State Assessment of Internal Controls Final Report, May 2007
Download Guide in Word (1,622 KB) or PDF (676 3KB) format.
Appendix B. Potential Team Members and Functions
Each State must examine its organizational structure to determine how to make assignments for completing the Instrument. For example, some States are county administered, while others use contractors to administer some or all child care services within the State. Some pilot States included counties or contractors to participate on the State Project Team.
The following table lists how the pilot States assigned potential team members to functional areas for completion of the Instrument.
Potential Team Members and Functions |
||
State |
County |
Contractor |
High Level Management: I, II, IV, V |
High Level Management: I, II, IV, V |
|
Mid Level Management: I, II, IV, V |
Mid Level Management: I, II, IV, V |
|
Audits: I, II, V |
|
|
Human Resources: I, II |
Human Resources: I, II |
Human Resources: I, II |
Information Technology (IT): III |
Information Technology (IT): III |
Information Technology (IT): III |
Program Staff that also work with IT system: III |
Program Staff that also work with IT system: III |
Program Staff that also work with IT system: III |
Program Staff: III |
|
|
Eligibility Staff: III |
Eligibility Staff: III |
Eligibility Staff: III |
Quality Assurance: III |
|
|
Licensing: III |
|
|
Operations: III |
|
|
Finance/Accounting: I, II, V |
Finance/Accounting: I, II, V |
Finance/Accounting: I, II, V |
Public Information Officer: I, V |
|
|
Legislative Liaison: I, V |
|
|
Previous Page | Table of Contents | Appendix C. >>