Improper Payments Information Survey for the TANF Program
State of West Virginia
Instructions |
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, collection of this information has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under OMB Control Number 0970-0290, expiration date 10-31-2008. Submission of this information, however, is voluntary. The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 24 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and reviewing the collection of information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
Please enter the following information for the individual(s) completing this questionnaire and attachments, so we may contact them to clarify information, if necessary.
Date : December 13, 2005
Name: George W. Thomas
Title: Director, DFA Program Review
State Agency: West Virginia Department of Health & Human Resources
(Area Code) Phone Number: (304) 558-8290
E-mail Address: georgethomas@wvdhhr.org
Please return the completed questionnaire and attachments in the enclosed business reply envelope. Alternatively, you may fax your completed questionnaire and brief attachments to the attention of Dennis Poe at 202-205-5887, or preferably email an electronic copy of the questionnaire and any attachments to him at dspoe@acf.hhs.gov.
If you have any questions or comments regarding your submissions, please contact Dennis Poe at 202-401-4053, or at dspoe@acf.hhs.gov.
Please return the questionnaire and attachments by December 30, 2005.
As a point of reference, under the Improper Payments Information Act of 2002, the term, “Improper Payment”
(a) means any payment that should not have been made or that was made in an incorrect amount (including overpayments and underpayments) under statutory, contractual, administrative, or other legally applicable requirements; and
(b) includes any payment to an ineligible recipient, any payment for an ineligible service, any duplicate payment, payments for services not received, and any payment that does not account for applicable discounts.
|
General Overview: Policies and Infrastructure |
1. How does the TANF Lead Agency define improper payments?
The Bureau for Children and Families defines improper payments the same as the Improper Payments Information Act of 2002.
2. Provide a description (electronic copy, if available) of the organizational
structure of the agency in
your State that handles improper payments in the TANF program. If available,
please submit an
organizational chart, or provide the web site address where it can be
found.
The Office of Inspector General is one office responsible for handling Improper Payments.
There mission statement and functions are available on the website below.
The OIG organizational chart is accessible on the hyper link below.
http://www.wvdhhr.org/oig/OIG%20Organizational%20Chart%20-%2010-11-2005.pdf
3. Please check all of the topics or activities listed below for which
your State has policies or regulations
in place for the program. (Please check all that apply.)
x Steps involved in identifying a potential improper payment
x Steps involved in verifying an improper payment
x Establishing claims for improper payments
x Collecting improper payments, including, for example, the authority to reduce payments to recover overpayments
x Distribution of recovered improper payments Follow Federal Regs
x Sources of funding for addressing improper payments Follow Federal Regs
q Other (please specify : )
Identification and Assessment of Improper Payments |
4. Has your State performed an assessment or analysis to determine whether the program is at risk of improper payments?
x Yes.
For which of the following uses of program funds did your state perform an assessment or analysis to determine whether the program is at risk of improper payments? (Please check all that apply.)
x a. Monthly cash assistance payments
x b. “Nonassistance” benefits or services, for example, one-time cash payments designed to divert a family from welfare or payments for car repairs or rental assistance
q c. Other types of benefits and services for families not receiving cash assistance
q d. Payments to service providers
q e. Other (Please specify:) ________________________________________________________
q No.
5. Please describe your process for identifying and handling improper payments.
Information used to identify improper payments comes from many sources.
Fraud Investigators
Worker case reviews
Supervisor Case Reviews
Quality Assurance Reviews
State Data Exchanges
Other State AgenciesChapter 20.3 of the West Virginia Income Maintenance Manual covers the procedures for establishing claims and repayments for TANF cash assistance. Whenever the Assistance Group has received more cash assistance than it was entitled to receive, corrective action is taken by establishing a claim for the overpayment. The establishment, notification and collection of cash assistance claims are the responsibility of the Claims and Collections Unit, Investigations and Fraud Division (IFM). Diversionary Cash Assistance, Emergency Assistance and TANF work participation support payments are not subject to repayment, unless fraud is established. The IFM unit takes information from the Fraud investigators or referrals from WV WORKS field staff. This information may be reported through a referral through the RAPIDS computer benefit system. IFM staff take referrals directly from the computer, cases are referred by caseload and county. The IFM investigator contacts and meets with the client. Economic Service Workers do not discuss or arrange repayment agreements with clients.
