Child Care Bureau: Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF), Revised FFY 1999 CCDF Data Tables and Charts

Revised FFY 1999 CCDF Data Tables and Charts

The entire collection of tables and charts is available in Excel document.

Child Care and Development Fund
Of Children Served in Settings Legally Operating Without Regulation, Percent Served by Relatives vs. Non-Relatives (FFY 1999)

Table 5

State	Relative	Non-Relative
Alabama	34%	66%
Alaska	29%	72%
American Samoa	-	-
Arizona	100%	0%
Arkansas	0%	100%
California	62%	39%
Colorado	43%	57%
Connecticut	72%	28%
Delaware	49%	51%
District of Columbia	74%	26%
Florida	17%	83%
Georgia	24%	76%
Guam	29%	71%
Hawaii	75%	25%
Idaho	47%	53%
Illinois	56%	44%
Indiana	37%	63%
Iowa	31%	69%
Kansas	73%	27%
Kentucky	48%	52%
Louisiana	41%	59%
Maine	38%	62%
Maryland	79%	21%
Massachusetts	49%	51%
Michigan	78%	22%
Minnesota	45%	55%
Mississippi	66%	34%
Missouri	46%	54%
Montana	10%	90%
Nebraska	-	-
Nevada	15%	85%
New Hampshire	-	-
New Jersey	30%	70%
New Mexico	75%	25%
New York	40%	60%
North Carolina	80%	20%
North Dakota	-	-
Northern Mariana Islands	-	-
Ohio	-	-
Oklahoma	-	-
Oregon	29%	71%
Pennsylvania	22%	78%
Puerto Rico	56%	44%
Rhode Island	80%	20%
South Carolina	1%	99%
South Dakota	74%	26%
Tennessee	18%	82%
Texas	100%	0%
Utah	36%	64%
Vermont	43%	57%
Virgin Islands	41%	59%
Virginia	79%	21%
Washington	67%	33%
West Virginia	91%	9%
Wisconsin	-	-
Wyoming	53%	47%
National	52%	48%

Notes:

1.	The source of this table is ACF-800 data for FFY 1999.
2.	American Samoa, Nebraska, North Dakota,Northern Mariana Islands, Ohio, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin did not report having children served in settings legally operating without regulation.
3.	New Hampshire did not report the number of children by setting type.
4.	A "0%" indication often means the value is less than 0.5% rather than actually zero.
5.	In a few instances, the sum of the categories may not appear to add up to exactly 100% because of rounding.