Skip Navigation
acfbanner  
ACF
Department of Health and Human Services 		  
		  Administration for Children and Families
          
ACF Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News   |   HHS Home

  Questions?  |  Privacy  |  Site Index  |  Contact Us  |  Download Reader™Download Reader  |  Print Print      


The Child Care Bureau   Advanced
Search

State Survey Analysis Report

Download this document in Word (1,076 KB) or PDF (1.28 MB)


Sources Used and Considered Most Effective to Ensure Accurate Payments

15.  Data sharing: Indicate whether or not your State utilizes this source to better ensure accurate payments under the program. (This question also asked State agencies to indicate when in the process the source is used, and/or how often that source is used, and the 3 items considered the most effective.)

Regarding data sharing, Exhibit 15 shows what data sources State agencies most frequently report using and consider most effective to ensure accurate payments:

  • Twenty State agencies report using other human service programs in your agency/State to better ensure payment accuracy (AL, AZ, CA(DSS), CT, GA, KS, KY, MA, MN, MS, MO, MT, NE, NH, NC, OH, PR, UT, WA, WV). Ten State agencies rate this source as most effective (AZ, CT, GA, KS, MN, MS, MO, NC, UT).
  • Nineteen State agencies report using Child Support to better ensure payment accuracy (AL, AZ, CT, KS, MA, MD, MN, MS, MO, MT, NE, NH, NC, OH, OK, UT, WA, WV, WI). Nine State agencies rate this source as most effective (AZ, CT, KS, MD, MN, MO, NC, WA, WV).
  • Nineteen State agencies report using SSI – Supplemental Security Income (SSI) data to ensure payment accuracy (AL, AZ, CA(DSS), CT, GA, KS, MD, MS, MO, NE, NH, NC, OH, OK, PR, UT, WA, WV, WI). Three State agencies rate this source as most effective (MD, MS, WV).
  • Seventeen State agencies report using SSA – Social Security number verification (AL, AZ, CA(DSS), CT, GA, MN, MS, MO, MT, NE, NH, NC, OH, OK, PR, UT,WI). One State agency GA rates this source as most effective.

Exhibit 15 shows the cumulative responses of 24 State agencies regarding use and ratings of 26 sources to ensure accurate payments. (See Appendix 15 for individual State agencies’ responses.)

(View Bar Chart.)

Exhibit 15. Data Sources Used and Considered Most Effective to Ensure Accurate Payments

Source Total States
Used as Data Source Indicated as Most Effective
a. Income Eligibility Verification System (IEVS) AZ, CA2, MD, MA, MN, MO, NE, NH, OK, WA, WI CA2, MO, OK, WA, WI
b. Other human services programs in your agency/State AL, AZ, CA2, CT, GA, KS, KY, MA, MN, MS, MO, MT, NE, NH, NC, OH, PR, UT, WA, WV AZ, CT, GA, KS, MN, MS, MO, NC, UT
c. State department of labor or employment security AZ, CA2, CT, GA, MD, MN, MS, MO, NE, NH, NC, OK, WA, WI AZ, CA2, MD, NC, OK, WI
d. State directory of new hires CA2, MN, MO, NE, NH, NC, OK, UT, WA, WI CA2, WA
d. State directory of new hires AZ, CT, MT, NE, NC, OK, WI  
f. Public Assistance Reporting Information System (PARIS) MD, MO, NE, OK, UT, WA, WI UT
g. State data (from other States) on length of TANF receipt CA2, KY, MN, NH, NC, OK  
h. State data (from other States) on potential concurrent TANF receipt CA2, MA, MN, MO, NE, NH, NC, OK, WA, WV, WI  
i. State data (from other States) on client or provider debarment from benefits, for fraud or other infraction CA2, KY, MA, MN, MO, MT, NC, OK, WV  
j. Lottery agencies AZ, MO, NH, OK  
k. Prisons and criminal justice agencies at State level AZ, CA2, CT, MA, MN, MO, MT, NC, UT, WV, WI MN
l. National Criminal Information Center (NCIC) AZ, CA2, CT, MA, MN, MO, MT, NC, UT, WV, WI  
m. Local jails AZ, CA2, CT, MO, MT, OK, UT  
n. Credit bureaus AZ  
o. Financial institutions AZ, MN, MS, NE, NH, OK  
p. State tax intercepts AZ, CA2, CT, KY, MN, MS, MO, MT, NE, UT, WI MS
q. Immigration authorities AZ, CA2, CT, KS, MD, MN, NE, NH, OK, WI KS
r. K-12 school systems AL, AZ, CA, MO, NH, NC, OH, WV, WI WV
s. Community colleges AL, AZ, CA, MO, MT, NE, NH, NC, OH, WA, WV WA
t. Other providers of services, education, training AL, AZ, CA, CT, MN, MO, MT, NE, NH, OH, UT, WA, WV  
u. Child support AL, AZ, CT, KS, MD, MA, MN, MS, MO, MT, NE, NH, NC, OH, OK, UT, WA, WV, WI AZ, CT, KS, MD, MN, MO, NC, WA, WV
v. Social Security Administration (SSA) form W-2 (wage statements) AL, AZ, CA2, GA, MD, MA, MN, MS, NC, OH, PR, UT, WV, WI GA
w. SSA Social Security number verification AL, AZ, CA2, CT, GA, MN, MS, MO, MT, NE, NH, NC, OH, OK, PR, UT, WI NC
x. SSA Supplemental Security Income (SSI) data AL, AZ, CA2, CT, GA, KS, MD, MS, MO, NE, NH, NC, OH, OK, PR, UT, WA, WV, WI MD, MS, WV
y. SSI death information CA2, MD, MN, MO, NE, NH, OH, OK, PR, UT, WA, WI  
z. Other AZ, MT, NE, OK  

Exhibit 15. Data Sources Used and Considered Most Effective to Ensure Accurate Payments

Image: Bar Graph representing Exhibit 15. Data Sources Used and Considered Most Effective to Ensure Accurate Payments, read Table below for 508 compliant rendering of this data.

IX. Recovery of Improper Payments >>