6. Which methods, if any, did your state use to identify a total amount of improper payments for the program? (Please check all that apply.)
Calculation based on:
x Findings from the state’s Single Audit
q Other audit findings from state auditors
q Findings from other state or local auditors, including legislative review entities (Please specify :) ______________________________________________________________________________
x Findings from state or local fraud units (Please specify :)
Findings from state or local fraud units are from monthly and annual statistical reports.
x Reviews of service providers and/or contractors
x Reviews of sampled cases, although not statistically representative of all program payments
x Statistically representative sample of payments
q Other (Please specify :) ____________________________________________________________________
7. Does your State calculate an improper payments (including fraudulent payments) rate, that is, a measure of the percentage of total payments that are determined to be improper? (Please check one response and provide the appropriate data.)
x Yes. Please describe the methodology used to arrive at the error rate.
q No
q Information not available.
The Quality Assurance unit conducts reviews to measure the application of various policies which govern eligibility requirements for applicants and recipients of WV Works (TANF) benefits by DHHR staff. A statistically-reliable sample of TANF cases is selected each month. The results of these efforts provide a measure of the integrity in the TANF program. Improper payments in the TANF program are estimated by the ratio of improper payments discovered in the review process to the total payments authorized to the sampled cases.
|
Describing Improper Payments: Sources, Types, Causes |
8. Please rank the following sources of improper payments (1 to 7) for the program in your State over the past two fiscal years, beginning with one (1) indicating the primary source of improper payments. Error is defined as an inadvertent mistake whereas fraud is defined as a willful misrepresentation. (Please rank each source below.)
_2_ Client error
___ Provider error
_1_ Agency error
_3_ Client fraud
___ Provider fraud
___ Agency fraud
___ Other (Please specify)_________________________
9. Of all improper payments in your State, what proportion of those payments would you estimate are overpayments, and what proportion would you estimate are underpayments?
An overpayment is defined as a payment larger than what should have been made/received or any payment that is received when none should have been received.
An underpayment is defined as a payment smaller than what should have been made/received or no payment was received when there should have been one.
Overpayments 88%
Underpayments 12%
10. To what extent, if any, have the following factors contributed to improper payments in your State over the past two fiscal years? (Please check one answer in each row.)
Factors contributing to improper payments |
Great extent |
Moderate extent |
Little extent |
No extent |
Don’t know |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Related to clients |
|||||
a. Nonreporting/underreporting of income |
X |
||||
b. Client receiving payment in more than one jurisdiction |
X |
||||
d. Incorrect reporting of household size |
|
X |
|||
e. Incorrect citizenship or immigration status |
X |
||||
f. Incorrect information on client’s compliance with program requirements, such as participating in required activity |
|
X |
|||
g. Other (Please specify): Assets |
|
X |
|||
Related to providers |
|||||
h. Overstating performance |
|
X |
|||
i. Claiming for services not rendered |
|
X |
|||
j. Other (Please specify): Child Care Provider (FX) receiving benefits e.g., food stamps, etc. and not reporting income from Child Care Payments |
|
|
Prevention of Improper Payments |
11. Please describe your top 3 priorities for preventing and reducing improper payments (e.g., training/meetings for providers on rules and responsibilities; training for agency staff on correct implementation of rules and responsibilities; clear communication with parents on rules and responsibilities; use of information technology.)
1) Payment Accuracy meetings are held at local, regional and state-wide levels to focus on increasing the quality of training on error-prone items.
2) Continue to improve the quality and number of data exchanges available to Workers to verify information. Continued improvements planned for our benefit issuance computer system.
3) Increasing client education concerning what are appropriate timeframes for reporting and the information that must be reported.
12. For each activity listed below, indicate whether or not your State performs it to verify the accuracy of information needed to determine eligibility for and/or proper amount of a program payment. If yes, indicate when in the process the step or activity is performed and how often it is performed.
