 |
Giving Hope and Support to America's Children |
" Automated Systems for Child Support Enforcement: A Guide for States "
-
Objective F-2 - Page 64 - Note - "will be review" should read "will be reviewed"
-
Objective F-5 - Page 66 - "42 USE 654B" should read "42 USC 654B"
-
Objective H-4 - Page 75 - "5 CFR 307.10(b)(11)" should read "45 CFR 307.10(b)(11)"
-
Appendix B - Page B-2 - " do no hesitate " should read "do not hesitate "
-
Appendix B - Page B-6 - " in you case " should read "in your case "
-
Appendix B - Page B-15 - "verification that the State is capable of
transmitting interstate child support
collections in the CCD+ and CTX NACHA payment format; "
should read "verification that the State is capable of transmitting interstate
child support
collections in the CCD+ NACHA payment format; "
-
Appendix E - Page E-21 - The answer to the following Question:
Question: We are primarily a judicial state when it comes to establishing orders. Does Objective C-3(g) mean that we must be able to generate an administrative type order from our system? We can support administrative orders entered by other states.
Has changed as follows:Answer: We have revised the Certification guide at Objective C-3(g) to specify that, when State law provides for the administrative establishment of support orders, the system must support the administrative establishment of support orders, including the generation of appropriate documents. However, if State law requires all support orders to be established by a judicial process, the State is not subject to this requirement. The system may, but is not required to generate the administrative type order.
