State Survey Analysis Report
Download this document in Word (1,076 KB) or PDF (1.28 MB)
Exhibit 10(b-4). Proportion of Improper Payments from and Funds to Regulated and Unregulated Providers
In contrast, Exhibit 10(b-4) shows three State agencies that provide a higher proportion of funding to regulated providers report a higher or equal proportion of improper payments attributed to unregulated providers (CT, MD, PR). Mississippi (MS) provides a higher proportion of funding to unregulated providers and reports a higher proportion of improper payments attributed to regulated providers.
Proportion of Improper Payments from and Funds to Regulated and Unregulated Providers (see Bar Graph below for a visual representation of data.) |
||||
| State | Improper Payments from | Funds to | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regulated | Unregulated | Regulated | Unregulated | |
| Connecticut | 10% | 90% | 68% | 32% |
| Maryland | 50% | 50% | 87% | 13% |
| Mississippi | 65% | 35% | 27% | 73% |
| Puerto Rico | 20% | 80% | 70% | 30% |
