Skip ACF banner and navigation
Department of Health and Human Services logo
Questions?
Privacy
Site Index
Contact Us
 Home| Services|Working with ACF|Policy/Planning|About ACF|ACF News Search
Administration for Children and Families US Department of Health and Human Services
The Office of Child Support EnforcementGiving Hope and Support to America's Children

Chapter 2. Colorado

Compendium Update - November 2000

In this chapter

Caseload Management Training

Goal

Meet statewide performance goals in the program's strategic plan by providing each county with training on systems generated reports. Reduce excessive "deadwood" in the caseload. Ensure cases move through the system efficiently to comply with findings of a legislative audit.

Description

In November and December 1999 Colorado's Division of Child Support Enforcement (DCSE) trained 440 county staff to use system-generated reports to manage a caseload. In addition, county staff shared their own "best practices" in using various system-generated reports to better manage their cases. Although county participation was voluntary, 60 of Colorado's 63 counties were represented at one or more of the seven one-day training sessions held throughout the state.

The training focused on training staff to use available systems generated reports. These reports included:

  • The Caseload Listing Report, at the team and technician (tech.) level. At a glance, the tech. can determine the case's next appropriate step (i.e., establishment of paternity and support, location of the NCP, enforcement of the child support order and/or medical support, closure of the case due to emancipation of the child, lack of locate, etc.)

  • A Monthly Monitoring Report which tracks performance on over 50 performance measures for each county. The report is used by the State to evaluate county performance.

  • The OCSE 157.

  • A report which identifies cases with no court order.

  • A report which identifies cases with orders on the system, but no ledger established in accounting

  • A report which identifies cases with judgments, but no arrearage posted on the system.

Proper use of the reports enables workers to move "stagnant" cases by taking the proper action. The goal is always to move "stuck" cases into paying status. Examples:

  • No order established for 90 days? Move the case back to locate for better locate information to permit service of process.

  • No money coming in on a case with an order? Use locate to find an employer. Explore other enforcement actions if no employer can be found.

  • Order on the system, but no ledger in accounting? Establish ledger.

  • Interstate case? Is a request to another state to take action needed?

  • Unworkable case? If case closure criteria are met, close the case.

In addition, the training was designed to help supervisors manage their teams. Besides assisting individual workers to identify problem cases and take action, the system-generated reports can help supervisors to identify overall problems and see where the team needs to focus their efforts.

The training also gave the state the opportunity to explain to county staff the federal performance measures on which the state is now evaluated in order to receive federal incentives.

Results

The training provided a year-end boost to performance, according to DCSE staff. The state achieved its year 2000 goal of collecting $200,000,000 by the end of 1999 - a year ahead of schedule. In addition, the state achieved its performance measures for the year overall. While a number of factors contributed to this outcome, a marked improvement was noted on a number of factors between October (before the training) and the end of the year.

The biggest benefit: Instilling the mindset "You always need to be aware of your caseload. Be sure that it is a workable caseload and one you can manage."

Location

Seven training sessions were provided in six sites throughout the state of Colorado. All counties in the state were eligible to send staff to the training. The training was developed by Colorado DCSE.

Funding

Regular IV-D funds were used for the training project. There was a cost of $3,039 for reserving meeting sites, refreshments, and equipment. This did not include the travel expenditures for the three trainers from DCSE. Each county covered time and travel cost of its own staff attending the training.

Replication Advice

Be sure to cover both systems and policy issues - and involve both systems and policy staff in planning and delivering the training," says Diane Young, the DCSE Policy Specialist who managed the caseload management training project. "The systems person was able to explain where the data came from, for example," says Young.

"This kind of training can be used to impress upon staff how their individual working of the cases impacts the whole - in particular, the state's ability to draw down federal dollars," she says.

Contact

Diane Young, Policy Specialist, Colorado Division of Child Support Enforcement, 303 East 17th Avenue, Suite 200, Denver, Colorado 80203, phone 720-947-5088, fax 720-947-5006, e-mail: <diane.young@state.co.us>.

Strategic Plan (Colorado Child Support Enforcement Task Force)

Goal

Improve Colorado State (county administered) child support program: enlist each county to do its fair share to meet statewide goals, comply with federal requirements, and attain maximum federal incentive payments for the State child support program.

Description

Since 1988, Colorado has used strategic planning as a tool to enable the state and counties to work together to set and meet goals for the Colorado child support program. Last year Colorado achieved its collection goal of $200,000,000 a year ahead of schedule - meeting the goal for the year 2000 in 1999. This is up from collections of $38,000,000 in 1988 - the year the state began using the process.

