FFY 2000 CCDF Data Tables and Charts |
| Index:
Cover page | List of
Tables and Charts | 1-Children Served
| 2-Type of Payment | 3-Care by Type
| 4-Regulated vs. Non-Regulated | 5-Relative
Care | 6-Setting Detail | 7-Provider
Summary | 8-Consumer Education |
Reason for Care Chart | Ages
Chart
The entire collection of tables and charts is available
in Excel document. |
|
Child
Care and Development Fund
Percent of Children Served by Payment Method (FFY 2000) |
| State | Grants / Contracts % | Certificates % | Cash % |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Alaska | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| American Samoa | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Arizona | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Arkansas | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| California | 43% | 57% | 0% |
| Colorado | 2% | 96% | 2% |
| Connecticut | 18% | 82% | 0% |
| Delaware | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| District of Columbia | 73% | 27% | 0% |
| Florida | 71% | 29% | 0% |
| Georgia | 2% | 98% | 0% |
| Guam | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Hawaii | 16% | 0% | 84% |
| Idaho | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Illinois | 12% | 88% | 0% |
| Indiana | 4% | 96% | 0% |
| Iowa | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Kansas | 0% | 93% | 7% |
| Kentucky | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Louisiana | 0% | 64% | 36% |
| Maine | 24% | 76% | 1% |
| Maryland | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Massachusetts | 41% | 59% | 0% |
| Michigan | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Minnesota | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Mississippi | 3% | 97% | 0% |
| Missouri | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Montana | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Nebraska | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Nevada | 19% | 81% | 0% |
| New Hampshire | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| New Jersey | 18% | 82% | 0% |
| New Mexico | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| New York | 24% | 76% | 0% |
| North Carolina | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| North Dakota | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Northern Mariana Islands | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Ohio | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Oklahoma | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Oregon | 9% | 91% | 0% |
| Pennsylvania | 0% | 72% | 28% |
| Puerto Rico | 36% | 64% | 0% |
| Rhode Island | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| South Carolina | 13% | 87% | 0% |
| South Dakota | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Tennessee | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Texas | 0% | 80% | 20% |
| Utah | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| Vermont | 3% | 97% | 0% |
| Virgin Islands | 3% | 97% | 0% |
| Virginia | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Washington | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| West Virginia | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Wisconsin | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Wyoming | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| National | 11% | 83% | 6% |
Notes:
| 1. | The source for this table is ACF-800 data for FFY 2000. |
| 2. | A "0%" indication often means the value is less than 0.5% rather than actually zero. |
| 3. | In a few instances, the sum of the categories may not appear to add up to exactly 100% because of rounding. |
 |
| Index: Cover page | List of Tables and Charts | 1-Children Served | 2-Type of Payment | 3-Care by Type | 4-Regulated vs. Non-Regulated | 5-Relative Care | 6-Setting Detail | 7-Provider Summary | 8-Consumer Education | Reason for Care Chart | Ages Chart |