Skip Navigation
acfbanner  
ACF
Department of Health and Human Services 		  
		  Administration for Children and Families
          
ACF Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News   |   HHS Home

  Questions?  |  Privacy  |  Site Index  |  Contact Us  |  Download Reader™Download Reader  |  Print Print      

Office of Community Services skip to primary page contentIncreasing the Capacity of Individuals, Families and Communities

Outcomes Measurement

Logic Models and Program Theory | Data Collection Methods

Performance Indicators

Page:  1 | 2

The next phase in putting together an effective outcome measurement system focuses on deciding how you are going to make your intended outcomes measurable, that is, defining a set of indicators, identifying the data collection methods to gather information about these indicators and organizing your data collection activities into a concrete plan. The sections that follow describe the steps involved in this phase:

  • Step One: Developing good performance indicators

  • Step Two: Determining the appropriate data collection methods

  • Step Three: Creating a feasible outcome measurement plan

As written, outcomes are usually too broad to enable data collection tools to be developed directly from them. Remember, the purpose of outcomes is to describe the intended impact the client organization experiences. For this reason, indicators are used to serve as a bridge between intended outcomes and the actual data collection process. Indicators enable you to determine whether the FBCOs you work with have, in fact, changed in the specific ways that indicate your intended outcome has occurred.

Indicators must be specific and observable. They answer questions like: How will you know when changes have occurred? How will know when you have achieved the outcomes? Thinking ahead to possible data collection methods will tell you if your indicators are specific enough. Ask questions like these to determine whether your indicators will work:

  • How can I see the change? (Through what kind of observation?)

  • How can I hear the change? (Through interviews? Focus groups?)

  • How can I read the change? (Through surveys? In records?)

For example, look at one of the outcomes we discussed in the Outcomes and Outcome Chains section:

Outcome: FBCOs have increased fund development capabilities and opportunities
  • How will you know whether an organization has increased its fund development capabilities? What will you look for? What questions will you ask? When you think about becoming better at fund development, what comes to mind?

  • Similarly, what will you include as a measure for increased fund development opportunities? What is a fund development opportunity? A phone call to a potential donor? A fundraising event? Subscribing to a philanthropy magazine? How will you decide whether the organization is pursuing more fundraising than it used to pursue?

  • Overall, what will you look at to see whether your technical assistance has helped the organization bring in additional funds through their fund development efforts?

In order to serve effectively as a bridge to data collection, indicators must be specific items of information that describe observable, measurable characteristics or changes in corresponding outcomes. Indicators must be measures that can be seen, heard, counted, reported or enumerated using some type of data collection method.

Page:  1 | 2

Logic Models and Program Theory | Data Collection Methods