Skip Navigation
acfbanner  
ACF
Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families
          
ACF Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News   |   HHS Home

  Questions?  |  Privacy  |  Site Index  |  Contact Us  |  Download Reader™Download Reader  |  Print Print      


  TANF Financial Data > FY 2005 TANF Financial Data


TANF FINANCIAL DATA


Table A2 - FY 2004 FEDERAL FUNDS SPENT IN FY 2005
EXPENDITURES ON NON-ASSISTANCE IN FY 2005 THROUGH THE FOURTH QUARTER

Data reported by States in Column A on Form ACF-196 Line Items

STATE LINE 6
TOTAL EXPENDITURES ON NON-ASSISTANCE		 Line 6a
WORK RELATED ACTIVITIES		 Line 6b
CHILD CARE		 Line 6c
TRANSPORTATION		 Line 6d
IDA		 Line 6e
REFUNDABLE EITC		 Line 6f
OTHER REFUNDABLE TAX CREDIT		 Line 6g
NON-RECUR
SHORT-TERM
BENEFITS		 Line 6i
NON-ASSIST SOLELY UNDER PRIOR LAW		 Total of Other Categories of Non-Assistance Lines 6h - 6m % OF TOTAL EXPENDITURES SPENT ON NON ASSISTANCE 2/
ALABAMA 8,292,855 457,404 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,835,449 22%
ALASKA 1,279,620 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,279,620 12%
ARIZONA 13,890,957 909,784 <868,260> 97,197 0 0 0 0 4,822,146 8,930,090 60%
ARKANSAS <18,480> 0 0 0 <18,480> 0 0 0 0 0 100%
CALIFORNIA 19,452,030 <1,486,429> 310,519 4,617 0 0 0 0 0 20,623,323 8%
COLORADO <197,809> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <197,809> -1%
CONNECTICUT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
DELAWARE 232,342 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 232,342 6%
DIST.OF COLUMBIA 13,137,516 10,894,545 3,751,545 0 0 0 0 0 0 <1,508,574> 76%
FLORIDA 102,884,084 43,943,502 47,349,941 3,909,034 0 0 0 8,599 0 7,673,008 108%
GEORGIA 22,004,191 5,032,103 0 0 0 0 0 0 8,688,770 8,283,318 83%
HAWAII 5,689,531 4,305,147 0 8,376 0 0 0 0 0 1,376,008 55%
IDAHO 4,456,477 859,550 0 0 0 0 0 373,239 0 3,223,688 45%
ILLINOIS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
INDIANA 3,305,201 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,305,201 8%
IOWA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
KANSAS 1,748,600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,748,600 34%
KENTUCKY 3,470,798 376,834 1,475,000 350,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,268,964 7%
LOUISIANA 17,305,283 3,705,485 0 1,237,329 0 0 0 0 0 12,362,469 103%
MAINE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
MARYLAND 3,330,868 2,548,955 86,585 118,625 0 0 0 0 0 576,703 5%
MASSACHUSETTS 1,885,069 0 425,217 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,459,852 29%
MICHIGAN <498,569> <91,205> 14,495 <45,925> 417,518 0 0 0 <3,000> <790,452> 0%
MINNESOTA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
MISSISSIPPI 2,623,028 461,509 <28,429> 1,577,970 0 0 0 0 0 611,978 107%
MISSOURI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
MONTANA 726,261 893,757 0 0 0 0 0 21,050 <53,442> <135,104> 4%
NEBRASKA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
NEVADA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
NEW HAMPSHIRE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
NEW JERSEY <20,599,284> <43,707,082> 0 614,796 8,728 18,393,000 0 1,443,405 <10,728,909> 13,376,778 -52%
NEW MEXICO 4,188,455 1,768,444 0 156,894 0 0 0 0 0 2,263,117 13%
NEW YORK 134,964,488 37,229,520 0 8,543,130 0 0 0 3,899,997 <31,954> 85,323,795 57%
NORTH CAROLINA 61,194,176 7,432,735 342,314 412,742 0 0 0 1,228,276 38,585,748 13,192,361 98%
NORTH DAKOTA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
OHIO 195,480,551 34,551,677 26,060,899 6,009,669 0 0 0 25,230,869 0 103,627,437 96%
OKLAHOMA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
OREGON <3,198,830> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <3,198,830> -7%
PENNSYLVANIA 159,192,647 113,282,201 2,599,505 10,415,216 0 0 0 1,997,330 2,075,977 28,822,418 245%
RHODE ISLAND 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
SOUTH CAROLINA 63,296 63,297 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <1> 4%
SOUTH DAKOTA 597,296 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 597,296 100%
TENNESSEE <17,550> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <17,550> 0%
TEXAS 6,241,761 10,429,843 0 231,680 350,310 0 0 240,195 0 <5,010,267> 7%
UTAH 2,044,921 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,044,921 12%
VERMONT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
VIRGINIA 214,044 214,044 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2%
WASHINGTON <239,525> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <239,525> -7%
WEST VIRGINIA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
WISCONSIN <8,198,730> <6,901> <8,751,893> 65,434 0 0 0 0 0 494,630 -6710%
WYOMING 11,379,572 <23,626> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11,403,198 106%
Total 768,307,141 234,045,093 72,767,440 33,706,784 758,076 18,393,000 0 34,442,960 43,355,336 330,838,452 -
Percentages 1/ 100% 30% 9% 4% 0% 2% 0% 4% 6% 43% -
Percentages 2/ 40% 12% 4% 2% 0% 1% 0% 2% 2% 17% -
1/ The percentages shown are calculated as a proportion of total expenditures on non-assistance (Line 6).
2/ The percentages shown are calculated as a proportion of total TANF expenditures (Line 7).An abnormal negative percentage is the result of the total expenditures on non-assistance being a negative value. An abnormal positive percentage is the result of total expenditures being less than that of expenditures on non-assistance.


Department of Health and Human Services Logo Department of Health and Human Services
Administration for Children and Families