FFY 2003 CCDF Data Tables (Expanded Set of Tables, June 2006)
Index: 1-Average Monthly Families and Children Served | 2-Percent of Children Served by Payment Method | 3-Percent of Children Served by Types of Care | 4-Percent of Children Served in Regulated Settings vs.Settings Legally Operating without Regulation | 5-Percent Served by Relatives vs. Non-Relatives | 6-Percent of Children Served in All Types of Care | 7-Number of Child Care Providers Receiving CCDF Funds | 8-Methods of Consumer Education Summary | 9-Children Served by Age Group | 10-Children Served by Reason for Care | 11-Children by Racial Group | 12-Children by Latino Ethnicity | 13-Care by Age Category and Type of Care | 14-Care By Age Group and Care Type | 15-Expenditures By Age Group and Care Type | 16-TANF as a Source of Income | 17-Co-payment as a Percent of Family IncomeThe entire collection of tables is also available in Excel or PDF format.
| Table 2 Child Care and Development Fund Percent of Children Served by Payment Method (FFY 2003) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| State | Grants/ Contracts % | Certificates % | Cash % | Total |
| Alabama | 0% | 100% | 0% | 51,894 |
| Alaska | 0% | 100% | 0% | 10,662 |
| American Samoa | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1,450 |
| Arizona | 0% | 100% | 0% | 51,470 |
| Arkansas | 0% | 100% | 0% | 26,670 |
| California | 40% | 60% | 0% | 292,359 |
| Colorado | 1% | 96% | 3% | 47,244 |
| Connecticut | 31% | 69% | 0% | 26,847 |
| Delaware | 0% | 100% | 0% | 11,389 |
| District of Columbia | 46% | 54% | 0% | 8,849 |
| Florida | 52% | 48% | 0% | 208,578 |
| Georgia | 10% | 90% | 0% | 124,153 |
| Guam | 0% | 100% | 0% | 1,072 |
| Hawaii | 0% | 90% | 10% | 20,099 |
| Idaho | 0% | 100% | 0% | 15,465 |
| Illinois | 8% | 92% | 0% | 151,220 |
| Indiana | 5% | 95% | 0% | 71,592 |
| Iowa | 0% | 100% | 0% | 28,994 |
| Kansas | 0% | 92% | 8% | 32,872 |
| Kentucky | 0% | 100% | 0% | 72,093 |
| Louisiana | 0% | 100% | 0% | 119,447 |
| Maine | 22% | 77% | 1% | 10,436 |
| Maryland | 0% | 100% | 0% | 46,164 |
| Massachusetts | 48% | 52% | 0% | 65,584 |
| Michigan | 0% | 72% | 28% | 93,668 |
| Minnesota | 0% | 100% | 0% | 59,216 |
| Mississippi | 19% | 81% | 0% | 37,579 |
| Missouri | 0% | 100% | 0% | 69,913 |
| Montana | 0% | 99% | 1% | 10,350 |
| Nebraska | 0% | 100% | 0% | 24,497 |
| Nevada | 17% | 83% | 0% | 14,250 |
| New Hampshire | 0% | 100% | 0% | 12,487 |
| New Jersey | 21% | 79% | 0% | 76,692 |
| New Mexico | 0% | 100% | 0% | 37,193 |
| New York | 27% | 73% | 0% | 177,207 |
| North Carolina | 0% | 100% | 0% | 123,926 |
| North Dakota | 0% | 100% | 0% | 10,112 |
| Northern Mariana Islands | 0% | 100% | 0% | 769 |
| Ohio | 0% | 100% | 0% | 92,145 |
| Oklahoma | - | - | - | - |
| Oregon | 5% | 95% | 0% | 59,868 |
| Pennsylvania | 0% | 80% | 20% | 112,000 |
| Puerto Rico | 56% | 44% | 0% | 25,917 |
| Rhode Island | 0% | 100% | 0% | 8,722 |
| South Carolina | 10% | 90% | 0% | 42,730 |
| South Dakota | 1% | 99% | 0% | 8,803 |
| Tennessee | 0% | 100% | 0% | 75,587 |
| Texas | 0% | 100% | 0% | 243,750 |
| Utah | 0% | 0% | 100% | 16,681 |
| Vermont | 7% | 93% | 0% | 7,630 |
| Virgin Islands | 5% | 95% | 0% | 1,442 |
| Virginia | 0% | 100% | 0% | 53,463 |
| Washington | 0% | 75% | 25% | 92,365 |
| West Virginia | 0% | 100% | 0% | 16,424 |
| Wisconsin | 0% | 100% | 0% | 30,415 |
| Wyoming | 0% | 100% | 0% | 7,616 |
| National Total | 13% | 84% | 3% | 3,140,019 |
Notes applicable to this table:
| 1. | The source for this table is ACF-800 data for FFY 2003. |
| 2. | A "0%" indication often means the value is less than 0.5% rather than actually zero. |
| 3. | In a few instances, the sum of the categories may not appear to add up to exactly 100% because of rounding. |
| 4. | New York reports monthly averages rather than the disaggregated annual total reported by all other states. |
| 5. | Oklahoma has not yet submitted an ACF-800 for FFY 2003. |
