FFY 2006 CCDF Data Tables (Preliminary Estimates)
Index: 1-Average Monthly Families and Children Served | 2-Percent of Children Served by Payment Method | 3-Percent of Children Served by Types of Care | 4-Percent of Children Served in Regulated Settings vs.Settings Legally Operating without Regulation | 5-Percent Served by Relatives vs. Non-Relatives | 6-Percent of Children Served in All Types of Care | 7-Number of Child Care Providers Receiving CCDF Funds | 8-Methods of Consumer Education Summary | 9-Children Served by Age Group | 10-Children Served by Reason for Care | 11-Children by Racial Group | 12-Children by Latino Ethnicity | 13-Care by Age Category and Type of Care | 14-Care By Age Group and Care Type | 15-Expenditures By Age Group and Care Type | 16-TANF as a Source of Income | 17-Co-payment as a Percent of Family IncomeThe entire collection of tables is also available in Excel or PDF format.
| Table 1 Child Care and Development Fund Preliminary Estimates Average Monthly Adjusted Number of Families and Children Served (FFY 2006) |
||
|---|---|---|
| States/Territories | Average Number of Families |
Average Number of Children |
| Alabama | 14,700 | 28,000 |
| Alaska | 2,900 | 4,900 |
| American Samoa | - | - |
| Arizona | 18,500 | 30,900 |
| Arkansas | 3,900 | 5,600 |
| California | 117,000 | 184,100 |
| Colorado | 8,900 | 16,300 |
| Connecticut | 6,300 | 10,100 |
| Delaware | 4,600 | 7,500 |
| District of Columbia | 2,500 | 3,600 |
| Florida | 67,900 | 108,600 |
| Georgia | 35,600 | 64,600 |
| Guam | 400 | 600 |
| Hawaii | 5,600 | 8,600 |
| Idaho | 5,400 | 9,900 |
| Illinois | 44,500 | 82,200 |
| Indiana | 17,300 | 32,800 |
| Iowa | 11,100 | 19,400 |
| Kansas | 12,000 | 22,400 |
| Kentucky | 20,700 | 37,000 |
| Louisiana | 23,200 | 39,100 |
| Maine | 3,700 | 5,400 |
| Maryland | 13,500 | 22,900 |
| Massachusetts | 23,900 | 32,100 |
| Michigan | 45,000 | 87,800 |
| Minnesota | 19,400 | 35,100 |
| Mississippi | 19,500 | 39,100 |
| Missouri | 19,200 | 33,600 |
| Montana | 2,900 | 4,800 |
| Nebraska | 7,400 | 13,100 |
| Nevada | 3,600 | 6,000 |
| New Hampshire | 5,200 | 7,500 |
| New Jersey | 25,900 | 37,900 |
| New Mexico | 11,600 | 19,800 |
| New York | 73,200 | 123,700 |
| North Carolina | 47,100 | 95,800 |
| North Dakota | 2,500 | 4,000 |
| Northern Mariana Islands | 200 | 400 |
| Ohio | 28,800 | 50,400 |
| Oklahoma | - | - |
| Oregon | 11,000 | 20,200 |
| Pennsylvania | 49,500 | 86,700 |
| Puerto Rico | 7,800 | 10,700 |
| Rhode Island | 4,400 | 7,100 |
| South Carolina | 11,300 | 19,700 |
| South Dakota | 3,100 | 4,900 |
| Tennessee | 22,200 | 42,500 |
| Texas | 68,200 | 126,200 |
| Utah | 7,000 | 13,000 |
| Vermont | 4,700 | 6,800 |
| Virgin Islands | 400 | 700 |
| Virginia | 17,200 | 27,900 |
| Washington | 32,700 | 53,200 |
| West Virginia | 5,600 | 9,300 |
| Wisconsin | 17,100 | 30,100 |
| Wyoming | 2,900 | 4,700 |
| National Total | 1,040,700 | 1,799,300 |
| Notes applicable to this table: | |
| 1. | The source for this table is ACF-801 data for FFY 2006. |
| 2. | All counts are "adjusted" numbers of families and children unless otherwise indicated. These "adjusted" numbers represent the number funded through CCDF only. The "adjusted" number is the raw or "unadjusted" number reported by the State multiplied by the pooling factor as reported on the ACF-800. A few States have indicated that the pooling factor reported on the ACF-800 is not applicable to the ACF-801. This report takes all these factors into consideration in calculating the "adjusted" numbers or percentages. |
| 3. | All States provide an actual unadjusted count of families served each month. For States reporting full population data, the number of child records reported each month were directly counted. However, for States that only submit samples, the ratio of children-to-families was determined each month from the samples and then multiplied by the reported number of families to obtain an estimate of the unadjusted number of children served each month. The unadjusted average number of families and children were obtained from the monthly numbers in the Federal Fiscal Year (FFY). |
| 4. | At the time this data was prepared, American Samoa had not yet reported ACF-801 data for FFY 2006 and Guam only submitted four (4) months of data. Oklahoma had not submitted the ACF-800 form or otherwise reported the pooling factor and had not reported all the ACF-801 data, so OK was not included in this data. After this data was prepared, Minnesota reported that the number of families and children served as reported above is approximately 31% overstated. The final publication of this data will include corrected MN data results. |
| 5. | Connecticut does not report ACF-801 data on all or nearly all children served by contracted centers. Alaska's reported population does not accurately reflect the population served in Oct 2005 through January 2006 served by CCDF due to sampling difficulties. However, Alaska began reporting full population data in Feb 2006. Alaska does not report any children in foster care or families headed by a child. |
| 6. | The reported results shown above have been rounded to the nearest 100. The national numbers are simply the sum of the State and Territory numbers. |