Steps or activities performed |
Is the step/activity performed? |
If yes, at what stage in the process (e.g., pre-approval/approval; redetermination at 3 mos., 6 mos. or 12 mos. ;etc.)? |
If yes, how often? |
Please insert a checkmark by the 3 items you consider the most effective. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
a. Require documentation from client |
x Yes q No |
At application, reviews and when changes are reported. |
6-12 Months |
|
b. Fingerprint clients |
q Yes x No |
1 |
||
c. Access online databases |
x Yes q No |
When system alerts are received. And at application, review and when changes are reported |
Check alerts daily, review at report of change or review |
x |
d. Match automated computer files |
x Yes q No |
When system alerts are received. And at application, review and when changes are reported |
Check alerts daily, review at report of change or review |
x |
e. Conduct telephone, fax, or email contacts |
x Yes q No |
When client needs help providing verification |
As necessary |
|
f. Conduct home visits |
x Yes q No |
At application, at least yearly and when sanctions are imposed |
At least yearly |
|
g. Initiate a fraud investigation if warranted |
x Yes q No |
When referrals are made |
As necessary |
|
h.
Conduct program integrity/quality control |
x Yes q No |
Randomly selected cases by QA, Case reviews and application reviews by district supervisors |
Monthly at district level & State QA reviews randomly selected cases from across the State |
x |
i. Other (Please specify :) |
q Yes q No |
13. Data sharing is a method used to obtain and disclose information about individuals from within your agency, from other agencies and/or from independent, third party sources, including federal and State agencies or private companies. These activities can be conducted before an initial payment is made to an individual or provider (pre-payment) and also after payment is made (post-payment) to verify eligibility and payment accuracy. For each source listed below:
Indicate whether or not your agency or State utilizes this data source to better ensure accurate payments under the program. If your State utilizes the source, indicate when in the process the source is used (before the payment is issued or at some point after the payment is issued), and/or indicate how often that source is used. (Please check all appropriate responses for each row.)
Data source |
Is the source used? |
If yes, when in the process (e.g., pre-approval/approval; redetermination at 3 mos., 6 mos. or 12 mos. ;etc.)? |
If yes, how often? |
Please insert a checkmark by the 3 items you consider the most effective. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
a. Income Eligibility Verification System (IEVS) |
x Yes q No |
At approval, redeterminations and when alerts appear through data exhanges |
6 mo/ 12 mo rev & recerts. Daily system alerts |
|
b. Other human services programs in your agency/State |
x Yes q No |
When reported |
As received |
|
c. State department of labor or employment security |
x Yes q No |
At approval, redeterminations and when alerts appear through data exhanges |
6 mo/ 12 mo rev & recerts. Daily system alerts |
|
d. State directory of new hires |
x Yes q No |
At approval, redeterminations and when alerts appear through data exhanges |
6 mo/ 12 mo rev & recerts. Daily system alerts |
|
e. State department of motor vehicles |
x Yes q No |
At approval, redeterminations and when alerts appear through data exhanges |
6 mo/ 12 mo rev & recerts. Daily system alerts |
x |
f. Public Assistance Reporting Information System (PARIS) |
x Yes q No |
Information has been matched with PA and MD, |
Currently in infancy |
|
g. State data (from other States) on length of TANF receipt |
x Yes q No |
No date exchange, but the Worker contacts other states |
At application |
|
h. State data (from other States) on potential concurrent TANF receipt |
x Yes q No |
No date exchange, but the Worker contacts other states |
At application |
|
i. State data (from other States) on client or provider debarment from benefits, for fraud or other infraction |
x Yes q No |
Received system’s alerts on IPVs |
Daily |
|
j. Lottery agencies |
x Yes q No |
Workers review lottery reports |
when published |
|
k. Prisons and criminal justice agencies at State level |
x Yes q No |
At approval, redeterminations and when alerts appear through data exhanges 6 mo/ 12 mo rev & recerts. Daily alerts |
6 mo/ 12 mo rev & recerts. Daily alerts |
|
l. National Criminal Information Center (NCIC) |
q Yes x No |
|
|
|
m. Local jails |
q Yes x No |
|
|
|
n. Credit bureaus |
q Yes x No |
|
|
|
o. Financial institutions |
q Yes x No |
|
|
|
p. State tax intercepts |
q Yes x No |
|
|
|
q. Immigration authorities |
x Yes q No |
At approval, redeterminations and when alerts appear through data exhanges 6 mo/ 12 mo rev & recerts. Daily alerts |
6 mo/ 12 mo rev & recerts. Daily alerts |
|
r. K-12 school systems |
q Yes x No |
Although Workers contact local schools |
Whenever needed |
|
s. Community colleges |
q Yes x No |
Although Workers contact local schools |
Whenever needed |
|
t. Other providers of services, education, training |
q Yes x No |
Although Workers contact local schools |
Whenever needed |
|
u. Child support |
x Yes q No |
At approval, redeterminations and when alerts appear through data exhanges 6 mo/ 12 mo rev & recerts. Daily alerts |
6 mo/ 12 mo rev & recerts. Daily alerts |
x |
v. Social Security Administration (SSA) form W-2 (wage statements) |
x Yes q No |
At approval, redeterminations and when alerts appear through data exhanges 6 mo/ 12 mo rev & recerts. Daily alerts |
6 mo/ 12 mo rev & recerts. Daily alerts |
x |
w. SSA Social Security number verification |
x Yes q No |
Through daily system alerts |
When generat |
|
x. SSA Supplemental Security Income (SSI) data |
x Yes q No |
Through daily system alerts |
When generat |
|
Recovery of Improper Payments |
14. For the most recently completed fiscal years, how much in program improper payments has your agency, or another agency within your State, recovered? (Please indicate your responses in the space provided below.)
