|
|
Giving Hope and Support to America's Children
Table 14: COST EFFECTIVENESS RATIOS, FY 2001
Data Preview Report - September 2002
| Table 14 |
| COST EFFECTIVENESS RATIOS, FY 2001 |
| STATES | CSPIA* | Traditional |
| ALABAMA | $4.01 | $3.69 |
| ALASKA | 4.14 | 3.53 |
| ARIZONA | 4.12 | 3.63 |
| ARKANSAS | 2.83 | 2.57 |
| CALIFORNIA | 2.61 | 2.46 |
| COLORADO | 3.58 | 3.12 |
| CONNECTICUT | 3.86 | 3.57 |
| DELAWARE | 2.93 | 2.46 |
| DIST. OF COL. | 2.26 | 1.90 |
| FLORIDA | 3.60 | 3.16 |
| GEORGIA | 3.96 | 3.52 |
| GUAM | 1.33 | 1.22 |
| HAWAII | 6.16 | 5.84 |
| IDAHO | 4.62 | 4.05 |
| ILLINOIS | 2.50 | 2.36 |
| INDIANA | 6.34 | 6.04 |
| IOWA | 5.27 | 5.00 |
| KANSAS | 2.51 | 2.30 |
| KENTUCKY | 4.08 | 3.87 |
| LOUISIANA | 4.38 | 4.11 |
| MAINE | 6.01 | 5.71 |
| MARYLAND | 4.22 | 3.94 |
| MASSACHUSETTS | 5.14 | 4.89 |
| MICHIGAN | 4.82 | 4.77 |
| MINNESOTA | 4.13 | 4.00 |
| MISSISSIPPI | 5.96 | 5.62 |
| MISSOURI | 3.81 | 3.62 |
| MONTANA | 3.91 | 3.32 |
| NEBRASKA | 3.35 | 3.29 |
| NEVADA | 3.24 | 2.53 |
| NEW HAMPSHIRE | 5.40 | 4.99 |
| NEW JERSEY | 5.27 | 4.97 |
| NEW MEXICO | 1.07 | 0.96 |
| NEW YORK | 5.07 | 4.76 |
| NORTH CAROLINA | 4.04 | 3.71 |
| NORTH DAKOTA | 4.19 | 3.93 |
| OHIO | 4.23 | 4.07 |
| OKLAHOMA | 2.90 | 2.60 |
| OREGON | 6.63 | 6.04 |
| PENNSYLVANIA | 6.98 | 6.78 |
| PUERTO RICO | 5.51 | 5.32 |
| RHODE ISLAND | 4.23 | 3.94 |
| SOUTH CAROLINA | 4.60 | 4.35 |
| SOUTH DAKOTA | 7.72 | 6.91 |
| TENNESSEE | 4.99 | 4.61 |
| TEXAS | 5.23 | 4.92 |
| UTAH | 3.69 | 3.41 |
| VERMONT | 3.90 | 3.65 |
| VIRGIN ISLANDS | 1.12 | 0.96 |
| VIRGINIA | 6.12 | 5.49 |
| WASHINGTON | 4.55 | 4.27 |
| WEST VIRGINIA | 4.64 | 4.32 |
| WISCONSIN | 6.06 | 5.87 |
| WYOMING | 4.09 | 3.72 |
| TOTALS | $4.18 | $3.92 |
| Source: The CSPIA formula equals, forms OCSE-34A, lines 5 + 8 +13 / OCSE-396A line 9 (A+C) - 1b (A+C). |
| The traditional formula equals, forms OCSE-34A line 8 / OCSE-396A, line 9 (A+C). |
| *This is the ratio that will be used under the Child Support Performance and Incentive Act of 1998 (CSPIA). |
| Note: No assumption is made regarding data reliability. |
|