Skip Navigation
acfbanner  
ACF
Department of Health and Human Services 		  
		  Administration for Children and Families
          
ACF Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News   |   HHS Home

  Questions?  |  Privacy  |  Site Index  |  Contact Us  |  Download Reader™Download Reader  |  Print Print      


The Child Care Bureau   Advanced
Search

State Survey Analysis Report

Download this document in Word (1,076 KB) or PDF (1.28 MB)


Activities to Verify Accuracy of Information

14. For each activity listed below, indicate whether or not your State performs it to verify the accuracy of information needed to determine eligibility for and/or proper amount of a program payment. If yes, indicate, when in the process the step or activity is performed, and how often it is performed. (State agencies were also asked to indicate the 3 steps or activities considered the most effective; however some agencies identified less than 3 steps or activities as most effective.)

Exhibit 14 shows 25 State agencies most frequently require documentation from the client to verify the accuracy of eligibility information. Over three-quarters of State agencies (21) rate this activity as most effective (AL, CA(DE), CA(DSS), CT, DC, GA, KS, KY, MD, MA, MN, MS, MO, MT, NE, NC, OK, UT, WA, WV, WI).

All 25 State agencies report initiating a fraud investigation, if warranted to verify the accuracy of eligibility information. However, only six State agencies rate this activity as most effective (KY, MN, MS, OH, OK, UT).

Nineteen State agencies conduct program integrity/quality control reviews (AL, CA(DE), CA(DSS), CT, DC, GA, KS, KY, MD, MA, MN, MS, MT, NE, NC, UT, WA, WV, WI) and 11 State agencies rate this activity as most effective (CA(DE), GA, KY, MD, MA, MN, MS, MT, NC, WA, WV).

Eighteen State agencies conduct telephone, fax, or e-mail contact (AL, AZ, CA(DSS), CT, DC, GA, KY, MD, MA, MN, MS, MO, NE, NC, UT, WA, WV, WI). Only five State agencies rate this activity most effective (AZ, DC, MS, NE, WV).

Seventeen State agencies access online data bases (AZ, CA(DSS), CT, GA, KS, MD, MA, MN, MT, MO, OK, PR, NE, NC, UT, WA, WI) and 10 State agencies rate this activity as most effective (AZ, CT, GA, KS, MD, OK, NC, UT, WA, WI).

Sixteen State agencies match automated computer files (AZ, CA(DSS), CT, DC, GA, KS, MN, MS, MO, MT, NE, NC, UT, WA, WV, WI) and seven rate this activity as most effective (AZ, CA(DSS), DC, KS, MO, NE, WI).

Nine State agencies conduct home visits (AZ, CA(DSS), CT, KY, MA, NC, OH, PR, UT) and two State agencies fingerprint clients (MS, CA(DSS)). Only one State agency (CT) rates home visits as most effective and one State agency CA(DSS) rates fingerprinting as most effective.

Six State agencies report performing other activities, including: on site auditing visits to providers, supervisory case reviews, annual audits, provider attendance reports and parent work and school verifications (AZ, CA (DE), DC, MA, MT, NE). Individual State agency responses are detailed in Appendix 14.

(View Bar Graph)

Exhibit 14. Activities Performed and Considered Most Effective to Verify Accuracy of Information

Steps or activities performed Total States
Performed Steps or Activities Indicated as Most Effective
a. Require documentation from client AL, AZ, CA, CA2, CT, DC, GA, KS, KY, MD, MA, MN, MS, MO, MT, NE, NH, NC, OH, OK, PR, UT, WA, WV, WI AL, CA, CA2, CT, DC, GA, KS, KY, MD, MA, MN, MS, MO, MT, NE, NC, OK, UT, WA, WV, WI
b. Fingerprint clients CA2, MO CA2
c. Access online database AZ, CA2, CT, GA, KS, MD, MA, MN, MO, MT, NE, NC, OK, PR, UT, WA, WI AZ, CT, GA, KS, MD, NC, OK, UT, WA, WI
d. Match automated computer files AZ, CA2, CT, DC, GA, KS, MN, MS, MO, NE, NC, OK, PR, UT, WA, WI AZ, CA2, DC, KS, MO, NE, WI
e. Conduct telephone, fax, or e-mail contacts AL, AZ, CA2, CT, DC, GA, KY, MD, MA, MN, MS, MO, NE, NC, OH, UT, WA, WV, WI AZ, DC, MS, NE, WV
f. Conduct home visits AZ, CA2, CT, KY, MA, NC, OH, PR, UT CT
g. Initiate a fraud investigation if warranted AL, AZ, CA, CA2, CT, DC, GA, KS, KY, MD, MA, MN, MS, MO, MT, NE, NH, NC, OH, OK, PR, UT, WA, WV, WI KY, MN, MO, OH, OK, UT
h. Conduct program integrity/quality control review AL, CA, CA2, CT, DC, GA, KS, KY, MD, MA, MN, MS, MT, NH, NC, UT, WA, WV, WI CA, GA, KY, MD, MA, MN, MS, MT, NC, WA, WV
i. Other AZ, CA, DC, MA, MT, NE CA, MA, MT

 

 

Exhibit 14. Activities Performed and Considered Most Effective to Verify Accuracy of Information

Image: Bar Graph representing Exhibit 14. Activities Performed and Considered Most Effective to Verify Accuracy of Information, read Table below for 508 compliant rendering of this data.

VIII. - Sources Used and Considered Most Effective to Ensure Accurate Payments >>