Skip Navigation
acfbanner  
ACF
Department of Health and Human Services 		  
		  Administration for Children and Families
          
ACF Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News   |   HHS Home

  Questions?  |  Privacy  |  Site Index  |  Contact Us  |  Download Reader™Download Reader  |  Print Print      

Office of Community Services skip to primary page contentIncreasing the Capacity of Individuals, Families and Communities

Outcomes Measurement

Performance Indicators | Creating a Plan for Your Outcome Measurement System

Data Collection Methods

Page:  1 | 2 | 3

Validity and Reliability
Validity and reliability are two critical concepts in implementing effective outcome measurement systems. Validity is the accuracy of the information generated. The validity of a data collection instrument is how well it measures what it is supposed to measure. Putting in the time to create good instruments, carefully considering what is being measured and pre-testing the instruments will help increase their validity.

Reliability refers to consistency, or the extent to which data are reproducible. Do items or questions on a survey, for example, repeatedly produce the same response regardless of when the survey is administered or whether the respondents are men or women? Bias in the data collection instrument is a primary threat to reliability and can be reduced by repeated testing and revision of the instrument.

You cannot have a valid instrument if it is not reliable. However, you can have a reliable instrument that is not valid. Think of shooting arrows at a target. Reliability is getting the arrows to land in about the same place each time you shoot. You can do this without hitting the bull’s-eye. Validity is getting the arrow to land on the bull’s-eye. Lots of arrows landing in the bull’s-eye means you have both reliability and validity.

This checklist can help you decide which data collection methods are most appropriate for your outcome measurement.

Checklist for Selecting Data Collection Methods8
Surveys    
       
  1. Do I need data from the perspective of the participant, client, beneficiary or customer?
Yes No  
  1. Do I have a way to get it from these individuals in a systematic way?
Yes No  
  1. Do I need data that are standardized so that statistical comparisons can be made? (For example, will I need to report percents or other statistics?)
Yes No  
  1. Will participants be able to understand the survey questions? (Consider age, cultural backgrounds, etc.)
Yes No  
  1. Do participants have the necessary knowledge or awareness to accurately answer questions about the outcomes?
Yes No  
       
If you have answered YES to questions #1 through 5, surveys may be appropriate for collecting data on your outcomes and indicators.      
Interviews      
       
  1. Are more in-depth answers necessary to adequately measure the indicators or to get information on what is needed or what should change?
Yes No  
  1. Will it be necessary for someone to personally ask participants questions (either on the phone or in person) in order to collect the information related to this outcome? (Consider age, cultural backgrounds, as well as state of mind or receptivity of participants.)
Yes No  
       
If you have answered YES to questions #6 and 7, interviews may be appropriate for collecting data on your outcomes and indicators.      
  Observations      
         
 
  1. Is it difficult to accurately measure the indicators by asking people questions about opinions or perceptions?
Yes No  
 
  1. Can this outcome or indicator be assessed accurately by someone trained to observe it in action — can something actually be observed?
Yes No  
 
  1. Do you have the staff resources for someone to observe events, conditions, interactions or behaviors?
Yes No  
         
  If you have answered YES to questions #8, 9 and 10, observation may be appropriate for collecting data on your outcomes and indicators.      
  Internal Record Review          
         
 
  1. Do you have individualized records, reports, logs or other systematic ways that you track things in your program or services?
Yes No  
 
  1. If an information system exists, are the data consistently entered into it in a timely way?
Yes No  
 
  1. If a system exists, can information be extracted from it easily?
Yes No  
         
  If you have answered YES to questions #11, 12 and 13, internal record review may be appropriate for collecting data on your outcomes and indicators.      
  Official Record Review
   
 
  1. Do official records exist which track the data you need on your outcomes and indicators?

  Yes   No  
 
  1. Are the data accessible to you — will it be possible to get the cooperation of outside agencies or institutions in order to get access to official records?
Yes No  
         
  If you have answered YES to questions #14 and 15, official record review may be appropriate for collecting data on your outcomes and indicators.      

Page:  1 | 2 | 3

Performance Indicators | Creating a Plan for Your Outcome Measurement System