FFY 2003 CCDF Data Tables and Charts |
Index: List of Tables and Charts | 1-Children Served | 2-Type of Payment | 3-Care by Type | 4-Regulated vs. Non-Regulated | 5-Relative Care | 6-Setting Detail | 7-Provider Summary | 8-Consumer Education | 9-Ages Chart | 10-Reason for Care Chart The entire collection of tables and charts is also available
in Excel
or PDF
format. |
| Child
Care and Development Fund Percent of Children Served in All Types of Care (FFY 2003) |
| State | Total % of Children | Licensed or Regulated Providers | Providers Legally Operating Without Regulation | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Child's Home | Family Home | Group Home | Center | Child's Home | Family Home | Group Home | Center | |||||
| Relative | Non- Relative |
Relative | Non- Relative |
Relative | Non- Relative |
|||||||
| Alabama | 100% | 0% | 6% | 5% | 69% | 0% | 0% | 5% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 15% |
| Alaska | 100% | 0% | 17% | 5% | 46% | 5% | 7% | 9% | 12% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| American Samoa | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Arizona | 100% | 1% | 9% | 6% | 72% | 3% | 0% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Arkansas | 100% | 0% | 25% | 0% | 75% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| California | 100% | 0% | 11% | 9% | 48% | 4% | 1% | 15% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
| Colorado | 100% | 0% | 18% | 0% | 60% | 1% | 6% | 9% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Connecticut | 100% | 0% | 7% | 0% | 50% | 14% | 5% | 11% | 12% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Delaware | 100% | 0% | 31% | 2% | 45% | 4% | 0% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
| District of Columbia | 100% | 0% | 3% | 0% | 58% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 38% |
| Florida | 100% | 0% | 10% | 0% | 80% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
| Georgia | 100% | 0% | 9% | 2% | 83% | 1% | 1% | 3% | 2% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Guam | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 58% | 11% | 0% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 20% |
| Hawaii | 100% | 0% | 6% | 0% | 20% | 6% | 0% | 51% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
| Idaho | 100% | 0% | 0% | 16% | 46% | 1% | 1% | 15% | 21% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Illinois | 100% | 0% | 16% | 1% | 33% | 10% | 14% | 18% | 5% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
| Indiana | 100% | 0% | 31% | 0% | 31% | 0% | 1% | 6% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 22% |
| Iowa | 100% | 0% | 40% | 12% | 37% | 0% | 1% | 3% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Kansas | 100% | 0% | 7% | 41% | 33% | 4% | 4% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Kentucky | 100% | 0% | 7% | 2% | 72% | 1% | 1% | 11% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Louisiana | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 74% | 9% | 6% | 3% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Maine | 100% | 0% | 35% | 0% | 48% | 3% | 4% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Maryland | 100% | 0% | 35% | 0% | 41% | 10% | 3% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
| Massachusetts | 100% | 0% | 5% | 16% | 72% | 2% | 2% | 2% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Michigan | 100% | 0% | 9% | 9% | 16% | 15% | 16% | 36% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Minnesota | 100% | 0% | 28% | 0% | 32% | 7% | 7% | 8% | 15% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
| Mississippi | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 83% | 4% | 1% | 6% | 5% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Missouri | 100% | 0% | 16% | 2% | 42% | 3% | 1% | 10% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
| Montana | 100% | 0% | 16% | 34% | 38% | 1% | 1% | 6% | 5% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Nebraska | 100% | 0% | 22% | 12% | 45% | 0% | 1% | 0% | 19% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Nevada | 100% | 0% | 3% | 1% | 67% | 4% | 1% | 2% | 5% | 0% | 0% | 18% |
| New Hampshire | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| New Jersey | 100% | 0% | 12% | 0% | 71% | 1% | 2% | 4% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| New Mexico | 100% | 0% | 1% | 5% | 48% | 0% | 0% | 33% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| New York | 100% | 0% | 14% | 8% | 36% | 7% | 7% | 12% | 15% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
| North Carolina | 100% | 0% | 13% | 0% | 85% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| North Dakota | 100% | 0% | 35% | 28% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Northern Mariana Islands | 100% | 0% | 78% | 0% | 22% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Ohio | 100% | 0% | 38% | 1% | 61% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Oregon | 100% | 0% | 20% | 3% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 14% | 44% | 0% | 1% | 1% |
| Pennsylvania | 100% | 0% | 10% | 4% | 37% | 3% | 10% | 6% | 30% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Puerto Rico | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 68% | 0% | 0% | 23% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Rhode Island | 100% | 0% | 26% | 0% | 67% | 0% | 1% | 5% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| South Carolina | 100% | 0% | 5% | 4% | 74% | 0% | 5% | 0% | 12% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| South Dakota | 100% | 0% | 39% | 9% | 41% | 0% | 0% | 8% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Tennessee | 100% | 0% | 6% | 5% | 76% | 3% | 1% | 3% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Texas | 100% | 0% | 3% | 3% | 77% | 8% | 0% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Utah | 100% | 6% | 8% | 6% | 38% | 8% | 1% | 32% | 2% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Vermont | 100% | 0% | 32% | 0% | 46% | 0% | 6% | 1% | 16% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Virgin Islands | 100% | 0% | 0% | 8% | 86% | 3% | 1% | 1% | 2% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Virginia | 100% | 0% | 24% | 0% | 62% | 1% | 0% | 8% | 5% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Washington | 100% | 0% | 29% | 0% | 46% | 11% | 8% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| West Virginia | 100% | 0% | 40% | 3% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 6% | 1% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
| Wisconsin | 100% | 0% | 36% | 0% | 64% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Wyoming | 100% | 0% | 14% | 20% | 19% | 31% | 3% | 12% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| National Percentage | 100% | 0% | 14% | 4% | 57% | 4% | 3% | 9% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
Notes applicable to this table:
| 1. | The source for this data is ACF-800 data from FFY 2003. |
| 2. | New Hampshire did not report number of children by setting type. |
| 3. | A "0%" indication often means the value is less than 0.5% rather than actually zero. |
| 4. | In a few instances, the sum of the categories may not appear to add up to exactly 100% because of rounding. |
| 5. | New York reports monthly averages rather than the disaggregated annual total reported by all other states. |
| 6. | Oklahoma has not yet submitted an ACF-800 for FFY 2003. |
 |
| Index: List of Tables and Charts | 1-Children Served | 2-Type of Payment | 3-Care by Type | 4-Regulated vs. Non-Regulated | 5-Relative Care | 6-Setting Detail | 7-Provider Summary | 8-Consumer Education | 9-Ages Chart | 10-Reason for Care Chart |