Child Care Bureau: Child Care and Development Fund, FFY 2005 Final Data

FFY 2005 CCDF Data Tables (Final Data, June 2007)

Index: 1-Average Monthly Families and Children Served | 2-Percent of Children Served by Payment Method | 3-Percent of Children Served by Types of Care | 4-Percent of Children Served in Regulated Settings vs.Settings Legally Operating without Regulation | 5-Percent Served by Relatives vs. Non-Relatives | 6-Percent of Children Served in All Types of Care | 7-Number of Child Care Providers Receiving CCDF Funds | 8-Methods of Consumer Education Summary | 9-Children Served by Age Group | 10-Children Served by Reason for Care | 11-Children by Racial Group | 12-Children by Latino Ethnicity | 13-Care by Age Category and Type of Care | 14-Care By Age Group and Care Type | 15-Expenditures By Age Group and Care Type | 16-TANF as a Source of Income | 17-Co-payment as a Percent of Family Income

The entire collection of tables is also available in Excel or PDF format.

		Child's Home	Family Home	Group Home	Center	Child's Home		Family Home		Group Home		Center
Table 6 Child Care and Development Fund Average Monthly Percentages of Children Served in All Types of Care (FFY 2005)
State	Total % of Children	Licensed or Regulated Providers				Providers Legally Operating Without Regulation							Invalid/ Not Reported
		Child's Home	Family Home	Group Home	Center	Relative	Non- Relative	Relative	Non- Relative	Relative	Non- Relative	Center
Alabama	100%	0%	5%	4%	67%	0%	0%	1%	0%	0%	0%	13%	11%
Alaska	100%	0%	21%	6%	52%	5%	2%	6%	9%	0%	0%	0%	1%
American Samoa	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Arizona	100%	0%	8%	7%	72%	3%	0%	9%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%
Arkansas	100%	0%	19%	0%	80%	0%	1%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%
California	100%	0%	11%	9%	47%	4%	1%	15%	6%	0%	0%	5%	1%
Colorado	100%	0%	19%	0%	60%	5%	1%	9%	5%	0%	0%	0%	1%
Connecticut	100%	0%	12%	0%	32%	23%	7%	18%	1%	0%	0%	3%	4%
Delaware	100%	0%	32%	3%	55%	3%	0%	5%	0%	0%	0%	2%	0%
District of Columbia	100%	0%	4%	0%	93%	0%	0%	1%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2%
Florida	100%	0%	10%	0%	80%	0%	2%	0%	0%	0%	0%	7%	1%
Georgia	100%	0%	9%	2%	84%	1%	0%	3%	1%	0%	0%	0%	0%
Guam	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hawaii	100%	0%	7%	0%	28%	11%	2%	42%	7%	0%	0%	3%	0%
Idaho	100%	0%	0%	13%	48%	1%	1%	13%	24%	0%	0%	0%	0%
Illinois	100%	0%	18%	1%	28%	12%	13%	7%	19%	0%	0%	4%	0%
Indiana	100%	0%	33%	0%	33%	0%	1%	3%	8%	0%	0%	23%	0%
Iowa	100%	0%	36%	7%	36%	0%	0%	4%	16%	0%	0%	0%	1%
Kansas	100%	0%	8%	40%	32%	3%	3%	12%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2%
Kentucky	100%	0%	8%	2%	77%	0%	0%	9%	6%	0%	0%	0%	0%
Louisiana	100%	0%	0%	0%	69%	11%	6%	3%	7%	0%	0%	3%	0%
Maine	100%	0%	33%	0%	52%	1%	2%	6%	5%	0%	0%	0%	1%
Maryland	100%	0%	36%	0%	40%	10%	3%	9%	0%	0%	0%	0%	1%
Massachusetts	100%	0%	5%	17%	68%	3%	1%	3%	0%	0%	0%	0%	3%
Michigan	100%	0%	7%	9%	14%	28%	0%	36%	0%	0%	0%	0%	6%
Minnesota	100%	0%	33%	0%	34%	6%	4%	5%	9%	0%	0%	2%	7%
Mississippi	100%	0%	0%	1%	70%	3%	1%	13%	11%	0%	0%	0%	0%
Missouri	100%	0%	11%	2%	44%	1%	1%	10%	17%	0%	0%	6%	7%
Montana	100%	0%	13%	35%	39%	2%	1%	5%	4%	0%	0%	0%	0%
Nebraska	100%	0%	22%	8%	53%	0%	0%	0%	17%	0%	0%	0%	1%
Nevada	100%	0%	4%	1%	74%	3%	6%	0%	2%	0%	0%	10%	0%
