| FFY 2000 CCDF Data Tables and Charts |
| Index:
Cover page | List of
Tables and Charts | 1-Children Served
| 2-Type of Payment | 3-Care
by Type | 4-Regulated vs. Non-Regulated | 5-Relative
Care | 6-Setting Detail | 7-Provider
Summary | 8-Consumer Education |
Reason for Care Chart | Ages
Chart
The entire collection of tables and charts is available
in Excel document. |
| Child
Care and Development Fund Percent of Children Served in Regulated Settings vs. Settings Legally Operating Without Regulation (FFY 2000) |
| State | Licensed / Regulated | Legally Operating Without Regulation |
|---|---|---|
| Alabama | 74% | 26% |
| Alaska | 55% | 45% |
| American Samoa | 100% | 0% |
| Arizona | 88% | 12% |
| Arkansas | 100% | 0% |
| California | 76% | 24% |
| Colorado | 76% | 24% |
| Connecticut | 43% | 57% |
| Delaware | 81% | 19% |
| District of Columbia | 100% | 0% |
| Florida | 92% | 8% |
| Georgia | 91% | 9% |
| Guam | 31% | 69% |
| Hawaii | 18% | 82% |
| Idaho | 57% | 43% |
| Illinois | 44% | 56% |
| Indiana | 39% | 61% |
| Iowa | 74% | 26% |
| Kansas | 85% | 15% |
| Kentucky | 73% | 27% |
| Louisiana | 64% | 36% |
| Maine | 76% | 24% |
| Maryland | 72% | 28% |
| Massachusetts | 86% | 14% |
| Michigan | 34% | 67% |
| Minnesota | 63% | 37% |
| Mississippi | 78% | 22% |
| Missouri | 86% | 14% |
| Montana | 88% | 12% |
| Nebraska | 76% | 24% |
| Nevada | 72% | 28% |
| New Hampshire | - | - |
| New Jersey | 85% | 15% |
| New Mexico | 47% | 53% |
| New York | 47% | 53% |
| North Carolina | 96% | 4% |
| North Dakota | 96% | 4% |
| Northern Mariana Islands | 100% | 0% |
| Ohio | 100% | 0% |
| Oklahoma | 100% | 0% |
| Oregon | 45% | 55% |
| Pennsylvania | 59% | 42% |
| Puerto Rico | 53% | 47% |
| Rhode Island | 80% | 20% |
| South Carolina | 85% | 15% |
| South Dakota | 81% | 19% |
| Tennessee | 87% | 13% |
| Texas | 83% | 17% |
| Utah | 45% | 55% |
| Vermont | 83% | 17% |
| Virgin Islands | 88% | 12% |
| Virginia | 85% | 15% |
| Washington | 67% | 33% |
| West Virginia | 93% | 7% |
| Wisconsin | 100% | 0% |
| Wyoming | 50% | 50% |
| National | 74% | 26% |
Notes:
| 1. | The source for this table is ACF-800 data for FFY 2000. |
| 2. | New Hampshire did not report the number of children by setting type. |
| 3. | A "0%" indication often means the value is less than 0.5% rather than actually zero. |
| 4. | In a few instances, the sum of the categories may not appear to add up to exactly 100% because of rounding. |
 |
| Index:
Cover page | List of
Tables and Charts | 1-Children Served
| 2-Type of Payment | 3-Care
by Type | 4-Regulated vs. Non-Regulated | 5-Relative
Care | 6-Setting Detail | 7-Provider
Summary | 8-Consumer Education |
Reason for Care Chart | Ages
Chart |