Search results
- Topics:
- Published Date:
Policy Clarification Relating to Automated Child Support Enforcement Systems
AT-90-11
October 9, 1990Addresses misunderstood areas of automated system projects and clarifies frequently encountered problems
Final Rule: Automatic Data Processing Equipment and Services; Conditions for FFP - 1988
AT-88-01
January 20, 1988Regulations on removing the requirement for prior HHS approval of data processing service agreements
Final Rule: Automatic Data Processing Equipment and Services; Conditions for FFP - 1987
AT-87-02
January 15, 1987Changes requirements for claiming FFP for acquisition of ADP equipment/services in the administration of Title IV programs
FFP for Computer Hardware Acquisitions and Other Provisions of P.L. 98-378
AT-84-14
December 26, 1984Instructions for obtaining 90 percent federal financial participation (FFP) to automate additional system functions
Final Rule: Computerized Support Enforcement Systems
AT-84-07
August 31, 1984Implements the computerized child support enforcement system provisions in section 405 of P. L. 96-265
Final Rule: FFP in the Costs of Cooperative Agreements with Courts and Law Enforcement
AT-82-18
December 18, 1982Expands the availability of FFP in IV-D related court activities
Interim Final Rule: Cost Allocation Plans for Public Assistance Programs
AT-82-05
May 12, 1982Preparation and approval of state agency cost allocation plans used in computing FFP under public assistance programs
Cost Principles for State and Local Governments
AT-81-06
March 9, 1981Circular 74-4 reissued under Circular A-87 - Cost Principles of State and Local Government
Requirements for Receiving Expanded Federal Matching for Court Costs, Revision to AT-80-14
AT-80-17
December 5, 1980Requirements for receiving expanded federal matching for court costs under P.L. 96-265
P.L. 96-265: Use of IRS to Collect Child Support and FFP for Duties Performed by Courts
AT-80-14
August 29, 1980Use of IRS to collect support for non-AFDC families; federal matching for duties performed by court personnel