MISSOURI
SORT CASES TO IMPROVE COLLECTIONS
Goals:
- Improve child support collections
- Improve efficiencies/better use of resources
- Increase collections and percentage of paying cases
- Improve in Federal performance measures
- Improve data/case integrity
- Improve outcomes/results for customers
- Improve morale for staff
Description:
Missouri's Family Support Division implemented a new
approach to the enforcement of child support and medical support
obligations. Previously, cases were divided into individual
caseloads by alphabetic split. Under the new structure, cases are
split into categories based upon the noncustodial parent's
circumstance. Rather than individual caseloads, the cases in each
category area are worked by a team of individuals. The four
categories include:
- Category 1 - NCP not paying, no enforcement remedies
exist (i.e., NCP is receiving SSI or TANF benefits, he/she is
incarcerated with no resources, both administrative and judicial
remedies have been exhausted, the NCP cannot be located, etc. These
cases are monitored for changes in circumstances and/or location of
NCP or NCP resources. Once enforcement action can be taken, the
case moves to category 2.
- Category 2 - NCP not paying, enforcement remedies exist (i.e.,
the agency has taken enforcement action, however, the case has not
paid for three consecutive months so it does not yet meet the
criteria for Category 4; or the case has an enforcement remedy
available that has not yet been completed.
- Category 3 - NCP resides in another State and interstate
referral is/should be completed.
- Category 4 - NCP paying for a minimum of three consecutive
months.
Missouri's Automated Child Support System (MACSS)
automatically assigns cases to a particular category based upon the
specific criteria. Work activities for each category are generated
to the appropriate category team via system alerts, auto-generated
forms and category reports.
When a case meets the criteria for a specific category, MACSS
automatically moves the cases to the category without worker
intervention.
Results:
- The new approach was piloted in four of Missouri's child
support offices for six months between January and June of 2006.
Pilot results showed an overall average of 10 percent increase in
productivity (enforcement actions taken) and a 7 percent increase
in cases meeting the criteria for, and moving to, Category 4.
- Statewide implementation began in October of 2006 and was
completed in December of 2006. Early data from statewide
implementation is beginning to show the same trend as that of the
pilot.
- Staff report that with the new work activity assignment, and
the narrowed scope of the function they perform, they are able to
accomplish tasks more timely and accurately. They are able to get
to cases that need attention much more quickly, thus obtaining
results the customer anticipates.
Location: Statewide
Funding: No funding needed to implement the structure;
however, Missouri did receive legislative funding to contract call
center services to help support the new structure.
Replication Advice:
- Complete comprehensive outreach to staff prior to change
- Clearly define criteria for each category to allow for as much
automation as possible
- Communicate with partners such as the IV-A program, courts,
prosecuting attorneys, legislators, etc.
- Identify what will be measured early in the process
- Anticipate increased workload in other arenas such as the court
system, interstate referrals, hearings, etc., and anticipate the
increased productivity which may result in higher postage,
noncustodial parent inquiries, backlog on clerical staff, etc.
- Anticipate and deliver refresher training on work activities
specific to each category
Contact:
Alyson Campbell
Email: Alyson.F.Campbell@dss.mo.gov
Phone: 573-522-2106