FFY1999 CCDF Data Tables and Charts |
| Index:
Cover page | List of
Tables and Charts | 1-Children Served
| 2-Type of Payment | 3-Care
by Type | 4-Regulated vs. Non-Regulated
| 5-Relative Care | 6-Setting Detail
| 7-Provider Summary | 8-Consumer
Education | Reason for Care Chart
| Ages Chart
Entire collection of tables and charts is available as a
single MS Word document. |
| Related Item: FFY1998 CCDF Data Tables and Charts |
Child
Care and Development Fund
|
| States/ Territories |
Licensed or
Regulated Providers
|
Providers Legally
Operating without Regulation
|
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Child's Home
|
Family Home
|
Group Home
|
Center |
Child's Home |
Family Home |
Group Home |
Center |
||||
|
Relative |
Non-Relative
|
Relative |
Non-Relative
|
Relative |
Non-Relative
|
||||||
| Alabama |
-
|
9%
|
6%
|
59%
|
-
|
-
|
9%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
17%
|
| Alaska |
-
|
11%
|
2%
|
42%
|
1%
|
3%
|
11%
|
29%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| American Samoa |
-
|
-
|
-
|
100%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Arizona |
-
|
10%
|
4%
|
74%
|
2%
|
-
|
10%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Arkansas |
1%
|
18%
|
-
|
80%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| California |
-
|
9%
|
5%
|
70%
|
2%
|
1%
|
8%
|
4%
|
-
|
-
|
1%
|
| Colorado |
-
|
20%
|
-
|
56%
|
2%
|
8%
|
8%
|
6%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Connecticut |
-
|
6%
|
-
|
39%
|
39%
|
15%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1%
|
| Delaware |
-
|
34%
|
2%
|
47%
|
4%
|
-
|
5%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
8%
|
| District of Columbia |
-
|
4%
|
-
|
94%
|
-
|
-
|
1%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Florida |
-
|
9%
|
-
|
79%
|
-
|
1%
|
2%
|
2%
|
-
|
-
|
6%
|
| Georgia |
-
|
9%
|
2%
|
78%
|
-
|
2%
|
3%
|
7%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Guam |
-
|
-
|
1%
|
36%
|
18%
|
-
|
-
|
42%
|
-
|
-
|
3%
|
| Hawaii |
-
|
7%
|
-
|
17%
|
5%
|
5%
|
52%
|
11%
|
-
|
-
|
4%
|
| Idaho |
-
|
-
|
15%
|
45%
|
1%
|
1%
|
19%
|
20%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Illinois |
-
|
12%
|
1%
|
28%
|
11%
|
21%
|
22%
|
3%
|
-
|
-
|
2%
|
| Indiana |
-
|
17%
|
-
|
26%
|
4%
|
3%
|
17%
|
24%
|
-
|
-
|
8%
|
| Iowa |
-
|
25%
|
12%
|
36%
|
1%
|
1%
|
8%
|
18%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Kansas |
-
|
8%
|
42%
|
36%
|
3%
|
4%
|
7%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Kentucky |
-
|
4%
|
1%
|
64%
|
2%
|
1%
|
13%
|
15%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Louisiana |
-
|
-
|
-
|
51%
|
18%
|
14%
|
2%
|
15%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Maine |
-
|
18%
|
-
|
23%
|
-
|
-
|
1%
|
3%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Maryland |
-
|
31%
|
-
|
35%
|
16%
|
7%
|
12%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Massachusetts |
-
|
6%
|
18%
|
57%
|
6%
|
10%
|
4%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Michigan |
-
|
8%
|
8%
|
14%
|
16%
|
15%
|
39%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Minnesota |
-
|
39%
|
-
|
28%
|
7%
|
3%
|
9%
|
12%
|
-
|
-
|
3%
|
| Mississippi |
-
|
-
|
2%
|
80%
|
6%
|
2%
|
6%
|
5%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Missouri |
-
|
13%
|
1%
|
33%
|
-
|
-
|
24%
|
24%
|
-
|
-
|
4%
|
| Montana |
-
|
21%
|
33%
|
32%
|
-
|
-
|
1%
|
12%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Nebraska |
-
|
35%
|
7%
|
57%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Nevada |
-
|
4%
|
-
|
69%
|
2%
|
-
|
2%
|
6%
|
-
|
-
|
16%
|
| New Hampshire |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| New Jersey |
-
|
11%
|
-
|
74%
|
1%
|
-
|
4%
|
10%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| New Mexico |
-
|
2%
|
4%
|
40% -
|
-
|
-
|
40%
|
13%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| New York |
-
|
12%
|
6%
|
33%
|
7%
|
8%
|
12%
|
20%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| North Carolina |
-
|
12%
|
1%
|
82%
|
-
|
-
|
3%
|
1%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| North Dakota |
-
|
43%
|
27%
|
29%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Northern Mariana Islands |
-
|
71%
|
-
|
29%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Ohio |
-
|
35%
|
1%
|
64%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Oklahoma |
-
|
18%
|
-
|
81%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Oregon |
-
|
21%
|
1%
|
17%
|
5%
|
9%
|
13%
|
30%
|
-
|
-
|
5%
|
| Pennsylvania |
-
|
8%
|
3%
|
54%
|
2%
|
4%
|
6%
|
23%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Puerto Rico |
-
|
3%
|
9%
|
50%
|
2%
|
2%
|
19%
|
15%
|
-
|
1%
|
-
|
| Rhode Island |
-
|
4%
|
-
|
63%
|
3%
|
6%
|
23%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| South Carolina |
-
|
5%
|
3%
|
77%
|
-
|
3%
|
-
|
11%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| South Dakota |
-
|
41%
|
8%
|
30%
|
3%
|
2%
|
13%
|
4%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Tennessee |
-
|
7%
|
5%
|
73%
|
1%
|
-
|
2%
|
12%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Texas |
-
|
3%
|
3%
|
78%
|
7%
|
-
|
9%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Utah |
-
|
9%
|
4%
|
37%
|
1%
|
1%
|
16%
|
31%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Vermont |
-
|
46%
|
-
|
41%
|
2%
|
2%
|
4%
|
5%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Virgin Islands |
-
|
-
|
14%
|
54%
|
3%
|
1%
|
11%
|
9%
|
-
|
-
|
9%
|
| Virginia |
-
|
26%
|
-
|
54%
|
1%
|
-
|
14%
|
4%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Washington |
-
|
24%
|
-
|
40%
|
12%
|
12%
|
12%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| West Virginia |
-
|
46%
|
1%
|
41%
|
-
|
-
|
11%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1%
|
| Wisconsin |
-
|
36%
|
-
|
64%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Wyoming |
-
|
10%
|
15%
|
31%
|
9%
|
5%
|
15%
|
16%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| National Average |
-
|
13%
|
4%
|
55%
|
5%
|
5%
|
10%
|
7%
|
-
|
-
|
1%
|
Notes:
- New Hampshire did not report number of children by setting type.
- Maine and Montana submitted data but the number of children by setting type did not add up to the total number of children listed for their states.
- Totals may not add up because of rounding errors.
- The source for this table is ACF-800 data from FFY1999.
 |
| Index: Cover page | List of Tables and Charts | 1-Children Served | 2-Type of Payment | 3-Care by Type | 4-Regulated vs. Non-Regulated | 5-Relative Care | 6-Setting Detail | 7-Provider Summary | 8-Consumer Education | Reason for Care Chart | Ages Chart |
| Related Item: FFY1998 CCDF Data Tables and Charts |