Establishing Partnerships
Partnerships
in Action | Managing
Partnerships![]()
Practical Steps to Forming and Managing Partnerships
Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4Now that you hopefully have a better understanding of the key components and categories of partnerships, where should you begin the process of partnership development? There are four essential steps to making sure you get your partnership off to a successful start.
Step 1: Defining the need for a partnership
Step 2: Starting the process
Step 3: Setting up and maintaining the partnership
Step 4: Implementing evaluation and monitoring
Step One: Defining
the Need for a partnership
The goal in partnerships is to achieve more than individual organizations can achieve on their own. In other words, the whole of the partnership adds more than the sum of the individual parts. Bear in mind that the partnership should not be the end in itself but a means to an end. Therefore, establishing a "partnership" may not always be the appropriate decision.
The following questions provide a checklist to test out whether forming a partnership is the appropriate choice.
|
|
|
Note the benefits and goals below and test with potential partners. Benefits: Goals: |
|
Note your research conducted on potential duplicate partnerships. |
|
Note the outcome of any work carried out to identify potential commitments from partner organizations.
|
|
List the strategy/plan/local priorities the partnership will be supporting here and test these with partners. |
| Once the organizations have agreed to set up a partnership, the terms of the agreement need to be worked out. Theoretical and empirical research suggests three aspects of an ongoing relationship to facilitate cooperation: clarity of obligations, promptness of feedback and the institutionalization of reciprocity. In setting up a partnership, you will want to ensure that these three conditions will be met throughout the partnership. |
|
- Clarity of obligations is
needed so that a cooperative choice can be distinguished from
a defection—referring to the Game Theory rules established
earlier. If the partners are not able to agree on whether a
given action was consistent with their obligations, they are
likely to get into mutual recriminations. Unfortunately, clarity
of obligations competes with the flexibility of implementation.
Until a deep bond of trust develops between the two sides, it
may be better to err on the side of clarity of obligations rather
than flexibility in setting up a partnership.
- Promptness of feedback means
that each side can monitor the behavior of the other so that
any problems can be addressed before they become major grievances.
Promptness of feedback strengthens the future by allowing a
timely response to a perceived problem. Thus, in setting up
the psartnership, the obligations of the two sides should be
chosen so that their performance (or nonperformance) is observable
as quickly as possible.
- The institutionalization of reciprocity can help by specifying in advance what form of review and redress is open if either side has a complaint about the other. What may be needed is some kind of WTO agreement for aid administration14 In the absence of such agreements, even informal norms can help prevent problems from echoing out of control.15
Partnerships
in Action | Managing
Partnerships![]()