Most recently completed fiscal year $360,802.00 (Specify ending month/ year) 09/05
x Includes fraudulent improper payments
Next most recently completed fiscal year $493,950.00 (Specify ending month/ year) 09/04
x Includes fraudulent improper payments
q Not tracked
15. What penalties does your program mandate for clients, agencies, or providers, who commit an error leading to improper payments? Civil Penalties/Disqualifications
A. Agency: Outside agencies may lose contracts with DHHR and/or be required to repay identified improper benefit payments, if they do not report changes and information correctly.
B. Clients/Parents: If a TANF recipient intentionally does not report information, their case may be sanctioned, benefits reduced, and possibly be required to repay identified improper benefit payments.
C. Providers: Providers may lose contracts with the agency and/or be required to repay identified improper benefit payments, if errors reported lead to improper payments
D. County/Local Agency: Nothing
|
Fraud: Intentional Overpayments |
16. How does the TANF Lead Agency define “fraud”?
For TANF, benefits are obtained fraudulently when a person obtains or attempts to obtain, or aids or abets an applicant or recipient to obtain or attempt to obtain benefits for which they are ineligible, by means of a willfully false statements or misrepresentations.
17. Does your agency maintain data on fraudulent payments in the program as a subset of your improper payments data? (Please check one response.)
q X Yes
If yes, please list the methods you use for finding occurrences of fraud and indicate whether you would rate each method as very effective, somewhat effective, somewhat ineffective, or very ineffective.
Fraud Investigators - very effective
Worker case reviews - very effective
Supervisor Case Reviews – very effective
Quality Assurance Reviews - effective
State Date Exchanges - effective
Other State Agencies - somewhat effective
q No
Does any other entity in your State maintain this information, such as a State fraud unit or Inspector General? If yes, please provide us with a contact name and phone number:
The Office of the Inspector General,
Mary M. Jordan, Inspector General
Building 6, State Capitol Complex, Room 817-B
Charleston, WV 25305
Ph. 304-558-2278
18. What steps, if any, beyond improper payments prevention, does your State take to specifically prevent fraud? Customer Educational Training regarding reporting requirements, etc.
Clients must read and sign the Rights and Responsibilities items each time a review is completed.
19. Is your agency required to report, or to have information available, on improper payments to the State legislature, the Governor, or any other higher-level agencies? (Please check one response.)
X Yes ® Please provide a copy of the report(s), and indicate who received them.
The reports are submitted to ACF.
q No
|
Other |
20. Describe any other information that may be relevant to improper payments in the program that you wish to share with us.
21. Please submit copies of pertinent sections of manuals and other State-issued guidance that you would like to make available, or provide the web site address where they can be found.
Chapter 20.3 of the West Virginia Income Maintenance Manual is available on-line at
http://www.wvdhhr.org/bcf/policy/imm/new_manual/default.asp
|
Thank you very much for your time and assistance! |
Improper Payments Information Survey for the West Virginia TANF Program form in (PDF) file format
WV WORKS Quality Assurance Hand Book Revised 2005 in (PDF) file format
WV WORKS Quality Assurance Report FFY 2003 in (PDF) file format
WV WORKS Quality Assurance Report FFY 2004 in (PDF) file format
This document was last modified on
Sep-26-2006
.