FFY 2000 CCDF Data Tables and Charts |
| Index:
Cover page | List of
Tables and Charts | 1-Children Served
| 2-Type of Payment | 3-Care by Type
| 4-Regulated vs. Non-Regulated | 5-Relative
Care | 6-Setting Detail | 7-Provider
Summary | 8-Consumer Education |
Reason for Care Chart | Ages
Chart
The entire collection of tables and charts is available
in Excel document. |
|
Child
Care and Development Fund |
| State | Child's Home | Family Home | Group Home | Center |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | 0% | 15% | 6% | 79% |
| Alaska | 5% | 50% | 2% | 43% |
| American Samoa | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| Arizona | 3% | 20% | 5% | 73% |
| Arkansas | 1% | 22% | 0% | 77% |
| California | 5% | 30% | 6% | 58% |
| Colorado | 9% | 34% | 0% | 56% |
| Connecticut | 55% | 8% | 0% | 37% |
| Delaware | 4% | 39% | 2% | 55% |
| District of Columbia | 0% | 3% | 0% | 97% |
| Florida | 1% | 13% | 0% | 87% |
| Georgia | 1% | 17% | 2% | 80% |
| Guam | 17% | 42% | 1% | 40% |
| Hawaii | 8% | 59% | 0% | 34% |
| Idaho | 2% | 41% | 13% | 44% |
| Illinois | 30% | 36% | 1% | 33% |
| Indiana | 6% | 57% | 0% | 37% |
| Iowa | 1% | 51% | 12% | 35% |
| Kansas | 7% | 16% | 41% | 36% |
| Kentucky | 2% | 30% | 1% | 66% |
| Louisiana | 19% | 18% | 0% | 64% |
| Maine | 9% | 50% | 0% | 42% |
| Maryland | 17% | 44% | 0% | 39% |
| Massachusetts | 10% | 11% | 16% | 62% |
| Michigan | 32% | 44% | 8% | 16% |
| Minnesota | 9% | 57% | 0% | 35% |
| Mississippi | 10% | 12% | 2% | 75% |
| Missouri | 0% | 31% | 1% | 68% |
| Montana | 1% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| Nebraska | 2% | 47% | 11% | 41% |
| Nevada | 1% | 12% | 0% | 87% |
| New Hampshire | - | - | - | - |
| New Jersey | 1% | 26% | 0% | 73% |
| New Mexico | 0% | 55% | 5% | 41% |
| New York | 17% | 48% | 5% | 30% |
| North Carolina | 1% | 16% | 1% | 82% |
| North Dakota | 0% | 44% | 29% | 28% |
| Northern Mariana Islands | 45% | 38% | 0% | 17% |
| Ohio | 0% | 37% | 1% | 63% |
| Oklahoma | 0% | 18% | 0% | 82% |
| Oregon | 12% | 51% | 1% | 36% |
| Pennsylvania | 8% | 40% | 3% | 49% |
| Puerto Rico | 2% | 45% | 1% | 52% |
| Rhode Island | 8% | 28% | 0% | 64% |
| South Carolina | 4% | 15% | 3% | 77% |
| South Dakota | 3% | 56% | 9% | 31% |
| Tennessee | 1% | 19% | 5% | 75% |
| Texas | 7% | 13% | 3% | 76% |
| Utah | 0% | 64% | 4% | 32% |
| Vermont | 6% | 55% | 0% | 39% |
| Virgin Islands | 1% | 7% | 14% | 77% |
| Virginia | 1% | 41% | 0% | 58% |
| Washington | 22% | 37% | 0% | 40% |
| West Virginia | 0% | 51% | 2% | 47% |
| Wisconsin | 0% | 37% | 0% | 63% |
| Wyoming | 14% | 42% | 14% | 30% |
| National | 8% | 30% | 3% | 58% |
Notes:
| 1. | The source for this table is ACF-800 data for FFY 2000. |
| 2. | New Hampshire did not submit data for setting type. |
| 3 | A "0%" indication often means the value is less than 0.5% rather than actually zero. |
| 4. | In a few instances, the sum of the categories may not appear to add up to exactly 100% because of rounding. |
| |
| Index: Cover page | List of Tables and Charts | 1-Children Served | 2-Type of Payment | 3-Care by Type | 4-Regulated vs. Non-Regulated | 5-Relative Care | 6-Setting Detail | 7-Provider Summary | 8-Consumer Education | Reason for Care Chart | Ages Chart |


