State Survey Analysis Report
Download this document in Word (1,076 KB) or PDF (1.28 MB)
APPENDIX 7. ELEMENTS MAINTAINED BY STATES TO DESCRIBE IMPROPER PAYMENTS
7. Which of the following elements, if any, has your State maintained?
7 State agencies specified their response for Question 7 |
|
| State | Other Elements |
|---|---|
| California (DE) | During program audits cases suspected of being fraudulent are referred to the local agency for follow-up. Results of follow-up are tracked. |
| California (DSS) | Because we do not collect overpayment data in the Child Care Program, we use TANF (CalWORKS) overpayment data and presume that it would be similar in the Child Care Program. |
| District of Columbia | Eligibility Determination and Re-determination/Termination Report |
| Missouri | Cross references are made on a regular basis with Bureau of Child Care (licensing agency) and the Maternal and Child Health, Child and Adult Care Food Program. |
| North Carolina | The Division calculates an error and accuracy rate for each LPA based upon record reviews and monitoring findings. |
| Oklahoma | findings from the Single State Audit |
| Washington | Audit 99 is an automated tool used by managers to review cases in the automated system. This tool contains the items which need to be in place in order for eligibility to be determined and payment authorized correctly. |
Appendix 10a >>