Skip Navigation  
acfbanner  
blueline
Department of Health and Human Services 
		  
		  Administration for Children and Families
          
ACF Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News   |   HHS Home

  Questions?  |  Privacy  |  Site Index  |  Contact Us  |  Download Reader™Download Reader  |  Print Print      


The Child Care Bureau   Advanced
Search

Child Care and Development Fund, Report to Congress for Fiscal Years 2002 and 2003

Table 14b
Child Care and Development Fund
Average Monthly Percentages of Families With TANF as One of Their Sources of Income (FY 2003)
States/Territories
TANF (Yes)
Alabama 8.10%
Alaska 10.30%
American Samoa 0.00%
Arizona 20.40%
Arkansas 41.50%
California 13.00%
Colorado 22.20%
Connecticut 54.60%
Delaware 14.50%
District of Columbia 23.10%
Florida 12.10%
Georgia 17.90%
Guam 31.90%
Hawaii 19.40%
Idaho 2.40%
Illinois 8.60%
Indiana 29.00%
Iowa 42.70%
Kansas 13.10%
Kentucky 2.00%
Louisiana 12.20%
Maine 4.10%
Maryland 11.80%
Massachusetts 18.00%
Michigan 18.30%
Minnesota 22.00%
Mississippi 0.20%
Missouri 25.70%
Montana 20.00%
Nebraska 31.50%
Nevada 34.20%
New Hampshire 27.40%
New Jersey 14.10%
New Mexico 18.10%
New York 34.90%
North Carolina 7.30%
North Dakota 15.60%
Northern Mariana Islands 0.00%
Ohio 16.80%
Oklahoma 18.40%
Oregon 33.00%
Pennsylvania 12.10%
Puerto Rico   - 
Rhode Island 10.50%
South Carolina 23.50%
South Dakota 7.40%
Tennessee 63.30%
Texas 12.50%
Utah 4.80%
Vermont 15.30%
Virgin Islands   - 
Virginia 25.10%
Washington 19.50%
West Virginia 11.00%
Wisconsin 10.50%
Wyoming   -  
National Average 18.30%

Notes applicable to this table:
1. The source for this table is ACF-801 data for FY 2003.
2. National percentages are based on the "adjusted" national numbers unless otherwise indicated. In other words, the national percentages are equivalent to a weighted average of the State percentages, where the weights are the "adjusted" number of families or children served as appropriate.
3. The Invalid/Not Reported column includes families that did not indicate whether TANF was a source of income or not and the family was reported as being in protective services.
4. Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands were unable to report ACF-801 case-level data before report preparation.
5. Alaska’s population reported does not accurately reflect the population served due to sampling difficulties the State is trying to resolve.
6. Wyoming accidentally reversed coding of the TANF variable in their state system. A more accurate estimate is about 11% of child care families in Wyoming receive TANF. Wyoming was not included in the calculation of the national average.

 

Table 15. FY 2002 and FY 2003 Mean Family Co-Payment as a Percentage of Family Income >>