FFY 2004 CCDF Data Tables and Charts (Preliminary Estimates)
Index: List of Tables and Charts | 1-Children Served | 2-Type of Payment | 3-Care by Type | 4-Regulated vs. Non-Regulated | 5-Relative Care | 6-Setting Detail | 7-Provider Summary | 8-Consumer Education | 9-Ages Chart | 10-Reason for Care Chart
The entire collection of tables and charts is also available in Excel or PDF format.
|
Table
6
Child Care and Development Fund Preliminary Estimates Percent of Children Served in All Types of Care (FFY 2004) |
||||||||||||
| State | Total % of Children | Licensed or Regulated Providers | Providers Legally Operating Without Regulation | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Child's Home | Family Home | Group Home | Center | Child's Home | Family Home | Group Home | Center | |||||
| Relative | Non- Relative |
Relative | Non- Relative |
Relative | Non- Relative |
|||||||
|
Alabama |
100% | 0% | 5% | 4% | 65% | 0% | 0% | 4% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 21% |
|
Alaska |
100% | 0% | 21% | 6% | 48% | 3% | 5% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
|
American Samoa |
100% | 0% | 1% | 0% | 99% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
|
Arizona |
100% | 1% | 9% | 7% | 72% | 3% | 0% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
|
Arkansas |
100% | 0% | 23% | 0% | 77% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
|
California |
100% | 0% | 11% | 9% | 48% | 4% | 2% | 15% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
|
Colorado |
100% | 0% | 17% | 0% | 62% | 1% | 6% | 9% | 5% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
|
Connecticut |
100% | 0% | 6% | 0% | 60% | 16% | 6% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
|
Delaware |
100% | 0% | 31% | 3% | 48% | 4% | 0% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
|
District of Columbia |
100% | 0% | 3% | 0% | 55% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 42% |
|
Florida |
100% | 0% | 10% | 0% | 81% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 0% | 0% | 7% |
|
Georgia |
100% | 0% | 10% | 2% | 83% | 1% | 1% | 2% | 1% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
|
Guam |
100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 53% | 9% | 0% | 7% | 1% | 0% | 0% | 30% |
|
Hawaii |
100% | 0% | 4% | 0% | 15% | 8% | 0% | 30% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 38% |
|
Idaho |
100% | 0% | 0% | 15% | 47% | 1% | 1% | 14% | 22% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
|
Illinois |
100% | 0% | 16% | 1% | 35% | 10% | 11% | 17% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
|
Indiana |
100% | 0% | 33% | 0% | 32% | 0% | 0% | 3% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 24% |
|
Iowa |
100% | 0% | 44% | 8% | 38% | 0% | 1% | 2% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
|
Kansas |
100% | 0% | 8% | 40% | 33% | 4% | 4% | 12% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
|
Kentucky |
100% | 0% | 7% | 2% | 75% | 1% | 1% | 9% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
|
Louisiana |
100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 73% | 10% | 6% | 3% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
|
Maine |
100% | 0% | 35% | 0% | 53% | 1% | 1% | 5% | 5% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
|
Maryland |
100% | 0% | 35% | 0% | 42% | 10% | 3% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
|
Massachusetts |
100% | 0% | 5% | 16% | 73% | 3% | 2% | 2% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
|
Michigan |
100% | 0% | 8% | 9% | 16% | 14% | 17% | 36% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
|
Minnesota |
100% | 0% | 31% | 0% | 34% | 5% | 7% | 6% | 12% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
|
Mississippi |
113% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 87% | 1% | 1% | 6% | 5% | 7% | 6% | 0% |
|
Missouri |
100% | 0% | 15% | 3% | 44% | 3% | 1% | 9% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
|
Montana |
100% | 0% | 14% | 34% | 40% | 1% | 1% | 6% | 4% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
|
Nebraska |
100% | 0% | 19% | 9% | 51% | 0% | 4% | 0% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
|
Nevada |
100% | 0% | 3% | 0% | 67% | 2% | 1% | 2% | 4% | 0% | 0% | 20% |
|
New Hampshire |
100% | 0% | 5% | 0% | 68% | 4% | 6% | 8% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
|
New Jersey |
100% | 0% | 12% | 0% | 73% | 1% | 2% | 3% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
|
New Mexico |
100% | 0% | 2% | 5% | 49% | 0% | 0% | 32% | 12% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
|
New York |
100% | 0% | 14% | 4% | 32% | 8% | 8% | 14% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 2% |
|
North Carolina |
100% | 0% | 13% | 0% | 85% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
|
North Dakota |
100% | 0% | 12% | 30% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 11% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
|
Northern Mariana Islands |
100% | 0% | 59% | 0% | 41% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
|
Ohio |
100% | 0% | 38% | 1% | 61% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
|
Oklahoma |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Oregon |
100% | 0% | 20% | 1% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 15% | 44% | 0% | 1% | 1% |
|
Pennsylvania |
100% | 0% | 9% | 4% | 42% | 5% | 7% | 12% | 23% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
|
Puerto Rico |
100% | 0% | 11% | 0% | 53% | 1% | 0% | 25% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
|
Rhode Island |
100% | 0% | 27% | 0% | 67% | 1% | 1% | 4% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
|
South Carolina |
100% | 0% | 5% | 3% | 73% | 0% | 7% | 0% | 12% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
|
South Dakota |
100% | 0% | 38% | 10% | 41% | 0% | 0% | 8% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
|
Tennessee |
100% | 0% | 6% | 5% | 76% | 3% | 1% | 3% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
|
Texas |
100% | 0% | 3% | 3% | 78% | 9% | 0% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
|
Utah |
100% | 6% | 7% | 6% | 38% | 8% | 1% | 32% | 2% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
|
Vermont |
100% | 0% | 31% | 0% | 47% | 1% | 6% | 1% | 15% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
|
Virgin Islands |
100% | 0% | 1% | 8% | 87% | 1% | 0% | 3% | 1% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
|
Virginia |
100% | 0% | 25% | 0% | 62% | 0% | 7% | 0% | 5% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
|
Washington |
100% | 0% | 30% | 0% | 50% | 9% | 5% | 5% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
|
West Virginia |
100% | 0% | 38% | 3% | 55% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 1% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
|
Wisconsin |
100% | 0% | 36% | 0% | 64% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
|
Wyoming |
100% | 0% | 9% | 8% | 17% | 34% | 3% | 13% | 16% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| National Percentage | 100% | 0% | 14% | 4% | 57% | 4% | 3% | 9% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
Notes applicable to this table:
| 1. | The source for this data is ACF-800 data from FFY 2004. |
| 2. | A "0%" indication often means the value is less than 0.5% rather than actually zero. |
| 3. | In a few instances, the sum of the categories may not appear to add up to exactly 100% because of rounding. |
| 4. | Oklahoma was unable to report FFY 2004 ACF-800 data before report preparation. |
 |
| Index: List of Tables and Charts | 1-Children Served | 2-Type of Payment | 3-Care by Type | 4-Regulated vs. Non-Regulated | 5-Relative Care | 6-Setting Detail | 7-Provider Summary | 8-Consumer Education | 9-Ages Chart | 10-Reason for Care Chart |