FFY 2000 CCDF Data Tables and Charts |
| Index:
Cover page | List of
Tables and Charts | 1-Children Served
| 2-Type of Payment | 3-Care
by Type | 4-Regulated vs. Non-Regulated
| 5-Relative Care | 6-Setting Detail
| 7-Provider Summary | 8-Consumer
Education | Reason for Care Chart
| Ages Chart
The entire collection of tables and charts is available
in Excel document. |
|
Child
Care and Development Fund
Percent of Children Served in All Types of Care (FFY 2000) |
| State | Total Percent | Licensed or Regulated Providers | Providers Legally Operating Without Regulation | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Child's Home | Family Home | Group Home | Center | Child's Home | Family Home | Group Home | Center | |||||
| Relative | Non- Relative |
Relative | Non- Relative |
Relative | Non- Relative |
|||||||
| Alabama | 100% | 0% | 8% | 6% | 61% | 0% | 0% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 18% |
| Alaska | 100% | 0% | 10% | 2% | 43% | 2% | 3% | 12% | 28% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| American Samoa | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Arizona | 100% | 0% | 10% | 5% | 73% | 2% | 0% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Arkansas | 100% | 1% | 22% | 0% | 77% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| California | 100% | 0% | 13% | 6% | 57% | 4% | 1% | 11% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
| Colorado | 100% | 0% | 20% | 0% | 56% | 2% | 8% | 9% | 5% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Connecticut | 100% | 0% | 8% | 0% | 35% | 42% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
| Delaware | 100% | 0% | 34% | 2% | 45% | 3% | 0% | 5% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
| District of Columbia | 100% | 0% | 2% | 0% | 97% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Florida | 100% | 0% | 10% | 0% | 82% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 2% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
| Georgia | 100% | 0% | 9% | 2% | 80% | 0% | 1% | 2% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Guam | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 31% | 11% | 6% | 34% | 8% | 0% | 1% | 9% |
| Hawaii | 100% | 0% | 5% | 0% | 13% | 5% | 3% | 45% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 21% |
| Idaho | 100% | 0% | 0% | 13% | 44% | 1% | 1% | 21% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Illinois | 100% | 0% | 13% | 1% | 30% | 11% | 19% | 20% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
| Indiana | 100% | 0% | 19% | 0% | 20% | 3% | 2% | 17% | 21% | 0% | 0% | 17% |
| Iowa | 100% | 0% | 27% | 12% | 35% | 0% | 1% | 6% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Kansas | 100% | 0% | 8% | 41% | 36% | 3% | 3% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Kentucky | 100% | 0% | 5% | 1% | 66% | 1% | 1% | 16% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Louisiana | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 64% | 6% | 13% | 1% | 16% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Maine | 100% | 0% | 35% | 0% | 42% | 3% | 5% | 4% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Maryland | 100% | 0% | 34% | 0% | 38% | 12% | 5% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
| Massachusetts | 100% | 0% | 7% | 16% | 62% | 4% | 6% | 4% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Michigan | 100% | 0% | 9% | 8% | 16% | 16% | 17% | 34% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Minnesota | 100% | 0% | 32% | 0% | 31% | 4% | 4% | 8% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
| Mississippi | 100% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 75% | 8% | 2% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Missouri | 100% | 0% | 17% | 1% | 68% | 0% | 0% | 3% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
| Montana | 100% | 0% | 21% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 1% | 1% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Nebraska | 100% | 0% | 25% | 11% | 41% | 0% | 2% | 0% | 22% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Nevada | 100% | 0% | 4% | 0% | 68% | 1% | 0% | 1% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 19% |
| New Hampshire | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| New Jersey | 100% | 0% | 12% | 0% | 73% | 1% | 0% | 4% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| New Mexico | 100% | 0% | 2% | 5% | 41% | 0% | 0% | 36% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| New York | 100% | 0% | 12% | 5% | 30% | 7% | 10% | 15% | 22% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| North Carolina | 100% | 0% | 13% | 1% | 82% | 0% | 0% | 3% | 1% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| North Dakota | 100% | 0% | 40% | 29% | 28% | 0% | 0% | 4% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Northern Mariana Islands | 100% | 45% | 38% | 0% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Ohio | 100% | 0% | 37% | 1% | 63% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Oklahoma | 100% | 0% | 18% | 0% | 82% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Oregon | 100% | 0% | 9% | 1% | 34% | 3% | 8% | 10% | 32% | 0% | 0% | 2% |
| Pennsylvania | 100% | 0% | 6% | 3% | 49% | 3% | 4% | 8% | 26% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Puerto Rico | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 52% | 1% | 0% | 22% | 23% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Rhode Island | 100% | 0% | 16% | 0% | 64% | 3% | 5% | 12% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| South Carolina | 100% | 0% | 5% | 3% | 77% | 0% | 4% | 0% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| South Dakota | 100% | 0% | 41% | 9% | 31% | 2% | 1% | 12% | 4% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Tennessee | 100% | 0% | 7% | 5% | 75% | 1% | 0% | 2% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Texas | 100% | 0% | 3% | 3% | 76% | 7% | 0% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Utah | 100% | 0% | 10% | 4% | 32% | 0% | 0% | 24% | 30% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Vermont | 100% | 0% | 43% | 0% | 39% | 1% | 5% | 1% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Virgin Islands | 100% | 0% | 0% | 14% | 74% | 1% | 0% | 4% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
| Virginia | 100% | 0% | 26% | 0% | 58% | 1% | 0% | 10% | 4% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Washington | 100% | 0% | 26% | 0% | 40% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| West Virginia | 100% | 0% | 46% | 2% | 46% | 0% | 0% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
| Wisconsin | 100% | 0% | 37% | 0% | 63% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Wyoming | 100% | 0% | 7% | 14% | 30% | 9% | 5% | 15% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| National | 100% | 0% | 14% | 3% | 57% | 4% | 4% | 9% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
Notes:
| 1. | The source for this data is ACF-800 data from FFY 2000. |
| 2. | New Hampshire did not report number of children by setting type. |
| 3. | A "0%" indication often means the value is less than 0.5% rather than actually zero. |
| 4. | In a few instances, the sum of the categories may not appear to add up to exactly 100% because of rounding. |
| |
| Index: Cover page | List of Tables and Charts | 1-Children Served | 2-Type of Payment | 3-Care by Type | 4-Regulated vs. Non-Regulated | 5-Relative Care | 6-Setting Detail | 7-Provider Summary | 8-Consumer Education | Reason for Care Chart | Ages Chart |


