.66 MB) or view in PDF (766KB) in PDF format.
IV. GENERATING A SAMPLE OF CASES FOR REVIEW
States select a statewide random sample of at least 271 active cases. A sample of 271 cases is projected to achieve a State level improper authorizations for payment rate within five percent precision at the 90% confidence level.[2] This Section details steps for the selection process. The steps include three areas in which States have flexibility and which are discussed in more detail below: the decision to sample 271 or 276 cases, how frequently monthly sampling frames will be collected, and the source for the required random numbers. As indicated in Step 1, Exhibit 1, States are required to submit these decisions by email to the Child Care Manager in the ACF Regional Office before the end of October of the calendar year prior to the reporting year.
The CCB has designated a 12 month review period, based on the Federal Fiscal Year ending September 30, for the data collection methodology. The purpose of the 12 month review period is to gain a representative estimate of the annualized amount of improper authorizations for payments.
The State estimates of the five error measures will be calculated using all cases examined during the review period. States which choose to sample 271 cases will randomly select 23 cases for each of the first seven months and 22 cases for each of the last five months of the 12 month review period (e.g., October - April, 23 cases per month will be selected and May - September 22 cases per month will be selected). Alternatively States may choose to select 23 cases for each month of the review period, yielding a total of 276 cases. Adding five cases to the annual required total allows States to select the same number of cases for each of the 12 review months.
The primary sampling unit for this analysis is an active case (child) for whom a child care subsidy was authorized for payment during a sample review month. An authorization for payment is the subsidy amount authorized during eligibility determination or redetermination for a sample review month, based on the case record documentation.
Each sampling unit will be identified by the following information:
- Sequential number;
- Child ID;
- County of service; and
- Sample month.
States determine their own parameters for creating unique Child IDs, adhering to the following criteria when creating the Child IDs:
- Each child in the sampling frame receives a unique Child ID. If several children exist within a family, case or household, each child will be assigned a unique Child ID.
- The unique Child ID does not contain identifying information; but rather it is linked to a county or State data system, so that the county or State can pull the case record if the child were selected for the study.
States create 12 sampling frames of active cases (i.e., one sampling frame per month for each month in the 12 month review period). The review period is the most recent Federal Fiscal Year ending prior to the submission date for the State Improper Authorizations for Payment Report. For example, for a June 30, 2008 submission date, the review period would be October 1, 2006 through September 30, 2007. For a June 30, 2009 submission date, the review period would be October 1, 2007 through September 30, 2008.
Once each sampling frame has been created, States randomly select the monthly sample of 22 or 23 cases (271 (or 276) cases during the review period). Once this process is complete, States randomly select 3 replacement cases for each sampling frame. States may choose to select more than 3 replacement cases for each sampling frame. States use a replacement case only if a case selected does not meet the study criteria for valid reasons. Examples of valid reasons include: natural disaster making the case record unavailable, the case has been referred to a State's fraud investigation unit, or the case is under appeal. Exhibit 3 provides instructions for each of the steps and includes examples using timeframes applicable for the second implementation year. If a State chooses to select more than 3 replacement cases for each sampling frame, the State will replace "(3)" in steps 5, 6, and 7 by whatever larger number of replacement cases the State has chosen to select.
Exhibit 3. Selecting the Monthly Sample |
||
| Steps | Instructions | Examples |
|---|---|---|
1. Determine frequency of monthly sample selection |
|
Example one (Select 6 monthly sampling frames, two times per year): |
2. Create 12 Monthly Sampling Frames |
For each month of the 12 month review period, generate a list of all cases authorized to receive a child care payment during that review month:
|
For each month of the 12 month review period, generate a list of all cases authorized to receive a child care payment during that review month:
|
3. Calculate Sampling Interval to Select Sample Cases. |
|
|
4. Select Sample Cases |
|
|
|
|
|
6. Select Re-placement Cases |
|
|
7. Create additional monthly sampling frames for each month of the sampling period. |
|
Example one (Select 6 monthly sampling frames, 2 times per year):
|
States then send the original sample list, including the unique child ID and county of service, to the person/office designated to receive them. The designated person/office is responsible for making sure case records are pulled according to the States’ agreed upon review schedule and assigning the case records for review.
2To illustrate the use of confidence limits, two assumptions must be made: (1) the eligibility error rate variable is the percent of clients who exhibit an eligibility error during the review month; and (2) 271 cases are sampled and 50% show an eligibility error (this is the most conservative assumption about the error rate in terms of yielding the largest confidence interval). The confidence limits are calculated as follows: [m = 1.645(SQRT(p(1-p)/n))], where m is the 90% confidence limit (or interval), SQRT is the square root, n is the sample size, and p is the proportion of the sample found to be in error. Following the assumptions, the confidence interval would be calculated as [m = 1.645(SQRT(.5(.5)/100) = .05 (or 5%)]. The 90% confidence interval can be described in two ways: (1) with 90% confidence, the error rate for this sampled population is between 45% and 55%; or (2) with 90% confidence, 50% of the population is in error with a margin of error for this estimate of +/- 5%. Selecting at least 271 cases assures that the confidence limits are +/- 5% or less.
3 If a State chooses to select more than 3 replacement cases for each sampling frame, the State will replace "(3)" in steps 5, 6, and 7 by whatever larger number of replacement cases the State has chosen to select.
V. CUSTOMIZING THE RECORD REVIEW WORKSHEET: >>
