FFY 2002 CCDF Data Tables and Charts |
|
Index: List of Tables and Charts | 1-Children Served | 2-Type of Payment | 3-Care by Type | 4-Regulated vs. Non-Regulated | 5-Relative Care | 6-Setting Detail | 7-Provider Summary | 8-Consumer Education | Ages Chart | Reason for Care Chart The entire collection of tables and charts is also available
in Excel
or PDF
format. |
|
Child
Care and Development Fund
Percent of Children Served by Payment Method (FFY 2002) |
| State | Grants / Contracts % | Certificates % | Cash % | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | 0% | 100% | 0% | 56,672 |
| Alaska | 58% | 42% | 0% | 16,717 |
| American Samoa | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1,153 |
| Arizona | 0% | 100% | 0% | 49,852 |
| Arkansas | 0% | 100% | 0% | 20,074 |
| California | 42% | 58% | 0% | 282,039 |
| Colorado | 2% | 96% | 1% | 49,384 |
| Connecticut | 23% | 77% | 0% | 29,725 |
| Delaware | 0% | 100% | 0% | 10,603 |
| District of Columbia | 52% | 48% | 0% | 9,876 |
| Florida | 61% | 39% | 0% | 168,332 |
| Georgia | 5% | 95% | 0% | 122,409 |
| Guam | 0% | 100% | 0% | 762 |
| Hawaii | 32% | 0% | 68% | 33,355 |
| Idaho | 0% | 100% | 0% | 14,336 |
| Illinois | 11% | 89% | 0% | 158,852 |
| Indiana | 2% | 98% | 0% | 78,559 |
| Iowa | 0% | 100% | 0% | 31,245 |
| Kansas | 0% | 93% | 7% | 32,403 |
| Kentucky | 0% | 100% | 0% | 77,966 |
| Louisiana | 0% | 100% | 0% | 101,409 |
| Maine | 26% | 74% | 0% | 7,643 |
| Maryland | 0% | 100% | 0% | 51,287 |
| Massachusetts | 50% | 50% | 0% | 70,970 |
| Michigan | 0% | 100% | 0% | 59,261 |
| Minnesota | 0% | 100% | 0% | 51,106 |
| Mississippi | 2% | 98% | 0% | 37,302 |
| Missouri | 0% | 100% | 0% | 64,868 |
| Montana | 0% | 99% | 1% | 12,348 |
| Nebraska | 0% | 100% | 0% | 26,483 |
| Nevada | 17% | 83% | 0% | 18,213 |
| New Hampshire | 0% | 100% | 0% | 12,195 |
| New Jersey | 17% | 83% | 0% | 80,766 |
| New Mexico | 0% | 100% | 0% | 37,255 |
| New York | 31% | 69% | 0% | 175,128 |
| North Carolina | 0% | 100% | 0% | 123,504 |
| North Dakota | 0% | 100% | 0% | 10,126 |
| Northern Mariana Islands | 0% | 100% | 0% | 343 |
| Ohio | 0% | 100% | 0% | 153,159 |
| Oklahoma | 0% | 100% | 0% | 70,774 |
| Oregon | 7% | 93% | 0% | 49,797 |
| Pennsylvania | 0% | 78% | 22% | 111,628 |
| Puerto Rico | 48% | 52% | 0% | 21,676 |
| Rhode Island | 0% | 100% | 0% | 7,675 |
| South Carolina | 11% | 89% | 0% | 42,663 |
| South Dakota | 2% | 98% | 0% | 8,024 |
| Tennessee | 0% | 100% | 0% | 76,018 |
| Texas | 0% | 100% | 0% | 227,326 |
| Utah | 0% | 0% | 100% | 18,250 |
| Vermont | 6% | 95% | 0% | 7,261 |
| Virgin Islands | 4% | 96% | 0% | 1,557 |
| Virginia | 0% | 100% | 0% | 52,439 |
| Washington | 0% | 70% | 30% | 94,128 |
| West Virginia | 0% | 100% | 0% | 17,612 |
| Wisconsin | 0% | 100% | 0% | 37,271 |
| Wyoming | 0% | 100% | 0% | 6,932 |
| National Total | 13% | 84% | 3% | 3,188,711 |
Notes applicable to this table:
| 1. | The source for this table is ACF-800 data for FFY 2002. |
| 2. | A "0%" indication often means the value is less than 0.5% rather than actually zero. |
| 3. | In a few instances, the sum of the categories may not appear to add up to exactly 100% because of rounding. |
| 4. | New York reports monthly averages rather than the disaggregated annual total reported by all other states. |
 |
| Index: List of Tables and Charts | 1-Children Served | 2-Type of Payment | 3-Care by Type | 4-Regulated vs. Non-Regulated | 5-Relative Care | 6-Setting Detail | 7-Provider Summary | 8-Consumer Education | Ages Chart | Reason for Care Chart |