New Hampshire	100%	0%	8%	0%	56%	3%	3%	5%	16%	0%	0%	0%	8%
New Jersey	100%	0%	12%	0%	74%	1%	1%	3%	6%	0%	0%	0%	4%
New Mexico	100%	0%	2%	6%	48%	2%	1%	31%	10%	0%	0%	0%	0%
New York	100%	0%	10%	9%	30%	9%	9%	11%	17%	0%	0%	2%	3%
North Carolina	100%	0%	17%	0%	81%	0%	0%	1%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%
North Dakota	100%	0%	8%	31%	25%	0%	0%	13%	22%	0%	0%	0%	0%
Northern Mariana Islands	100%	12%	51%	3%	33%	0%	0%	1%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%
Ohio	100%	0%	33%	1%	54%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	12%
Oklahoma	100%	0%	1%	0%	98%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%
Oregon	100%	0%	21%	2%	18%	0%	0%	17%	40%	0%	1%	1%	0%
Pennsylvania	100%	0%	7%	5%	48%	6%	8%	10%	15%	0%	0%	0%	2%
Puerto Rico	100%	1%	2%	1%	47%	0%	1%	31%	5%	0%	0%	13%	0%
Rhode Island	100%	0%	29%	0%	67%	0%	1%	1%	1%	0%	0%	0%	0%
South Carolina	100%	0%	3%	3%	76%	0%	7%	0%	11%	0%	0%	0%	0%
South Dakota	100%	0%	36%	0%	52%	0%	1%	7%	4%	0%	0%	0%	0%
Tennessee	100%	0%	6%	5%	78%	2%	0%	4%	6%	0%	0%	0%	0%
Texas	100%	0%	3%	3%	76%	9%	0%	9%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%
Utah	100%	0%	13%	6%	37%	9%	1%	31%	1%	0%	0%	0%	2%
Vermont	100%	0%	49%	0%	43%	0%	2%	0%	4%	0%	0%	0%	1%
Virgin Islands	100%	8%	0%	6%	84%	1%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%
Virginia	100%	1%	24%	0%	56%	2%	1%	8%	6%	0%	0%	2%	0%
Washington	100%	0%	25%	0%	41%	14%	0%	4%	0%	0%	0%	0%	15%
West Virginia	100%	0%	38%	4%	55%	0%	0%	1%	0%	0%	0%	1%	1%
Wisconsin	100%	0%	35%	0%	59%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	6%
Wyoming	100%	0%	8%	7%	16%	5%	2%	12%	9%	0%	0%	0%	41%
National Percentage	100%	0%	13%	4%	55%	5%	3%	9%	6%	0%	0%	2%	2%

Notes applicable to this table:

1.	The source for this table is ACF-801 data for FFY 2005. In prior years this table was based on the ACF-800 rather than the ACF-801. The CCB recently decided to use ACF-801 data wherever possible because it is now considered more representative.
2.	These percentages are based on "adjusted" numbers of families and children unless otherwise indicated. These "adjusted" numbers represent the number funded through CCDF only. The "adjusted" number is the raw or "unadjusted" number reported by the State
3.	A "0%" indication often means the value is less than 0.5% rather than actually zero. In a few instances, the sum of the categories may not appear to add up to exactly 100% because of rounding.
4.	At the time of publication, American Samoa and Guam had not yet reported ACF-801 data for FFY 2005. The Northern Mariana Islands submitted nine (9) months of ACF-801 data.
5.	For children served by multiple providers, the child's count is proportioned based on the ratio of the hours with each provider divided by the total hours of service.
6.	For consistency with related reports involving setting data, the Invalid/Not Reported category includes children with any element of any setting identified as invalid or not reported including zero hours served, zero cost, or no setting records.
7.	The current WY processing system is unable to extract a number of hours for full- and part-day authorizations resulting in a high percentage of invalid setting records. WY is developing a completely new processing system that will correct this problem in the future.