Child Care and Development Fund, Report to Congress for Fiscal Years 2002 and 2003
| Table
12b Child Care and Development Fund Average Monthly Percentages of Children Served by Payment Method (FY 2003) |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
States/Territories |
Grants/ Contracts % | Certificates % | Cash % |
| Alabama | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Alaska | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| American Samoa | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| Arizona | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Arkansas | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| California | 40% | 60% | 0% |
| Colorado | 1% | 96% | 3% |
| Connecticut | 31% | 69% | 0% |
| Delaware | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| District of Columbia | 46% | 54% | 0% |
| Florida | 52% | 48% | 0% |
| Georgia | 10% | 90% | 0% |
| Guam | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Hawaii | 0% | 90% | 10% |
| Idaho | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Illinois | 8% | 92% | 0% |
| Indiana | 5% | 95% | 0% |
| Iowa | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Kansas | 0% | 92% | 8% |
| Kentucky | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Louisiana | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Maine | 22% | 77% | 1% |
| Maryland | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Massachusetts | 48% | 52% | 0% |
| Michigan | 0% | 72% | 28% |
| Minnesota | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Mississippi | 19% | 81% | 0% |
| Missouri | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Montana | 0% | 99% | 1% |
| Nebraska | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Nevada | 17% | 83% | 0% |
| New Hampshire | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| New Jersey | 21% | 79% | 0% |
| New Mexico | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| New York | 27% | 73% | 0% |
| North Carolina | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| North Dakota | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Northern Mariana Islands | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Ohio | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Oklahoma | - | - | - |
| Oregon | 5% | 95% | 0% |
| Pennsylvania | 0% | 80% | 20% |
| Puerto Rico | 56% | 44% | 0% |
| Rhode Island | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| South Carolina | 10% | 90% | 0% |
| South Dakota | 1% | 99% | 0% |
| Tennessee | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Texas | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Utah | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| Vermont | 7% | 93% | 0% |
| Virgin Islands | 5% | 95% | 0% |
| Virginia | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Washington | 0% | 75% | 25% |
| West Virginia | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Wisconsin | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Wyoming | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| National Total | 13% | 84% | 3% |
Notes applicable to this table:
| 1. | The source for this table is ACF-800 data for FFY 2003. |
| 2. | A "0%" indication often means the value is less than 0.5% rather than actually zero. |
| 3. | In a few instances, the sum of the categories may not appear to add up to exactly 100% because of rounding. |
| 4. | New York reports monthly averages rather than the disaggregated annual total reported by all other states. |
| 5. | Oklahoma has not yet submitted an ACF-800 for FFY 2003. |