Child Care Bureau: Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF)

FFY 2003 CCDF Data Tables (Expanded Set of Tables, June 2006)

Index: 1-Average Monthly Families and Children Served | 2-Percent of Children Served by Payment Method | 3-Percent of Children Served by Types of Care | 4-Percent of Children Served in Regulated Settings vs.Settings Legally Operating without Regulation | 5-Percent Served by Relatives vs. Non-Relatives | 6-Percent of Children Served in All Types of Care | 7-Number of Child Care Providers Receiving CCDF Funds | 8-Methods of Consumer Education Summary | 9-Children Served by Age Group | 10-Children Served by Reason for Care | 11-Children by Racial Group | 12-Children by Latino Ethnicity | 13-Care by Age Category and Type of Care | 14-Care By Age Group and Care Type | 15-Expenditures By Age Group and Care Type | 16-TANF as a Source of Income | 17-Co-payment as a Percent of Family Income

The entire collection of tables is also available in Excel or PDF format.

Table 3 Child Care and Development Fund Percent of Children Served by Types of Care (FFY 2003)
State	Child's Home	Family Home	Group Home	Center	Total
Alabama	0%	11%	5%	84%	51,894
Alaska	12%	37%	5%	46%	10,662
American Samoa	0%	0%	0%	100%	1,450
Arizona	3%	19%	6%	72%	51,470
Arkansas	0%	25%	0%	75%	26,670
California	5%	33%	9%	53%	292,359
Colorado	7%	33%	0%	60%	47,244
Connecticut	19%	30%	0%	51%	26,847
Delaware	4%	38%	2%	56%	11,389
District of Columbia	0%	4%	0%	96%	8,849
Florida	0%	12%	0%	88%	208,578
Georgia	2%	13%	2%	83%	124,153
Guam	12%	10%	1%	77%	1,072
Hawaii	6%	68%	0%	26%	20,099
Idaho	2%	36%	16%	46%	15,465
Illinois	24%	39%	1%	36%	151,220
Indiana	1%	46%	0%	53%	71,592
Iowa	1%	50%	12%	37%	28,994
Kansas	8%	18%	41%	33%	32,872
Kentucky	2%	24%	2%	72%	72,093
Louisiana	15%	11%	0%	74%	119,447
Maine	6%	46%	0%	48%	10,436
Maryland	14%	44%	0%	42%	46,164
Massachusetts	4%	7%	16%	72%	65,584
Michigan	31%	44%	9%	16%	93,668
Minnesota	14%	51%	0%	35%	59,216
Mississippi	5%	11%	1%	83%	37,579
Missouri	4%	46%	2%	48%	69,913
Montana	2%	27%	34%	38%	10,350
Nebraska	1%	41%	12%	45%	24,497
Nevada	5%	10%	1%	85%	14,250
New Hampshire	-	-	-	-	12,487
New Jersey	3%	26%	0%	71%	76,692
New Mexico	0%	47%	5%	48%	37,193
New York	14%	41%	8%	37%	177,207
North Carolina	0%	15%	0%	85%	123,926
North Dakota	0%	45%	28%	27%	10,112
Northern Mariana Islands	0%	78%	0%	22%	769
Ohio	0%	38%	1%	61%	92,145
Oklahoma	-	-	-	-	-
Oregon	0%	78%	4%	18%	59,868
Pennsylvania	13%	46%	4%	37%	112,000
Puerto Rico	0%	32%	0%	68%	25,917
Rhode Island	2%	31%	0%	67%	8,722
South Carolina	5%	17%	4%	74%	42,730
South Dakota	1%	49%	9%	41%	8,803
Tennessee	4%	15%	5%	76%	75,587
Texas	8%	12%	3%	77%	243,750
Utah	14%	41%	6%	38%	16,681
Vermont	6%	49%	0%	46%	7,630
Virgin Islands	4%	3%	8%	86%	1,442
Virginia	1%	37%	0%	62%	53,463
Washington	19%	35%	0%	46%	92,365
West Virginia	0%	46%	3%	51%	16,424
Wisconsin	0%	36%	0%	64%	30,415
Wyoming	34%	26%	20%	19%	7,616
National Total	7%	29%	4%	59%	3,140,019

Notes applicable to this table:

1.	The source for this table is ACF-800 data for FFY 2003.
2.	New Hampshire did not submit data for setting type.
3	A "0%" indication often means the value is less than 0.5% rather than actually zero.
4.	In a few instances, the sum of the categories may not appear to add up to exactly 100% because of rounding.
5.	New York reports monthly averages rather than the disaggregated annual total reported by all other states.
6.	Oklahoma has not yet submitted an ACF-800 for FFY 2003.