The emphasis of the strategic planning process has been on excellent communications between state and county partners, technical assistance where needed, joint planning and each county doing its fair share to meet statewide goals. County representatives participate in the planning process. Counties also receive regular reports on how they are doing in meeting their own goals and in comparison with other counties in the state.

In 1987, Irene Ibarra, then Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Social Services, created a Child Support Enforcement Task Force to develop five-year goals and a long-range work plan for Colorado's child support program. Representatives were selected from small, medium, and large counties with all geographical areas represented. In addition, representative state and federal administrators, judges, and social work supervisors participated in the process.

The task force, which has continued, is divided into subcommittees on various program issues. One was assigned the task of setting program goals, expressed in a long-term strategic plan, and annual goals. This process has continued over the ensuing years, with this group updating goals annually in light of new federal and state requirements, accomplishment of past goals, and changing program priorities. The prior strategic plan covered the years 1992-2001, the current one, 2001-2005.

Key goals for the 1992 -2001 Strategic Plan were 1) to collect $200,000,000 in the year 2000; 2) to reach a paternity establishment percentage of 50 percent; and 3) to improve compliance with federal requirements.

A well-developed process guides the effort:

  • Goals are set for five- to eight-year periods, with annual goals set for each year. If the goal for a particular indicator is 80 percent by 2005, the goal for 2001 may be 53 percent. The goals are attainable, but require a reach if they are to be achieved. Goals are data-based, utilizing extensive data collected about the program and the counties.

  • Counties participate actively in setting goals. Once statewide goals are established, a corresponding goal is established for each county. These are the goals that must be reached on a county basis if the state is to reach its goals.

  • Monthly reports provide feedback to the counties on performance and compliance on fifty plus indicators, including the five federal performance standards. Data is calculated every month and each county receives data on itself. The county can see where it is in relation to its goals and to performance in the rest of the state.

  • On a quarterly basis, the state office compiles a performance report and scores counties on how well they are performing as measured by the set goals and through data in mandatory reports.

  • Annually, counties meet with state officials to discuss what they need from the state to succeed in meeting their goals.

  • Each year, the six lowest performing counties are identified. The state then provides technical assistance to those counties. Their performance is analyzed in depth. The state works with the county to understand the current preformance level and to identify what the county needs to change directions. Currently, three large, two medium and one small county are selected for this process each year. (In 1999 the focus was on larger counties for a year.)

  • The task force updates the goals in the long-term strategic plan each year, based on changes in state and federal law, accomplishment of goals and changing program priorities.

In addition to the county-by-county focus, the state also focuses on particular goals on a statewide basis. For example, the state has established a Paternity Unit which leads the state's efforts on paternity establishment.

This unit works with hospitals, Vital Records, and county offices on the voluntary acknowledgment of paternity process. Training on voluntary acknowledgments is provided to new employees. This office also checks to be sure accurate reports are filed and that the interface with Vital Records is properly utilized. The effort has resulted in a dramatic reduction in the need for litigated paternity establishment. The state's paternity establishment percentage is up from 50 percent to 87 percent since February, 1996.

Results

In 1988, Colorado collected $38 million in child support; in 1999, $200 million, a year ahead of schedule according to the strategic plan. In May of 1992, the state's Paternity Establishment Percentage was 34.9%; in May 2000 it was 83.1%. In 1992, 48 percent of the caseload had orders; in 2000, there were orders in 75.6 percent of Colorado's cases.

Location

Statewide in Colorado. The program was developed by Colorado. It has been adopted by other state programs in Colorado as an exemplary approach to program improvement.

Funding

Regular IV-D funds.

Replication Advice

"The key message," says Darius Sams, who heads the Policy and Evaluation Section of Colorado's DCSE, is: "It works! Very open communication is a key piece of the process - that and respect. I respect the front line workers immensely. They respect the state's ability to keep the program moving in the direction it is required to move. This is not a 'we/they' thing, it has to be 'us.'"

"You have to put all the cards on the table. You have to storm through the issues that are raised. You have to establish good norms for working together. You have to develop a real partnership."

Contact

Darius Sams, Section Chief, Policy and Evaluation Section, Division of Child Support Enforcement, Colorado Department of Human Services, 303 E. 17th Avenue, Suite 200, Denver CO 80203-1241, phone 720-947-5070, fax 720-947-5006, <e-mail: darius.sams@state.co.us.>


Download FREE Adobe Acrobat® Reader™ to view PDF files located on this site.

OCSE Home | Press Room | Events Calendar | Publications | State Links | OCSE Search
Site Map | FAQs | Contact Information
Systems: FPLS | FIDM | State and Tribal | State Profiles
Resources: Grants Information | Información en Español | International | NECSRS | Tribal | Virtual Trainer's Library