Child Care Bureau: Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF), Revised FFY 1999 CCDF Data Tables and Charts

The entire collection of tables and charts is available in Excel document.

Child Care and Development Fund
Percent of Children Served in Regulated Settings vs. Settings Legally Operating Without Regulation (FFY 1999)

Table 4

State	Licensed / Regulated	Legally Operating Without Regulation
Alabama	74%	26%
Alaska	55%	45%
American Samoa	100%	0%
Arizona	88%	12%
Arkansas	100%	0%
California	84%	16%
Colorado	76%	24%
Connecticut	46%	54%
Delaware	83%	17%
District of Columbia	99%	1%
Florida	88%	12%
Georgia	88%	12%
Guam	37%	63%
Hawaii	24%	76%
Idaho	59%	41%
Illinois	40%	60%
Indiana	44%	56%
Iowa	73%	27%
Kansas	86%	14%
Kentucky	69%	31%
Louisiana	51%	49%
Maine	41%	5%
Maryland	65%	35%
Massachusetts	81%	19%
Michigan	30%	70%
Minnesota	67%	33%
Mississippi	82%	18%
Missouri	48%	52%
Montana	87%	14%
Nebraska	100%	0%
Nevada	74%	26%
New Hampshire	-	-
New Jersey	85%	15%
New Mexico	46%	54%
New York	52%	48%
North Carolina	95%	5%
North Dakota	100%	0%
Northern Mariana Islands	100%	0%
Ohio	100%	0%
Oklahoma	100%	0%
Oregon	38%	62%
Pennsylvania	65%	35%
Puerto Rico	62%	38%
Rhode Island	68%	32%
South Carolina	85%	15%
South Dakota	78%	22%
Tennessee	85%	15%
Texas	84%	16%
Utah	50%	50%
Vermont	87%	13%
Virgin Islands	68%	32%
Virginia	81%	19%
Washington	64%	36%
West Virginia	87%	13%
Wisconsin	100%	0%
Wyoming	55%	45%
National	73%	27%

Notes:

1.	The source for this table is ACF-800 data for FFY 1999.
2.	New Hampshire did not report the number of children by setting type.
3.	Maine submitted data, but the total number of children by setting type did not add up to the total number of children.
4.	A "0%" indication often means the value is less than 0.5% rather than actually zero.
5.	In a few instances, the sum of the categories may not appear to add up to exactly 100% because of rounding.