Skip Navigation
Administration for Children and Families  
ACF
ACF Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News   |   HHS Home

  Questions?  |  Privacy  |  Site Index  |  Contact Us  |  Download Reader™  |  Print      


The Child Care Bureau   Advanced
Search

CCDF FFY 1998 Tables and Charts

Index: Cover page | Notes | 1-Children Served | 2-Type of Payment | 3-Care by Major Types | 4-Regulated vs. Non-Regulated Care | 5-Relative Care | 6-Setting Detail | 7-Provider Summary | 8-Consumer Education | Reason for Care Chart | Ages Chart
Related Item: CCDF FFY 1999 Data and Tables

 

Table 6
Child Care and Development Fund
Average Monthly Percentages of Children Served in All Types of Care (FFY 1998)
State Total % of Children Licensed or Regulated Providers Providers Legally Operating Without Regulation Center
Child's Home Family Home Group Home Center Child's Home Family Home Group Home
Relative Non-
Relative
Relative Non-
Relative
Relative Non-
Relative
Alabama 100% - 10% 6% 59% 0% 0% 10% 0% - - 15%
Alaska 100% 0% 16% 3% 35% 2% 3% 11% 30% - - -
American Samoa 100% - 1% - 99% - - - - - - -
Arizona 100% 0% 10% 4% 73% 2% - 10% - - - -
Arkansas 100% - 18% - 82% - - - - - - -
California 100% - 7% 6% 70% 5% 2% 6% 4% - - 1%
Colorado 100% - 19% - 57% 2% 7% 8% 6% - - 0%
Connecticut 100% - 6% 0% 36% 41% 16% - - - - 1%
Delaware 100% - 34% 1% 48% 4% 0% 5% - - - 7%
District of Columbia 100% - 4% - 94% - 1% 1% - - - -
Florida 100% - 8% - 80% 1% 0% 2% 4% - - 5%
Georgia 100% - 7% 2% 76% 1% 3% 4% 8% - - -
Guam 100% - - - 39% 18% - 37% 2% 1% 2% 1%
Hawaii 100% - 8% 0% 22% 3% 3% 45% 12% - - 5%
Idaho 100% - - 14% 44% 0% 1% 17% 22% - - -
Illinois 100% - 11% 1% 29% 11% 21% 22% 4% - - 2%
Indiana 100% 2% 14% - 30% 5% 3% 16% 23% - - 6%
Iowa 100% - 23% 10% 33% 1% 1% 10% 22% - - -
Kansas 100% - 9% 41% 36% 3% 4% 6% - - - -
Kentucky 100% - 5% 1% 61% 1% 1% 9% 23% - - -
Louisiana 100% - - - 49% 22% 14% 2% 13% - - -
Maine 65% - 28% - 29% 0% 0% 2% 5% - - -
Maryland 100% - 31% - 34% 16% 7% 12% 0% - - 0%
Massachusetts 100% - 6% 17% 56% 5% 12% 3% - - - -
Michigan 100% - 11% 9% 19% 14% 17% 30% - - - 0%
Minnesota 100% - 42% - 24% 4% 3% 10% 14% - - 3%
Mississippi 100% - - 1% 69% 9% 3% 10% 8% - - -
Missouri 100% - 15% 2% 37% 0% 0% 21% 22% - 0% 3%
Montana 100% 0% 21% 34% 30% 0% 0% 1% 14% - - -
Nebraska 100% - 32% 9% 58% - - - - - - -
Nevada 100% - 3% 2% 70% 2% 2% 2% 7% - - 11%
New Hampshire - - - - - - - - - - - -
New Jersey 100% - 10% - 74% 1% 0% 4% 10% - - -
New Mexico 100% - 5% 4% 43% 2% 2% 25% 18% - - -
New York 100% - 11% 7% 41% 5% 5% 11% 19% - - -
North Carolina 100% - 11% 1% 81% 1% 0% 5% 1% - - 0%
North Dakota 100% - 44% 27% 26% 3% - - - - - -
Northern Mariana Islands 100% 58% 31% - 11% - - - - - - -
Ohio 100% 0% 35% 1% 65% - - - - - - -
Oklahoma 100% 0% 19% - 81% - - - - - - -
Oregon 100% 0% 21% 1% 16% 5% 9% 14% 30% - 0% 5%
Pennsylvania 100% - 7% 4% 59% 5% 16% 1% 7% - - -
Puerto Rico 100% - - - 65% 1% 0% 12% 8% 6% 8% -
Rhode Island 100% - 8% 0% 64% 4% 6% 18% - - - 0%
South Carolina 100% - 5% 3% 76% - 3% - 13% - - -
South Dakota 100% - 44% 6% 27% 4% 2% 14% 3% - - -
Tennessee 100% - 7% 5% 73% 1% 0% 1% 14% - - -
Texas 100% - 3% 3% 79% 7% - 7% - - - -
Utah 100% - 9% 5% 65% 2% 2% 6% 11% - - -
Vermont 100% - 50% - 44% 0% 6% - - - - -
Virgin Islands 100% - - 6% 62% 3% 0% 16% 8% - - 5%
Virginia 100% 0% 26% - 54% 2% 0% 15% 3% - - 0%
Washington 100% - 23% - 41% 12% 12% 11% - - - -
West Virginia 100% - 50% - 39% 0% 0% 10% - - - 1%
Wisconsin 100% 0% 39% - 60% - - - - - - -
Wyoming 100% - 24% - 31% 8% 6% 16% 16% - - -
National Percentage 100% 0% 13% 3% 55% 6% 6% 9% 6% 0% 0% 1%

 


Notes applicable to this table:
1. The source for this table is ACF-800 data for FFY 1998. The ACF-800 is based on an annual unduplicated count of families and children; i.e. a family or child that receives one hour of service on one day is counted the same as a family or child that receives full-time care throughout the fiscal year.
2. All counts are "adjusted" numbers of families and children unless otherwise indicated. These "adjusted" numbers represent the number funded through CCDF only. The "adjusted" number is the raw or "unadjusted" number reported by the State multiplied by the pooling factor as reported on the ACF-800. A few States have indicated that the pooling factor reported on the ACF-800 is not applicable to the ACF-801. This report takes all these factors into consideration in calculating the "adjusted" numbers or percentages. The District of Columbia reported a pooling factor of only 5%.
3. A "0%" indication often means the value is less than 0.5% rather than actually zero. In a few instances, the sum of the categories may not appear to add up to exactly 100% because of rounding. A "-" indicates that the reported figure is 0 or not reported.
4. Maine and New Hampshire did not report a consistent and/or complete ACF-800 for FFY 1998.
Index: Cover page | List of Tables and Charts | 1-Children Served | 2-Type of Payment | 3-Care by Type | 4-Regulated vs. Non-Regulated | 5-Relative Care | 6-Setting Detail | 7-Provider Summary | 8-Consumer Education | Reason for Care Chart | Ages Chart
Related Item: CCDF FFY 1999 Data and Tables