Skip Navigation
acfbanner  
ACF
Department of Health and Human Services 		  
		  Administration for Children and Families
          
ACF Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News   |   HHS Home

  Questions?  |  Privacy  |  Site Index  |  Contact Us  |  Download Reader™Download Reader  |  Print Print      


The Child Care Bureau   Advanced
Search

State Survey Analysis Report

Download this document in Word (1,076 KB) or PDF (1.28 MB)


APPENDIX 6. METHODS USED TO IDENTIFY A TOTAL AMOUNT OF IMPROPER PAYMENTS

6. Which methods, if any, did your State use to identify a total amount of improper payments for the program?

17 States specified their response for Question 6 (Appendix 6: pp. 65–66)

State Findings from other State or local auditors Findings from State or local fraud units Other Methods
Arizona  
Department of Economic Security Office of Special Investigations
Information discovered in the regular course of processing a case and quarterly interfaces with the Unemployment Insurance Administration
Connecticut    
DSS uses audits to identify error rates but has never determined the total amount of error for the program.
District of Columbia    
Attendance/Termination Report
Georgia  
Office of Investigative Services
 
Kansas    
Pulled overpayment data which had been entered on to the State’s eligibility computer system. We did not pull underpayment data from the computer system as most often these are not considered improper payments, simply proper payments for services that were not initially anticipated by the agency (i.e.- the customer worked extra hours in a month).
Kentucky    
Analysis of actual collections of fraud repayments & actual payment adjustments made to Providers for State Fiscal Years 2004 & 2005.
Maryland
Office of the Inspector General investigators and Local Department staff
   
Minnesota  
Minnesota is State supervised and county administered. Child care workers identify the improper payment and the county agencies report the results of their non fraud overpayment and underpayments through their quarterly reports to the State.
 
Montana    
IPV tracking form
Nebraska  
Our agency investigative unit, called Issuance and Collection Center, does a thorough audit of cases that are referred to them.
 
New Hampshire  
The Department relies on its Office of Special Investigations
 
North Carolina
A local audit is required annually for the LPA
Improper payments identified through the monitoring conducted by the Program Compliance Unit of the Division are tracked and a total amount is calculated. The amount of an improper payment caused by parent or provider fraud is calculated by the staff in the LPA.
 
Ohio    
Surveys of the CDJFS
Oklahoma  
Oklahoma Department of Human Services Office of Inspector General
reports of child care overpayments in the OKDHS overpayment system
Utah    
Case workers review past child care issued to ensure that child care was issued correctly.
Washington
State auditors, Operations Review and Consultation, and Payment Review Program
   
Wisconsin  
Local fraud units
 

Appendix 7 >>