FFY 2001 CCDF Data Tables and Charts |
| Index:
List of Tables and Charts | 1-Children
Served | 2-Type of Payment | 3-Care
by Type | 4-Regulated vs. Non-Regulated
| 5-Relative Care | 6-Setting
Detail | 7-Provider Summary | 8-Consumer
Education | Reason for Care Chart
| Ages Chart
The entire collection of tables and charts is available
in Excel document. |
|
Child
Care and Development Fund
Percent of Children Served by Payment Method (FFY 2001) |
| State | Grants / Contracts % | Certificates % | Cash % | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama |
0%
|
100%
|
0%
|
59,968
|
| Alaska |
0%
|
100%
|
0%
|
13,924
|
| American Samoa |
0%
|
100%
|
0%
|
912
|
| Arizona |
0%
|
100%
|
0%
|
53,028
|
| Arkansas |
0%
|
100%
|
0%
|
17,641
|
| California |
39%
|
61%
|
0%
|
302,212
|
| Colorado |
2%
|
96%
|
2%
|
51,639
|
| Connecticut |
29%
|
71%
|
0%
|
28,731
|
| Delaware |
0%
|
100%
|
0%
|
13,146
|
| District of Columbia |
52%
|
48%
|
0%
|
4,046
|
| Florida |
68%
|
32%
|
0%
|
136,005
|
| Georgia |
4%
|
96%
|
0%
|
121,035
|
| Guam |
0%
|
100%
|
0%
|
2,636
|
| Hawaii |
31%
|
0%
|
69%
|
30,464
|
| Idaho |
0%
|
100%
|
0%
|
18,862
|
| Illinois |
11%
|
89%
|
0%
|
188,213
|
| Indiana |
1%
|
99%
|
0%
|
66,373
|
| Iowa |
0%
|
100%
|
0%
|
29,711
|
| Kansas |
0%
|
93%
|
7%
|
29,494
|
| Kentucky |
0%
|
100%
|
0%
|
75,756
|
| Louisiana |
0%
|
100%
|
0%
|
77,429
|
| Maine |
26%
|
74%
|
0%
|
6,282
|
| Maryland |
0%
|
100%
|
0%
|
48,436
|
| Massachusetts |
48%
|
52%
|
0%
|
72,213
|
| Michigan |
0%
|
100%
|
0%
|
81,582
|
| Minnesota |
0%
|
100%
|
0%
|
50,304
|
| Mississippi |
21%
|
79%
|
0%
|
52,330
|
| Missouri |
0%
|
100%
|
0%
|
67,507
|
| Montana |
0%
|
100%
|
0%
|
12,589
|
| Nebraska |
0%
|
100%
|
0%
|
25,577
|
| Nevada |
15%
|
85%
|
0%
|
17,583
|
| New Hampshire |
0%
|
100%
|
0%
|
11,948
|
| New Jersey |
18%
|
82%
|
0%
|
83,312
|
| New Mexico |
0%
|
100%
|
0%
|
35,363
|
| New York |
17%
|
83%
|
0%
|
186,481
|
| North Carolina |
0%
|
100%
|
0%
|
118,947
|
| North Dakota |
0%
|
100%
|
0%
|
9,535
|
| Northern Mariana Islands |
0%
|
100%
|
0%
|
383
|
| Ohio |
0%
|
100%
|
0%
|
130,387
|
| Oklahoma |
0%
|
100%
|
0%
|
77,295
|
| Oregon |
7%
|
93%
|
0%
|
52,596
|
| Pennsylvania |
0%
|
78%
|
22%
|
110,931
|
| Puerto Rico |
32%
|
68%
|
0%
|
19,712
|
| Rhode Island |
0%
|
100%
|
0%
|
6,611
|
| South Carolina |
13%
|
87%
|
0%
|
40,828
|
| South Dakota |
1%
|
99%
|
0%
|
6,968
|
| Tennessee |
0%
|
100%
|
0%
|
87,131
|
| Texas |
0%
|
79%
|
21%
|
208,706
|
| Utah |
0%
|
0%
|
100%
|
19,667
|
| Vermont |
4%
|
96%
|
0%
|
7,249
|
| Virgin Islands |
4%
|
96%
|
0%
|
1,278
|
| Virginia |
0%
|
100%
|
0%
|
48,258
|
| Washington |
0%
|
68%
|
32%
|
96,697
|
| West Virginia |
0%
|
100%
|
0%
|
14,461
|
| Wisconsin |
0%
|
100%
|
0%
|
43,331
|
| Wyoming |
0%
|
100%
|
0%
|
6,299
|
| National Total |
12%
|
84%
|
4%
|
3,180,003
|
Notes:
| 1. | The source for this table is ACF-800 data for FFY 2001. |
| 2. | A "0%" indication often means the value is less than 0.5% rather than actually zero. |
| 3. | In a few instances, the sum of the categories may not appear to add up to exactly 100% because of rounding. |
 |
| Index: List of Tables and Charts | 1-Children Served | 2-Type of Payment | 3-Care by Type | 4-Regulated vs. Non-Regulated | 5-Relative Care | 6-Setting Detail | 7-Provider Summary | 8-Consumer Education | Reason for Care Chart | Ages Chart |